Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 375 of 465) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-29277) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(29278-30800) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30801-46488) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | hl0lt1N 37401 | Lattice 0 is less than lattice 1 in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 0 < 1 ) | ||
Theorem | hlexch3 37402 | A Hilbert lattice has the exchange property. (atexch 30740 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 ) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | hlexch4N 37403 | A Hilbert lattice has the exchange property. Part of Definition 7.8 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 32. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 ) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄))) | ||
Theorem | hlatexchb1 37404 | A version of hlexchb1 37395 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄))) | ||
Theorem | hlatexchb2 37405 | A version of hlexchb2 37396 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ↔ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | hlatexch1 37406 | Atom exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | hlatexch2 37407 | Atom exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | hlatmstcOLDN 37408* | An atomic, complete, orthomodular lattice is atomistic i.e. every element is the join of the atoms under it. See remark before Proposition 1 in [Kalmbach] p. 140; also remark in [BeltramettiCassinelli] p. 98. (hatomistici 30721 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑈‘{𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑋}) = 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | hlatle 37409* | The ordering of two Hilbert lattice elements is determined by the atoms under them. (chrelat3 30730 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 → 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | hlateq 37410* | The equality of two Hilbert lattice elements is determined by the atoms under them. (chrelat4i 30732 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | hlrelat1 37411* | An atomistic lattice with 0 is relatively atomic. Part of Lemma 7.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 30. (chpssati 30722, with ∧ swapped, analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | hlrelat5N 37412* | An atomistic lattice with 0 is relatively atomic, using the definition in Remark 2 of [Kalmbach] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋 < (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | hlrelat 37413* | A Hilbert lattice is relatively atomic. Remark 2 of [Kalmbach] p. 149. (chrelati 30723 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋 < (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ≤ 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | hlrelat2 37414* | A consequence of relative atomicity. (chrelat2i 30724 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Feb-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | exatleN 37415 | A condition for an atom to be less than or equal to a lattice element. Part of proof of Lemma A in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑅 = 𝑃)) | ||
Theorem | hl2at 37416* | A Hilbert lattice has at least 2 atoms. (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) | ||
Theorem | atex 37417 | At least one atom exists. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) | ||
Theorem | intnatN 37418 | If the intersection with a non-majorizing element is an atom, the intersecting element is not an atom. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | 2llnne2N 37419 | Condition implying that two intersecting lines are different. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ≠ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | 2llnneN 37420 | Condition implying that two intersecting lines are different. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ≠ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | cvr1 37421 | A Hilbert lattice has the covering property. Proposition 1(ii) in [Kalmbach] p. 140 (and its converse). (chcv1 30714 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | cvr2N 37422 | Less-than and covers equivalence in a Hilbert lattice. (chcv2 30715 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋 < (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | hlrelat3 37423* | The Hilbert lattice is relatively atomic. Stronger version of hlrelat 37413. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ≤ 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | cvrval3 37424* | Binary relation expressing 𝑌 covers 𝑋. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) = 𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | cvrval4N 37425* | Binary relation expressing 𝑌 covers 𝑋. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) = 𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | cvrval5 37426* | Binary relation expressing 𝑋 covers 𝑋 ∧ 𝑌. (Contributed by NM, 7-Dec-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)𝐶𝑋 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ (𝑝 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)) = 𝑋))) | ||
Theorem | cvrp 37427 | A Hilbert lattice satisfies the covering property of Definition 7.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31 and its converse. (cvp 30734 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) = 0 ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | atcvr1 37428 | An atom is covered by its join with a different atom. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) | ||
Theorem | atcvr2 37429 | An atom is covered by its join with a different atom. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | cvrexchlem 37430 | Lemma for cvrexch 37431. (cvexchlem 30727 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)𝐶𝑌 → 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | cvrexch 37431 | A Hilbert lattice satisfies the exchange axiom. Proposition 1(iii) of [Kalmbach] p. 140 and its converse. Originally proved by Garrett Birkhoff in 1933. (cvexchi 30728 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)𝐶𝑌 ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | cvratlem 37432 | Lemma for cvrat 37433. (atcvatlem 30744 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑋 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (¬ 𝑃(le‘𝐾)𝑋 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | cvrat 37433 | A nonzero Hilbert lattice element less than the join of two atoms is an atom. (atcvati 30745 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑋 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | ltltncvr 37434 | A chained strong ordering is not a covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 < 𝑍) → ¬ 𝑋𝐶𝑍)) | ||
Theorem | ltcvrntr 37435 | Non-transitive condition for the covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌𝐶𝑍) → ¬ 𝑋𝐶𝑍)) | ||
Theorem | cvrntr 37436 | The covers relation is not transitive. (cvntr 30651 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋𝐶𝑌 ∧ 𝑌𝐶𝑍) → ¬ 𝑋𝐶𝑍)) | ||
Theorem | atcvr0eq 37437 | The covers relation is not transitive. (atcv0eq 30738 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → ( 0 𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ 𝑃 = 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | lnnat 37438 | A line (the join of two distinct atoms) is not an atom. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ ¬ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | atcvrj0 37439 | Two atoms covering the zero subspace are equal. (atcv1 30739 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑋 = 0 ↔ 𝑃 = 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | cvrat2 37440 | A Hilbert lattice element covered by the join of two distinct atoms is an atom. (atcvat2i 30746 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑋𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | atcvrneN 37441 | Inequality derived from atom condition. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | atcvrj1 37442 | Condition for an atom to be covered by the join of two others. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | atcvrj2b 37443 | Condition for an atom to be covered by the join of two others. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | atcvrj2 37444 | Condition for an atom to be covered by the join of two others. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | atleneN 37445 | Inequality derived from atom condition. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | atltcvr 37446 | An equivalence of less-than ordering and covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) |
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑃 < (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | atle 37447* | Any nonzero element has an atom under it. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | atlt 37448 | Two atoms are unequal iff their join is greater than one of them. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2012.) |
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | atlelt 37449 | Transfer less-than relation from one atom to another. (Contributed by NM, 7-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑄 < 𝑋)) → 𝑃 < 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | 2atlt 37450* | Given an atom less than an element, there is another atom less than the element. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 < 𝑋) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑞 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑞 < 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | atexchcvrN 37451 | Atom exchange property. Version of hlatexch2 37407 with covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) → 𝑄𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | atexchltN 37452 | Atom exchange property. Version of hlatexch2 37407 with less-than ordering. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 < (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) → 𝑄 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | cvrat3 37453 | A condition implying that a certain lattice element is an atom. Part of Lemma 3.2.20 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (atcvat3i 30755 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑋 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | cvrat4 37454* | A condition implying existence of an atom with the properties shown. Lemma 3.2.20 in [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. Also Lemma 9.2(delta) in [MaedaMaeda] p. 41. (atcvat4i 30756 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))) | ||
Theorem | cvrat42 37455* | Commuted version of cvrat4 37454. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑄)))) | ||
Theorem | 2atjm 37456 | The meet of a line (expressed with 2 atoms) and a lattice element. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑋) = 𝑃) | ||
Theorem | atbtwn 37457 | Property of a 3rd atom 𝑅 on a line 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 intersecting element 𝑋 at 𝑃. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ↔ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | atbtwnexOLDN 37458* | There exists a 3rd atom 𝑟 on a line 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 intersecting element 𝑋 at 𝑃, such that 𝑟 is different from 𝑄 and not in 𝑋. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) | ||
Theorem | atbtwnex 37459* | Given atoms 𝑃 in 𝑋 and 𝑄 not in 𝑋, there exists an atom 𝑟 not in 𝑋 such that the line 𝑄 ∨ 𝑟 intersects 𝑋 at 𝑃. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟))) | ||
Theorem | 3noncolr2 37460 | Two ways to express 3 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 2 places). (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | 3noncolr1N 37461 | Two ways to express 3 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 1 place). (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | hlatcon3 37462 | Atom exchange combined with contraposition. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | hlatcon2 37463 | Atom exchange combined with contraposition. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | 4noncolr3 37464 | A way to express 4 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 3 places). (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) | ||
Theorem | 4noncolr2 37465 | A way to express 4 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 2 places). (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑅 ≠ 𝑆 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∨ 𝑃))) | ||
Theorem | 4noncolr1 37466 | A way to express 4 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 1 places). (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑆 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) ∨ 𝑄))) | ||
Theorem | athgt 37467* | A Hilbert lattice, whose height is at least 4, has a chain of 4 successively covering atom joins. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝𝐶(𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞)𝐶((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟) ∧ ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟)𝐶(((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟) ∨ 𝑠)))) | ||
Theorem | 3dim0 37468* | There exists a 3-dimensional (height-4) element i.e. a volume. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟))) | ||
Theorem | 3dimlem1 37469 | Lemma for 3dim1 37478. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)) ∧ 𝑃 = 𝑄) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) | ||
Theorem | 3dimlem2 37470 | Lemma for 3dim1 37478. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑆))) | ||
Theorem | 3dimlem3a 37471 | Lemma for 3dim3 37480. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) → ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | 3dimlem3 37472 | Lemma for 3dim1 37478. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | 3dimlem3OLDN 37473 | Lemma for 3dim1 37478. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | 3dimlem4a 37474 | Lemma for 3dim3 37480. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) → ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | 3dimlem4 37475 | Lemma for 3dim1 37478. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | 3dimlem4OLDN 37476 | Lemma for 3dim1 37478. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) | ||
Theorem | 3dim1lem5 37477* | Lemma for 3dim1 37478. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑢 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ ¬ 𝑤 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∨ 𝑣))) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑃 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟))) | ||
Theorem | 3dim1 37478* | Construct a 3-dimensional volume (height-4 element) on top of a given atom 𝑃. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑃 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟))) | ||
Theorem | 3dim2 37479* | Construct 2 new layers on top of 2 given atoms. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑟))) | ||
Theorem | 3dim3 37480* | Construct a new layer on top of 3 given atoms. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | 2dim 37481* | Generate a height-3 element (2-dimensional plane) from an atom. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-2012.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑃𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑞)𝐶((𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟))) | ||
Theorem | 1dimN 37482* | An atom is covered by a height-2 element (1-dimensional line). (Contributed by NM, 3-May-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 𝑃𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑞)) | ||
Theorem | 1cvrco 37483 | The orthocomplement of an element covered by 1 is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 7-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾) & ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶 1 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | 1cvratex 37484* | There exists an atom less than an element covered by 1. (Contributed by NM, 7-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋𝐶 1 ) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 𝑝 < 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | 1cvratlt 37485 | An atom less than or equal to an element covered by 1 is less than the element. (Contributed by NM, 7-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾) & ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋)) → 𝑃 < 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | 1cvrjat 37486 | An element covered by the lattice unit, when joined with an atom not under it, equals the lattice unit. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋)) → (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) = 1 ) | ||
Theorem | 1cvrat 37487 | Create an atom under an element covered by the lattice unit. Part of proof of Lemma B in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑋) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | ps-1 37488 | The join of two atoms 𝑅 ∨ 𝑆 (specifying a projective geometry line) is determined uniquely by any two atoms (specifying two points) less than or equal to that join. Part of Lemma 16.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 69, showing projective space postulate PS1 in [MaedaMaeda] p. 67. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ↔ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆))) | ||
Theorem | ps-2 37489* | Lattice analogue for the projective geometry axiom, "if a line intersects two sides of a triangle at different points then it also intersects the third side." Projective space condition PS2 in [MaedaMaeda] p. 68 and part of Theorem 16.4 in [MaedaMaeda] p. 69. (Contributed by NM, 1-Dec-2011.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑆 ≠ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑇 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑢 ≤ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇))) | ||
Theorem | 2atjlej 37490 | Two atoms are different if their join majorizes the join of two different atoms. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆))) → 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | hlatexch3N 37491 | Rearrange join of atoms in an equality. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | hlatexch4 37492 | Exchange 2 atoms. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2013.) |
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑄 ≠ 𝑆 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆))) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | ps-2b 37493 | Variation of projective geometry axiom ps-2 37489. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) & ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑆 ≠ 𝑇 ∧ (𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑇 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≠ 0 ) | ||
Theorem | 3atlem1 37494 | Lemma for 3at 37501. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | 3atlem2 37495 | Lemma for 3at 37501. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | 3atlem3 37496 | Lemma for 3at 37501. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑈 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | 3atlem4 37497 | Lemma for 3at 37501. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑅)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | 3atlem5 37498 | Lemma for 3at 37501. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | 3atlem6 37499 | Lemma for 3at 37501. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | 3atlem7 37500 | Lemma for 3at 37501. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) = ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈)) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |