MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  3jao Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem 3jao 1452
Description: Disjunction of three antecedents. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
3jao (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜓)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃) → 𝜓))

Proof of Theorem 3jao
StepHypRef Expression
1 jao 975 . . 3 ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) → 𝜓)))
2 df-3or 1104 . . . 4 ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∨ 𝜃))
3 jao 975 . . . 4 (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) → 𝜓) → ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∨ 𝜃) → 𝜓)))
42, 3syl7bi 258 . . 3 (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) → 𝜓) → ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃) → 𝜓)))
51, 4syl6 36 . 2 ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → 𝜓) → ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃) → 𝜓))))
653imp 1128 1 (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜓)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃) → 𝜓))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∨ wo 861   ∨ w3o 1102   ∧ w3a 1103
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105
This theorem is used by:  3jaoiOLD  1455  3jaod  1456  3jaao  1460
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator