P. 375 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 37401-37500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	bj-opelidb 37401	Characterization of the ordered pair elements of the identity relation. Remark: in deduction-style proofs, one could save a few syntactic steps by using another antecedent than ⊤ which already appears in the proof. Here for instance this could be the definition I = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑦} but this would make the proof less easy to read. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ I ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-opelidb1 37402	Characterization of the ordered pair elements of the identity relation. Variant of bj-opelidb 37401 where only the sethood of the first component is expressed. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ I ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-inexeqex 37403	Lemma for bj-opelid 37405 (but not specific to the identity relation): if the intersection of two classes is a set and the two classes are equal, then both are sets (all three classes are equal, so they all belong to 𝑉, but it is more convenient to have V in the consequent for theorems using it). (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	bj-elsn0 37404	If the intersection of two classes is a set, then these classes are equal if and only if one is an element of the singleton formed on the other. Stronger form of elsng 4596 and elsn2g 4623 (which could be proved from it). (Contributed by BJ, 20-Jan-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-opelid 37405	Characterization of the ordered pair elements of the identity relation when the intersection of their components are sets. Note that the antecedent is more general than either component being a set. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ I ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-ideqg 37406	Characterization of the classes related by the identity relation when their intersection is a set. Note that the antecedent is more general than either class being a set. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.) Weaken the antecedent to sethood of the intersection. (Revised by BJ, 24-Dec-2023.) TODO: replace ideqg 5808, or at least prove ideqg 5808 from it.
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-ideqgALT 37407	Alternate proof of bj-ideqg 37406 from brabga 5490 instead of bj-opelid 37405 itself proved from bj-opelidb 37401. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-ideqb 37408	Characterization of classes related by the identity relation. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-idres 37409	Alternate expression for the restricted identity relation. The advantage of that expression is to expose it as a "bounded" class, being included in the Cartesian square of the restricting class. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.) This is an alternate of idinxpresid 6015 (see idinxpres 6014). See also elrid 6013 and elidinxp 6011. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐴) = ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))
Theorem	bj-opelidres 37410	Characterization of the ordered pairs in the restricted identity relation when the intersection of their component belongs to the restricting class. TODO: prove bj-idreseq 37411 from it. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ ( I ↾ 𝑉) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-idreseq 37411	Sufficient condition for the restricted identity relation to agree with equality. Note that the instance of bj-ideqg 37406 with V substituted for 𝑉 is a direct consequence of bj-idreseq 37411. This is a strengthening of resieq 5957 which should be proved from it (note that currently, resieq 5957 relies on ideq 5809). Note that the intersection in the antecedent is not very meaningful, but is a device to prove versions with either class assumed to be a set. It could be enough to prove the version with a disjunctive antecedent: ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → ...). (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-idreseqb 37412	Characterization for two classes to be related under the restricted identity relation. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-ideqg1 37413	For sets, the identity relation is the same thing as equality. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Generalize to a disjunctive antecedent. (Revised by BJ, 24-Dec-2023.) TODO: delete once bj-ideqg 37406 is in the main section.
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-ideqg1ALT 37414	Alternate proof of bj-ideqg1 using brabga 5490 instead of the "unbounded" version bj-brab2a1 37398 or brab2a 5725. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) TODO: delete once bj-ideqg 37406 is in the main section.
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-opelidb1ALT 37415	Characterization of the couples in I. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Mar-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ I ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-elid3 37416	Characterization of the couples in I whose first component is a setvar. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝐴⟩ ∈ I ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-elid4 37417	Characterization of the elements of I. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∈ I ↔ (1st ‘𝐴) = (2nd ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	bj-elid5 37418	Characterization of the elements of I. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ I ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ (1st ‘𝐴) = (2nd ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	bj-elid6 37419	Characterization of the elements of the diagonal of a Cartesian square. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ (1st ‘𝐵) = (2nd ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	bj-elid7 37420	Characterization of the elements of the diagonal of a Cartesian square. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ ( I ↾ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
21.19.6.3  Functionalized identity (diagonal in a Cartesian square) This subsection defines a functionalized version of the identity relation, that can also be seen as the diagonal in a Cartesian square. As explained in df-bj-diag 37422, it will probably be deleted.
Syntax	cdiag2 37421	Syntax for the diagonal of the Cartesian square of a set.
class Id
Definition	df-bj-diag 37422	Define the functionalized identity, which can also be seen as the diagonal function. Its value is given in bj-diagval 37423 when it is viewed as the functionalized identity, and in bj-diagval2 37424 when it is viewed as the diagonal function. Indeed, Definition df-br 5101 identifies a binary relation with the class of couples that are related by that binary relation (see eqrel2 38550 for the extensionality property of binary relations). As a consequence, the identity relation, or identity function (see funi 6532), on any class, can alternatively be seen as the diagonal of the cartesian square of that class. The identity relation on the universal class, I, is an "identity relation generator", since its restriction to any class is the identity relation on that class. It may be useful to consider a functionalized version of that fact, and that is the purpose of df-bj-diag 37422. Note: most proofs will only use its values (Id‘𝐴), in which case it may be enough to use ( I ↾ 𝐴) everywhere and dispense with this definition. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ Id = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ( I ↾ 𝑥))
Theorem	bj-diagval 37423	Value of the functionalized identity, or equivalently of the diagonal function. This expression views it as the functionalized identity, whereas bj-diagval2 37424 views it as the diagonal function. See df-bj-diag 37422 for the terminology. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (Id‘𝐴) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	bj-diagval2 37424	Value of the functionalized identity, or equivalently of the diagonal function. This expression views it as the diagonal function, whereas bj-diagval 37423 views it as the functionalized identity. See df-bj-diag 37422 for the terminology. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (Id‘𝐴) = ( I ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
Theorem	bj-eldiag 37425	Characterization of the elements of the diagonal of a Cartesian square. Subsumed by bj-elid6 37419. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ (Id‘𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ (1st ‘𝐵) = (2nd ‘𝐵))))
Theorem	bj-eldiag2 37426	Characterization of the elements of the diagonal of a Cartesian square. Subsumed by bj-elid7 37420. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ (Id‘𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
21.19.6.4  Direct image and inverse image Definitions of the functionalized direct image and inverse image. The functionalized direct (resp. inverse) image is the morphism component of the covariant (resp. contravariant) powerset endofunctor of the category of sets and relations (and, up to restriction, of its subcategory of sets and functions). Its object component is the powerset operation 𝒫 defined in df-pw 4558.
Syntax	cimdir 37427	Syntax for the functionalized direct image.
class 𝒫*
Definition	df-imdir 37428*	Definition of the functionalized direct image, which maps a binary relation between two given sets to its associated direct image relation. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Dec-2023.)
⊢ 𝒫* = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑎 × 𝑏) ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑏) ∧ (𝑟 “ 𝑥) = 𝑦)}))
Theorem	bj-imdirvallem 37429*	Lemma for bj-imdirval 37430 and bj-iminvval 37442. (Contributed by BJ, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑎 × 𝑏) ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑏) ∧ 𝜓)}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐶𝐵) = (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)}))
Theorem	bj-imdirval 37430*	Value of the functionalized direct image. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝒫*𝐵) = (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑟 “ 𝑥) = 𝑦)}))
Theorem	bj-imdirval2lem 37431*	Lemma for bj-imdirval2 37432 and bj-iminvval2 37443. (Contributed by BJ, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)} ∈ V)
Theorem	bj-imdirval2 37432*	Value of the functionalized direct image. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝒫*𝐵)‘𝑅) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑅 “ 𝑥) = 𝑦)})
Theorem	bj-imdirval3 37433	Value of the functionalized direct image. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋((𝐴𝒫*𝐵)‘𝑅)𝑌 ↔ ((𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑅 “ 𝑋) = 𝑌)))
Theorem	bj-imdiridlem 37434*	Lemma for bj-imdirid 37435 and bj-iminvid 37444. (Contributed by BJ, 26-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜑)} = ( I ↾ 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-imdirid 37435	Functorial property of the direct image: the direct image by the identity on a set is the identity on the powerset. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝒫*𝐴)‘( I ↾ 𝐴)) = ( I ↾ 𝒫 𝐴))
Theorem	bj-opelopabid 37436*	Membership in an ordered-pair class abstraction. One can remove the DV condition on 𝑥, 𝑦 by using opabid 5481 in place of opabidw 5480. (Contributed by BJ, 22-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	bj-opabco 37437*	Composition of ordered-pair class abstractions. (Contributed by BJ, 22-May-2024.)
⊢ ({⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ∘ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	bj-xpcossxp 37438	The composition of two Cartesian products is included in the expected Cartesian product. There is equality if (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ≠ ∅, see xpcogend 14909. (Contributed by BJ, 22-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐶 × 𝐷) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐷)
Theorem	bj-imdirco 37439	Functorial property of the direct image: the direct image by a composition is the composition of the direct images. (Contributed by BJ, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝐵 × 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝒫*𝐶)‘(𝑆 ∘ 𝑅)) = (((𝐵𝒫*𝐶)‘𝑆) ∘ ((𝐴𝒫*𝐵)‘𝑅)))
Syntax	ciminv 37440	Syntax for the functionalized inverse image.
class 𝒫*
Definition	df-iminv 37441*	Definition of the functionalized inverse image, which maps a binary relation between two given sets to its associated inverse image relation. (Contributed by BJ, 23-Dec-2023.)
⊢ 𝒫* = (𝑎 ∈ V, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑎 × 𝑏) ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑏) ∧ 𝑥 = (◡𝑟 “ 𝑦))}))
Theorem	bj-iminvval 37442*	Value of the functionalized inverse image. (Contributed by BJ, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝒫*𝐵) = (𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 = (◡𝑟 “ 𝑦))}))
Theorem	bj-iminvval2 37443*	Value of the functionalized inverse image. (Contributed by BJ, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝒫*𝐵)‘𝑅) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 = (◡𝑅 “ 𝑦))})
Theorem	bj-iminvid 37444	Functorial property of the inverse image: the inverse image by the identity on a set is the identity on the powerset. (Contributed by BJ, 26-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝒫*𝐴)‘( I ↾ 𝐴)) = ( I ↾ 𝒫 𝐴))
21.19.6.5  Extended numbers and projective lines as sets We parameterize the set of infinite extended complex numbers ℂ∞ (df-bj-ccinfty 37461) using the real numbers ℝ (df-r 11048) via the function +∞eiτ. Since at that point, we have only defined the set of real numbers but no operations on it, we define a temporary "fractional part" function, which is more convenient to define on the temporary reals R (df-nr 10979) since we can use operations on the latter. We also define the temporary real "one-half" in order to define minus infinity (df-bj-minfty 37473) and then we can define the sets of extended real numbers and of extended complex numbers, and the projective real and complex lines, as well as addition and negation on these, and also the order relation on the extended reals (which bypasses the intermediate definition of a temporary order on the real numbers and then a superseding one on the extended real numbers).
Syntax	cfractemp 37445	Syntax for the fractional part of a temporary real.
class {R
Definition	df-bj-fractemp 37446*	Temporary definition: fractional part of a temporary real. To understand this definition, recall the canonical injection ω⟶R, 𝑛 ↦ [{𝑥 ∈ Q ∣ 𝑥 <Q ⟨suc 𝑛, 1o⟩}, 1P] ~R where we successively take the successor of 𝑛 to land in positive integers, then take the couple with 1o as second component to land in positive rationals, then take the Dedekind cut that positive rational forms, and finally take the equivalence class of the couple with 1P as second component. Adding one at the beginning and subtracting it at the end is necessary since the constructions used in set.mm use the positive integers, positive rationals, and positive reals as intermediate number systems. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jan-2023.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. One could even inline it. The definitive fractional part of an extended or projective complex number will be defined later. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ {R = (𝑥 ∈ R ↦ (℩𝑦 ∈ R ((𝑦 = 0R ∨ (0R <R 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 <R 1R)) ∧ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω ([⟨{𝑧 ∈ Q ∣ 𝑧 <Q ⟨suc 𝑛, 1o⟩}, 1P⟩] ~R +R 𝑦) = 𝑥)))
Syntax	cinftyexpitau 37447	Syntax for the function +∞eiτ parameterizing ℂ∞.
class +∞eiτ
Definition	df-bj-inftyexpitau 37448	Definition of the auxiliary function +∞eiτ parameterizing the circle at infinity ℂ∞ in ℂ̅. We use coupling with {R} to simplify the proof of bj-inftyexpitaudisj 37454. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jan-2023.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. TODO: prove only the necessary lemmas to prove ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((+∞eiτ‘𝐴) = (+∞eiτ‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ ℤ)). (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ +∞eiτ = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⟨({R‘(1st ‘𝑥)), {R}⟩)
Syntax	cccinftyN 37449	Syntax for the circle at infinity ℂ∞N.
class ℂ∞N
Definition	df-bj-ccinftyN 37450	Definition of the circle at infinity ℂ∞N. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℂ∞N = ran +∞eiτ
Theorem	bj-inftyexpitaufo 37451	The function +∞eiτ written as a surjection with domain and range. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.)
⊢ +∞eiτ:ℝ–onto→ℂ∞N
Syntax	chalf 37452	Syntax for the temporary one-half.
class 1/2
Definition	df-bj-onehalf 37453	Define the temporary real "one-half". Once the machinery is developed, the real number "one-half" is commonly denoted by (1 / 2). (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.) TODO: $p |- 1/2 e. R. $= ? $. (riotacl 7342) $p |- -. 0R = 1/2 $= ? $. (since -. ( 0R +R 0R ) = 1R ) $p |- 0R <R 1/2 $= ? $. $p |- 1/2 <R 1R $= ? $. $p |- ( {R ` 0R ) = 0R $= ? $. $p |- ( {R ` 1/2 ) = 1/2 $= ? $. df-minfty $a |- minfty = ( inftyexpitau ` <. 1/2 , 0R >. ) $.
⊢ 1/2 = (℩𝑥 ∈ R (𝑥 +R 𝑥) = 1R)
Theorem	bj-inftyexpitaudisj 37454	An element of the circle at infinity is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.)
⊢ ¬ (+∞eiτ‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ
Syntax	cinftyexpi 37455	Syntax for the function +∞ei parameterizing ℂ∞.
class +∞ei
Definition	df-bj-inftyexpi 37456	Definition of the auxiliary function +∞ei parameterizing the circle at infinity ℂ∞ in ℂ̅. We use coupling with ℂ to simplify the proof of bj-ccinftydisj 37462. It could seem more natural to define +∞ei on all of ℝ, but we want to use only basic functions in the definition of ℂ̅. TODO: transition to df-bj-inftyexpitau 37448 instead. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ +∞ei = (𝑥 ∈ (-π(,]π) ↦ ⟨𝑥, ℂ⟩)
Theorem	bj-inftyexpiinv 37457	Utility theorem for the inverse of +∞ei. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) This utility theorem is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (-π(,]π) → (1st ‘(+∞ei‘𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-inftyexpiinj 37458	Injectivity of the parameterization +∞ei. Remark: a more conceptual proof would use bj-inftyexpiinv 37457 and the fact that a function with a retraction is injective. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (-π(,]π) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (-π(,]π)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (+∞ei‘𝐴) = (+∞ei‘𝐵)))
Theorem	bj-inftyexpidisj 37459	An element of the circle at infinity is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) This utility theorem is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ (+∞ei‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ
Syntax	cccinfty 37460	Syntax for the circle at infinity ℂ∞.
class ℂ∞
Definition	df-bj-ccinfty 37461	Definition of the circle at infinity ℂ∞. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℂ∞ = ran +∞ei
Theorem	bj-ccinftydisj 37462	The circle at infinity is disjoint from the set of complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (ℂ ∩ ℂ∞) = ∅
Theorem	bj-elccinfty 37463	A lemma for infinite extended complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (-π(,]π) → (+∞ei‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ∞)
Syntax	cccbar 37464	Syntax for the set of extended complex numbers ℂ̅.
class ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-ccbar 37465	Definition of the set of extended complex numbers ℂ̅. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℂ̅ = (ℂ ∪ ℂ∞)
Theorem	bj-ccssccbar 37466	Complex numbers are extended complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℂ ⊆ ℂ̅
Theorem	bj-ccinftyssccbar 37467	Infinite extended complex numbers are extended complex numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℂ∞ ⊆ ℂ̅
Syntax	cpinfty 37468	Syntax for "plus infinity".
class +∞
Definition	df-bj-pinfty 37469	Definition of "plus infinity". (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ +∞ = (+∞ei‘0)
Theorem	bj-pinftyccb 37470	The class +∞ is an extended complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ +∞ ∈ ℂ̅
Theorem	bj-pinftynrr 37471	The extended complex number +∞ is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ¬ +∞ ∈ ℂ
Syntax	cminfty 37472	Syntax for "minus infinity".
class -∞
Definition	df-bj-minfty 37473	Definition of "minus infinity". (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ -∞ = (+∞ei‘π)
Theorem	bj-minftyccb 37474	The class -∞ is an extended complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ -∞ ∈ ℂ̅
Theorem	bj-minftynrr 37475	The extended complex number -∞ is not a complex number. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ¬ -∞ ∈ ℂ
Theorem	bj-pinftynminfty 37476	The extended complex numbers +∞ and -∞ are different. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ +∞ ≠ -∞
Syntax	crrbar 37477	Syntax for the set of extended real numbers.
class ℝ̅
Definition	df-bj-rrbar 37478	Definition of the set of extended real numbers. This aims to replace df-xr 11182. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℝ̅ = (ℝ ∪ {-∞, +∞})
Syntax	cinfty 37479	Syntax for ∞.
class ∞
Definition	df-bj-infty 37480	Definition of ∞, the point at infinity of the real or complex projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∞ = 𝒫 ∪ ℂ
Syntax	ccchat 37481	Syntax for ℂ̂.
class ℂ̂
Definition	df-bj-cchat 37482	Define the complex projective line, or Riemann sphere. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℂ̂ = (ℂ ∪ {∞})
Syntax	crrhat 37483	Syntax for ℝ̂.
class ℝ̂
Definition	df-bj-rrhat 37484	Define the real projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℝ̂ = (ℝ ∪ {∞})
Theorem	bj-rrhatsscchat 37485	The real projective line is included in the complex projective line. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ℝ̂ ⊆ ℂ̂
21.19.6.6  Addition and opposite We define the operations of addition and opposite on the extended complex numbers and on the complex projective line (Riemann sphere) simultaneously, thus "overloading" the operations.
Syntax	caddcc 37486	Syntax for the addition on extended complex numbers.
class +ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-addc 37487	Define the additions on the extended complex numbers (on the subset of (ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) where it makes sense) and on the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). We use the plural in "additions" since these are two different operations, even though +ℂ̅ is overloaded. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ +ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (((ℂ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̅ × ℂ)) ∪ ((ℂ̂ × ℂ̂) ∪ ( I ↾ ℂ∞))) ↦ if(((1st ‘𝑥) = ∞ ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = ∞), ∞, if((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ ℂ, if((2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ ℂ, ⟨((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +R (1st ‘(2nd ‘𝑥))), ((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +R (2nd ‘(2nd ‘𝑥)))⟩, (2nd ‘𝑥)), (1st ‘𝑥))))
Syntax	coppcc 37488	Syntax for negation on the set of extended complex numbers and the complex projective line (Riemann sphere).
class -ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-oppc 37489*	Define the negation (operation giving the opposite) on the set of extended complex numbers and the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ -ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) ↦ if(𝑥 = ∞, ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (℩𝑦 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 +ℂ̅ 𝑦) = 0), (+∞eiτ‘(𝑥 +ℂ̅ ⟨1/2, 0R⟩)))))
21.19.6.7  Order relation on the extended reals In this section, we redefine df-ltxr 11183 without the intermediate step of df-lt 11051.
Syntax	cltxr 37490	Syntax for the standard (strict) order on the extended reals.
class <ℝ̅
Definition	df-bj-lt 37491*	Define the standard (strict) order on the extended reals. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.)
⊢ <ℝ̅ = ({𝑥 ∈ (ℝ̅ × ℝ̅) ∣ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(((1st ‘𝑥) = ⟨𝑦, 0R⟩ ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) = ⟨𝑧, 0R⟩) ∧ 𝑦 <R 𝑧)} ∪ ((({-∞} × ℝ) ∪ (ℝ × {+∞})) ∪ ({-∞} × {+∞})))
21.19.6.8  Argument, multiplication and inverse Since one needs arguments in order to define multiplication in ℂ̅, and one needs complex multiplication in order to define arguments, it would be contrived to construct a whole theory for a temporary multiplication (and temporary powers, then temporary logarithm, and finally temporary argument) before redefining the extended complex multiplication. Therefore, we adopt a two-step process, see df-bj-mulc 37495.
Syntax	carg 37492	Syntax for the argument of a nonzero extended complex number.
class Arg
Definition	df-bj-arg 37493	Define the argument of a nonzero extended complex number. By convention, it has values in (-π, π]. Another convention chooses values in [0, 2π) but the present convention simplifies formulas giving the argument as an arctangent. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.) The "else" case of the second conditional operator, corresponding to infinite extended complex numbers other than -∞, gives a definition depending on the specific definition chosen for these numbers (df-bj-inftyexpitau 37448), and therefore should not be relied upon. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Arg = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∖ {0}) ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (ℑ‘(log‘𝑥)), if(𝑥<ℝ̅0, π, (((1st ‘𝑥) / (2 · π)) − π))))
Syntax	cmulc 37494	Syntax for the multiplication of extended complex numbers.
class ·ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-mulc 37495	Define the multiplication of extended complex numbers and of the complex projective line (Riemann sphere). In our convention, a product with 0 is 0, even when the other factor is infinite. An alternate convention leaves products of 0 with an infinite number undefined since the multiplication is not continuous at these points. Note that our convention entails (0 / 0) = 0 (given df-bj-invc 37497). Note that this definition uses · and Arg and /. Indeed, it would be contrived to bypass ordinary complex multiplication, and the present two-step definition looks like a good compromise. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ·ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ ((ℂ̅ × ℂ̅) ∪ (ℂ̂ × ℂ̂)) ↦ if(((1st ‘𝑥) = 0 ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = 0), 0, if(((1st ‘𝑥) = ∞ ∨ (2nd ‘𝑥) = ∞), ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ (ℂ × ℂ), ((1st ‘𝑥) · (2nd ‘𝑥)), (+∞eiτ‘(((Arg‘(1st ‘𝑥)) +ℂ̅ (Arg‘(2nd ‘𝑥))) / τ))))))
Syntax	cinvc 37496	Syntax for the inverse of nonzero extended complex numbers.
class -1ℂ̅
Definition	df-bj-invc 37497*	Define inversion, which maps a nonzero extended complex number or element of the complex projective line (Riemann sphere) to its inverse. Beware of the overloading: the equality (-1ℂ̅‘0) = ∞ is to be understood in the complex projective line, but 0 as an extended complex number does not have an inverse, which we can state as (-1ℂ̅‘0) ∉ ℂ̅. Note that this definition relies on df-bj-mulc 37495, which does not bypass ordinary complex multiplication, but defines extended complex multiplication on top of it. Therefore, we could have used directly / instead of (℩... ·ℂ̅ ...). (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jun-2019.)
⊢ -1ℂ̅ = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂) ↦ if(𝑥 = 0, ∞, if(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, (℩𝑦 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 ·ℂ̅ 𝑦) = 1), 0)))
21.19.6.9  The canonical bijection from the finite ordinals
Syntax	ciomnn 37498	Syntax for the canonical bijection from (ω ∪ {ω}) onto (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}).
class iω↪ℕ
Definition	df-bj-iomnn 37499*	Definition of the canonical bijection from (ω ∪ {ω}) onto (ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}). To understand this definition, recall that set.mm constructs reals as couples whose first component is a prereal and second component is the zero prereal (in order that one have ℝ ⊆ ℂ), that prereals are equivalence classes of couples of positive reals, the latter are Dedekind cuts of positive rationals, which are equivalence classes of positive ordinals. In partiular, we take the successor ordinal at the beginning and subtract 1 at the end since the intermediate systems contain only (strictly) positive numbers. Note the similarity with df-bj-fractemp 37446 but we did not use the present definition there since we wanted to have defined +∞ first. See bj-iomnnom 37508 for its value at +∞. TODO: Prove ⊢ (iω↪ℕ‘∅) = 0. Define ⊢ ℕ0 = (iω↪ℕ “ ω) and ⊢ ℕ = (ℕ0 ∖ {0}). Prove ⊢ iω↪ℕ:(ω ∪ {ω})–1-1-onto→(ℕ0 ∪ {+∞}) and ⊢ (iω↪ℕ ↾ ω):ω–1-1-onto→ℕ0. Prove that these bijections are respectively an isomorphism of ordered "extended rigs" and of ordered rigs. Prove ⊢ (iω↪ℕ ↾ ω) = rec((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0). (Contributed by BJ, 18-Feb-2023.) The precise definition is irrelevant and should generally not be used. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ iω↪ℕ = ((𝑛 ∈ ω ↦ ⟨[⟨{𝑟 ∈ Q ∣ 𝑟 <Q ⟨suc 𝑛, 1o⟩}, 1P⟩] ~R , 0R⟩) ∪ {⟨ω, +∞⟩})
Theorem	bj-imafv 37500	If the direct image of a singleton under any of two functions is the same, then the values of these functions at the corresponding point agree. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Mar-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐹 “ {𝐴}) = (𝐺 “ {𝐴}) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴))