Theorem bj-axnul 37709

Description: Over the base theory ax-1 6-- ax-5 1940, the axiom of separation implies the weak emptyset axiom.

By "weak emptyset axiom", we mean the axiom asserting existence of an empty set (which can be called "the" empty set when the axiom of extensionality ax-ext 2735 is posited) provided existence of a set (the True truth constant existentially quantified over a fresh variable, extru 2005). This is the conclusion of bj-axnul 37709.

Note that the weak emptyset axiom implies ⊢ (∃𝑥⊤ → ∃𝑦⊤) without DV conditions hence also the same statement as the weak emptyset axiom without DV conditions on 𝑥, but only on 𝑦, 𝑧.

By "axiom of separation", we mean the universal closure of ax-sep 5257, simulated here by its instance with ⊥ substituted for 𝜑 (and with the variable used to assert existence in the weak emptyset axiom substituted for the containing set) as the hypothesis of bj-axnul 37709.

In particular, the axiom of existence extru 2005 and the axiom of separation together imply the emptyset axiom (and conversely, the emptyset axiom implies the axiom of existence).

Note: this theorem does not require a disjointness condition on 𝑦, 𝑧, although both axioms should be stated with all variables disjoint.

This proof only uses an instance of the axiom of separation with a bounded formula, so is valid in a constructive setting (see the CZF section in the "Intuitionistic Logic Explorer" iset.mm). (Contributed by BJ, 8-Mar-2026.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bj-axnul.axsep	⊢ ∀𝑥∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ⊥))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-axnul	⊢ (∃𝑥⊤ → ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ⊥)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝑧

Proof of Theorem bj-axnul

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-bisimpr 37146	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ⊥)) → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ⊥))
2	1	alimi 1841	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ⊥)) → ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ⊥))
3	2	ralrid 3087	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ⊥)) → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ⊥)
4	3	eximi 1865	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ⊥)) → ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ⊥)
5		bj-axnul.axsep	. . 3 ⊢ ∀𝑥∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ⊥))
6	4, 5	bj-alimii 37210	. 2 ⊢ ∀𝑥∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ⊥
7		bj-spvw 37257	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥⊤ → (∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ⊥ ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ⊥))
8	6, 7	mpbiri 261	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥⊤ → ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ⊥)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400  ∀wal 1568  ⊤wtru 1571  ⊥wfal 1582  ∃wex 1809  ∀wral 3079

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-ex 1810  df-ral 3080

This theorem is referenced by: (None)