Theorem bj-exalim 37484

Description: Distribute quantifiers over a nested implication.

This and the following theorems are the general instances of already proved theorems. They could be moved to the main part, before ax-5 1943. I propose to move to the main part: bj-exalim 37484, bj-exalimi 37485, bj-eximcom 37486 bj-exalims 37487, bj-exalimsi 37488, bj-ax12i 37491, bj-ax12wlem 37514, bj-ax12w 37547. A new label is needed for bj-ax12i 37491 and label suggestions are welcome for the others. I also propose to change ¬ ∀𝑥¬ to ∃𝑥 in speimfw 1996 and spimfw 1998 (other spim* theorems use ∃𝑥 and very few theorems in set.mm use ¬ ∀𝑥¬). (Contributed by BJ, 8-Nov-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-exalim	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (∃𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∃𝑥𝜒)))

Proof of Theorem bj-exalim

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pm2.04 91	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
2	1	alimi 1844	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ∀𝑥(𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
3		bj-alexim 37480	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) → (∀𝑥𝜓 → (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜒)))
4		pm2.04 91	. 2 ⊢ ((∀𝑥𝜓 → (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜒)) → (∃𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∃𝑥𝜒)))
5	2, 3, 4	3syl 19	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (∃𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∃𝑥𝜒)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1568  ∃wex 1812

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-ex 1813

This theorem is used by:  bj-exalims  37487