Theorem 19.33bdc 1641

Description: Converse of 19.33 1495 given ¬ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥𝜓) and a decidability condition. Compare Theorem 19.33 of [Margaris] p. 90. For a version which does not require a decidability condition, see 19.33b2 1640 (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Apr-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
19.33bdc	⊢ (DECID ∃𝑥𝜑 → (¬ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥𝜓))))

Proof of Theorem 19.33bdc

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ianordc 900	. 2 ⊢ (DECID ∃𝑥𝜑 → (¬ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥𝜓) ↔ (¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ ¬ ∃𝑥𝜓)))
2		19.33b2 1640	. 2 ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ ¬ ∃𝑥𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥𝜓)))
3	1, 2	biimtrdi 163	1 ⊢ (DECID ∃𝑥𝜑 → (¬ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥𝜓))))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   ∨ wo 709  DECID wdc 835  ∀wal 1362  ∃wex 1503

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie2 1505

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 836  df-tru 1367  df-fal 1370

This theorem is referenced by: (None)