Theorem bdsepnf 16534

Description: Version of ax-bdsep 16530 with one disjoint variable condition removed, the other disjoint variable condition replaced by a nonfreeness hypothesis, and without initial universal quantifier. See also bdsepnfALT 16535. Use bdsep1 16531 when sufficient. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bdsepnf.nf	⊢ Ⅎ𝑏𝜑
bdsepnf.1	⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bdsepnf	⊢ ∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑))

Distinct variable group:   𝑎,𝑏,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑎,𝑏)

Proof of Theorem bdsepnf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdsepnf.1	. . 3 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
2	1	bdsepnft 16533	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑏𝜑 → ∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑)))
3		bdsepnf.nf	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑏𝜑
4	2, 3	mpg 1499	1 ⊢ ∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105  ∀wal 1395  Ⅎwnf 1508  ∃wex 1540  BOUNDED wbd 16458

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-bdsep 16530

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1509  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227

This theorem is referenced by: (None)