Theorem 19.33bdc 1610

Description: Converse of 19.33 1464 given ¬ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥𝜓) and a decidability condition. Compare Theorem 19.33 of [Margaris] p. 90. For a version which does not require a decidability condition, see 19.33b2 1609 (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Apr-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
19.33bdc	⊢ (DECID ∃𝑥𝜑 → (¬ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥𝜓))))

Proof of Theorem 19.33bdc

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ianordc 885	. 2 ⊢ (DECID ∃𝑥𝜑 → (¬ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥𝜓) ↔ (¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ ¬ ∃𝑥𝜓)))
2		19.33b2 1609	. 2 ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ ¬ ∃𝑥𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥𝜓)))
3	1, 2	syl6bi 162	1 ⊢ (DECID ∃𝑥𝜑 → (¬ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥𝜓))))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104   ∨ wo 698  DECID wdc 820  ∀wal 1333  ∃wex 1472

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 604  ax-in2 605  ax-io 699  ax-5 1427  ax-gen 1429  ax-ie2 1474

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-dc 821  df-tru 1338  df-fal 1341

This theorem is referenced by: (None)