P. 356 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 35501-35600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	taupilem1 35501	Lemma for taupi 35503. A positive real whose cosine is one is at least 2 · π. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ (cos‘𝐴) = 1) → (2 · π) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	taupilem2 35502	Lemma for taupi 35503. The smallest positive real whose cosine is one is at most 2 · π. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.) (Revised by AV, 1-Oct-2020.)
⊢ τ ≤ (2 · π)
Theorem	taupi 35503	Relationship between τ and π. This can be seen as connecting the ratio of a circle's circumference to its radius and the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.) (Revised by AV, 1-Oct-2020.)
⊢ τ = (2 · π)
20.16.0.2  Number theory
Theorem	dfgcd3 35504*	Alternate definition of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (℩𝑑 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑧 ∈ ℤ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑑 ↔ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝑁))))
20.16.0.3  Real numbers
Theorem	irrdifflemf 35505	Lemma for irrdiff 35506. The forward direction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ ℚ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℚ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℚ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑄)) ≠ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑅)))
Theorem	irrdiff 35506*	The irrationals are exactly those reals that are a different distance from every rational. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ ℚ ↔ ∀𝑞 ∈ ℚ ∀𝑟 ∈ ℚ (𝑞 ≠ 𝑟 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑞)) ≠ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑟)))))
Theorem	iccioo01 35507	The closed unit interval is equinumerous to the open unit interval. Based on a Mastodon post by Michael Kinyon. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (0[,]1) ≈ (0(,)1)
20.17  Mathbox for ML
20.17.1  Miscellaneous
Theorem	csbrecsg 35508	Move class substitution in and out of recs. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌recs(𝐹) = recs(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹))
Theorem	csbrdgg 35509	Move class substitution in and out of the recursive function generator. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌rec(𝐹, 𝐼) = rec(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐼))
Theorem	csboprabg 35510*	Move class substitution in and out of class abstractions of nested ordered pairs. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{⟨⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩, 𝑑⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩, 𝑑⟩ ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑})
Theorem	csbmpo123 35511*	Move class substitution in and out of maps-to notation for operations. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝑦 ∈ 𝑌, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐷) = (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑌, 𝑧 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑍 ↦ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))
Theorem	con1bii2 35512	A contraposition inference. (Contributed by ML, 18-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)
Theorem	con2bii2 35513	A contraposition inference. (Contributed by ML, 18-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	vtoclefex 35514*	Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by ML, 17-Oct-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝜑)
Theorem	rnmptsn 35515*	The range of a function mapping to singletons. (Contributed by ML, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥}) = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}}
Theorem	f1omptsnlem 35516*	This is the core of the proof of f1omptsn 35517, but to avoid the distinct variables on the definitions, we split this proof into two. (Contributed by ML, 15-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥})    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝑅
Theorem	f1omptsn 35517*	A function mapping to singletons is bijective onto a set of singletons. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥})    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝑅
Theorem	mptsnunlem 35518*	This is the core of the proof of mptsnun 35519, but to avoid the distinct variables on the definitions, we split this proof into two. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥})    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝐵))
Theorem	mptsnun 35519*	A class 𝐵 is equal to the union of the class of all singletons of elements of 𝐵. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥})    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝐵))
Theorem	dissneqlem 35520*	This is the core of the proof of dissneq 35521, but to avoid the distinct variables on the definitions, we split this proof into two. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴)) → 𝐵 = 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	dissneq 35521*	Any topology that contains every single-point set is the discrete topology. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴)) → 𝐵 = 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	exlimim 35522*	Closed form of exlimimd 35523. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) → 𝜓)
Theorem	exlimimd 35523*	Existential elimination rule of natural deduction. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	exellim 35524*	Closed form of exellimddv 35525. See also exlimim 35522 for a more general theorem. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) → 𝜑)
Theorem	exellimddv 35525*	Eliminate an antecedent when the antecedent is elementhood, deduction version. See exellim 35524 for the closed form, which requires the use of a universal quantifier. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	topdifinfindis 35526*	Part of Exercise 3 of [Munkres] p. 83. The topology of all subsets 𝑥 of 𝐴 such that the complement of 𝑥 in 𝐴 is infinite, or 𝑥 is the empty set, or 𝑥 is all of 𝐴, is the trivial topology when 𝐴 is finite. (Contributed by ML, 14-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝑇 = {∅, 𝐴})
Theorem	topdifinffinlem 35527*	This is the core of the proof of topdifinffin 35528, but to avoid the distinct variables on the definition, we need to split this proof into two. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	topdifinffin 35528*	Part of Exercise 3 of [Munkres] p. 83. The topology of all subsets 𝑥 of 𝐴 such that the complement of 𝑥 in 𝐴 is infinite, or 𝑥 is the empty set, or 𝑥 is all of 𝐴, is a topology only if 𝐴 is finite. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	topdifinf 35529*	Part of Exercise 3 of [Munkres] p. 83. The topology of all subsets 𝑥 of 𝐴 such that the complement of 𝑥 in 𝐴 is infinite, or 𝑥 is the empty set, or 𝑥 is all of 𝐴, is a topology if and only if 𝐴 is finite, in which case it is the trivial topology. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴) → 𝑇 = {∅, 𝐴}))
Theorem	topdifinfeq 35530*	Two different ways of defining the collection from Exercise 3 of [Munkres] p. 83. (Contributed by ML, 18-Jul-2020.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) = ∅ ∨ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) = 𝐴))} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))}
Theorem	icorempo 35531*	Closed-below, open-above intervals of reals. (Contributed by ML, 26-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ([,) ↾ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑥 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑦)})
Theorem	icoreresf 35532	Closed-below, open-above intervals of reals map to subsets of reals. (Contributed by ML, 25-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ([,) ↾ (ℝ × ℝ)):(ℝ × ℝ)⟶𝒫 ℝ
Theorem	icoreval 35533*	Value of the closed-below, open-above interval function on reals. (Contributed by ML, 26-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴[,)𝐵) = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝐵)})
Theorem	icoreelrnab 35534*	Elementhood in the set of closed-below, open-above intervals of reals. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℝ 𝑋 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑏)})
Theorem	isbasisrelowllem1 35535*	Lemma for isbasisrelowl 35538. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑏)}) ∧ (𝑐 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑑 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑐 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑑)})) ∧ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑏 ≤ 𝑑)) → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐼)
Theorem	isbasisrelowllem2 35536*	Lemma for isbasisrelowl 35538. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑏)}) ∧ (𝑐 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑑 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑐 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑑)})) ∧ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑑 ≤ 𝑏)) → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐼)
Theorem	icoreclin 35537*	The set of closed-below, open-above intervals of reals is closed under finite intersection. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐼)
Theorem	isbasisrelowl 35538	The set of all closed-below, open-above intervals of reals form a basis. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐼 ∈ TopBases
Theorem	icoreunrn 35539	The union of all closed-below, open-above intervals of reals is the set of reals. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ ℝ = ∪ 𝐼
Theorem	istoprelowl 35540	The set of all closed-below, open-above intervals of reals generate a topology on the reals. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ (topGen‘𝐼) ∈ (TopOn‘ℝ)
Theorem	icoreelrn 35541*	A class abstraction which is an element of the set of closed-below, open-above intervals of reals. (Contributed by ML, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝐵)} ∈ 𝐼)
Theorem	iooelexlt 35542*	An element of an open interval is not its smallest element. (Contributed by ML, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴(,)𝐵) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐴(,)𝐵)𝑦 < 𝑋)
Theorem	relowlssretop 35543	The lower limit topology on the reals is finer than the standard topology. (Contributed by ML, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ (topGen‘ran (,)) ⊆ (topGen‘𝐼)
Theorem	relowlpssretop 35544	The lower limit topology on the reals is strictly finer than the standard topology. (Contributed by ML, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ))    ⇒   ⊢ (topGen‘ran (,)) ⊊ (topGen‘𝐼)
Theorem	sucneqond 35545	Inequality of an ordinal set with its successor. Does not use the axiom of regularity. (Contributed by ML, 18-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = suc 𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ On)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
Theorem	sucneqoni 35546	Inequality of an ordinal set with its successor. Does not use the axiom of regularity. (Contributed by ML, 18-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑋 = suc 𝑌    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌
Theorem	onsucuni3 35547	If an ordinal number has a predecessor, then it is successor of that predecessor. (Contributed by ML, 17-Oct-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐵) → 𝐵 = suc ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	1oequni2o 35548	The ordinal number 1o is the predecessor of the ordinal number 2o. (Contributed by ML, 19-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 1o = ∪ 2o
Theorem	rdgsucuni 35549	If an ordinal number has a predecessor, the value of the recursive definition generator at that number in terms of its predecessor. (Contributed by ML, 17-Oct-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐵) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐼)‘𝐵) = (𝐹‘(rec(𝐹, 𝐼)‘∪ 𝐵)))
Theorem	rdgeqoa 35550	If a recursive function with an initial value 𝐴 at step 𝑁 is equal to itself with an initial value 𝐵 at step 𝑀, then every finite number of successor steps will also be equal. (Contributed by ML, 21-Oct-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ On ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ω) → ((rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝑁) = (rec(𝐹, 𝐵)‘𝑀) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘(𝑁 +o 𝑋)) = (rec(𝐹, 𝐵)‘(𝑀 +o 𝑋))))
Theorem	elxp8 35551	Membership in a Cartesian product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp7 7875. (Contributed by ML, 19-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (V × 𝐶)))
Theorem	cbveud 35552*	Deduction used to change bound variables in an existential uniqueness quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by ML, 27-Mar-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbvreud 35553*	Deduction used to change bound variables in a restricted existential uniqueness quantifier. (Contributed by ML, 27-Mar-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	difunieq 35554	The difference of unions is a subset of the union of the difference. (Contributed by ML, 29-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ ∪ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)
Theorem	inunissunidif 35555	Theorem about subsets of the difference of unions. (Contributed by ML, 29-Mar-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ ∪ 𝐶) = ∅ → (𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)))
Theorem	rdgellim 35556	Elementhood in a recursive definition at a limit ordinal. (Contributed by ML, 30-Mar-2022.)
⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ On ∧ Lim 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∈ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐶) → 𝑋 ∈ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵)))
Theorem	rdglimss 35557	A recursive definition at a limit ordinal is a superset of itself at any smaller ordinal. (Contributed by ML, 30-Mar-2022.)
⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ On ∧ Lim 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐶) ⊆ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵))
Theorem	rdgssun 35558*	In a recursive definition where each step expands on the previous one using a union, every previous step is a subset of every later step. (Contributed by ML, 1-Apr-2022.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ On ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑋) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝑌) ⊆ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝑋))
Theorem	exrecfnlem 35559*	Lemma for exrecfn 35560. (Contributed by ML, 30-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 ∪ ran (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ↦ 𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑦 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	exrecfn 35560*	Theorem about the existence of infinite recursive sets. 𝑦 should usually be free in 𝐵. (Contributed by ML, 30-Mar-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑦 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	exrecfnpw 35561*	For any base set, a set which contains the powerset of all of its own elements exists. (Contributed by ML, 30-Mar-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝒫 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	finorwe 35562	If the Axiom of Infinity is denied, every total order is a well-order. The notion of a well-order cannot be usefully expressed without the Axiom of Infinity due to the inability to quantify over proper classes. (Contributed by ML, 5-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (¬ ω ∈ V → ( < Or 𝐴 → < We 𝐴))
20.17.2  Cartesian exponentiation
Syntax	cfinxp 35563	Extend the definition of a class to include Cartesian exponentiation.
class (𝑈↑↑𝑁)
Definition	df-finxp 35564*	Define Cartesian exponentiation on a class. Note that this definition is limited to finite exponents, since it is defined using nested ordered pairs. If tuples of infinite length are needed, or if they might be needed in the future, use df-ixp 8695 or df-map 8626 instead. The main advantage of this definition is that it integrates better with functions and relations. For example if 𝑅 is a subset of (𝐴↑↑2o), then df-br 5076 can be used on it, and df-fv 6445 can also be used, and so on. It's also worth keeping in mind that ((𝑈↑↑𝑀) × (𝑈↑↑𝑁)) is generally not equal to (𝑈↑↑(𝑀 +o 𝑁)). This definition is technical. Use finxp1o 35572 and finxpsuc 35578 for a more standard recursive experience. (Contributed by ML, 16-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝑈↑↑𝑁) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ ∅ = (rec((𝑛 ∈ ω, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if((𝑛 = 1o ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈), ∅, if(𝑥 ∈ (V × 𝑈), ⟨∪ 𝑛, (1st ‘𝑥)⟩, ⟨𝑛, 𝑥⟩))), ⟨𝑁, 𝑦⟩)‘𝑁))}
Theorem	dffinxpf 35565*	This theorem is the same as Definition df-finxp 35564, except that the large function is replaced by a class variable for brevity. (Contributed by ML, 24-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ω, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if((𝑛 = 1o ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈), ∅, if(𝑥 ∈ (V × 𝑈), ⟨∪ 𝑛, (1st ‘𝑥)⟩, ⟨𝑛, 𝑥⟩)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑈↑↑𝑁) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ ∅ = (rec(𝐹, ⟨𝑁, 𝑦⟩)‘𝑁))}
Theorem	finxpeq1 35566	Equality theorem for Cartesian exponentiation. (Contributed by ML, 19-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝑈 = 𝑉 → (𝑈↑↑𝑁) = (𝑉↑↑𝑁))
Theorem	finxpeq2 35567	Equality theorem for Cartesian exponentiation. (Contributed by ML, 19-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝑀 = 𝑁 → (𝑈↑↑𝑀) = (𝑈↑↑𝑁))
Theorem	csbfinxpg 35568*	Distribute proper substitution through Cartesian exponentiation. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝑈↑↑𝑁) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑈↑↑⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑁))
Theorem	finxpreclem1 35569*	Lemma for ↑↑ recursion theorems. (Contributed by ML, 17-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 → ∅ = ((𝑛 ∈ ω, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if((𝑛 = 1o ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈), ∅, if(𝑥 ∈ (V × 𝑈), ⟨∪ 𝑛, (1st ‘𝑥)⟩, ⟨𝑛, 𝑥⟩)))‘⟨1o, 𝑋⟩))
Theorem	finxpreclem2 35570*	Lemma for ↑↑ recursion theorems. (Contributed by ML, 17-Oct-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ V ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) → ¬ ∅ = ((𝑛 ∈ ω, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if((𝑛 = 1o ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈), ∅, if(𝑥 ∈ (V × 𝑈), ⟨∪ 𝑛, (1st ‘𝑥)⟩, ⟨𝑛, 𝑥⟩)))‘⟨1o, 𝑋⟩))
Theorem	finxp0 35571	The value of Cartesian exponentiation at zero. (Contributed by ML, 24-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝑈↑↑∅) = ∅
Theorem	finxp1o 35572	The value of Cartesian exponentiation at one. (Contributed by ML, 17-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝑈↑↑1o) = 𝑈
Theorem	finxpreclem3 35573*	Lemma for ↑↑ recursion theorems. (Contributed by ML, 20-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ω, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if((𝑛 = 1o ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈), ∅, if(𝑥 ∈ (V × 𝑈), ⟨∪ 𝑛, (1st ‘𝑥)⟩, ⟨𝑛, 𝑥⟩)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 2o ⊆ 𝑁) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (V × 𝑈)) → ⟨∪ 𝑁, (1st ‘𝑋)⟩ = (𝐹‘⟨𝑁, 𝑋⟩))
Theorem	finxpreclem4 35574*	Lemma for ↑↑ recursion theorems. (Contributed by ML, 23-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ω, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if((𝑛 = 1o ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈), ∅, if(𝑥 ∈ (V × 𝑈), ⟨∪ 𝑛, (1st ‘𝑥)⟩, ⟨𝑛, 𝑥⟩)))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 2o ⊆ 𝑁) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (V × 𝑈)) → (rec(𝐹, ⟨𝑁, 𝑦⟩)‘𝑁) = (rec(𝐹, ⟨∪ 𝑁, (1st ‘𝑦)⟩)‘∪ 𝑁))
Theorem	finxpreclem5 35575*	Lemma for ↑↑ recursion theorems. (Contributed by ML, 24-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ω, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if((𝑛 = 1o ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈), ∅, if(𝑥 ∈ (V × 𝑈), ⟨∪ 𝑛, (1st ‘𝑥)⟩, ⟨𝑛, 𝑥⟩)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ ω ∧ 1o ∈ 𝑛) → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (V × 𝑈) → (𝐹‘⟨𝑛, 𝑥⟩) = ⟨𝑛, 𝑥⟩))
Theorem	finxpreclem6 35576*	Lemma for ↑↑ recursion theorems. (Contributed by ML, 24-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ω, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if((𝑛 = 1o ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈), ∅, if(𝑥 ∈ (V × 𝑈), ⟨∪ 𝑛, (1st ‘𝑥)⟩, ⟨𝑛, 𝑥⟩)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 1o ∈ 𝑁) → (𝑈↑↑𝑁) ⊆ (V × 𝑈))
Theorem	finxpsuclem 35577*	Lemma for finxpsuc 35578. (Contributed by ML, 24-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ω, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if((𝑛 = 1o ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈), ∅, if(𝑥 ∈ (V × 𝑈), ⟨∪ 𝑛, (1st ‘𝑥)⟩, ⟨𝑛, 𝑥⟩)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 1o ⊆ 𝑁) → (𝑈↑↑suc 𝑁) = ((𝑈↑↑𝑁) × 𝑈))
Theorem	finxpsuc 35578	The value of Cartesian exponentiation at a successor. (Contributed by ML, 24-Oct-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑁 ≠ ∅) → (𝑈↑↑suc 𝑁) = ((𝑈↑↑𝑁) × 𝑈))
Theorem	finxp2o 35579	The value of Cartesian exponentiation at two. (Contributed by ML, 19-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝑈↑↑2o) = (𝑈 × 𝑈)
Theorem	finxp3o 35580	The value of Cartesian exponentiation at three. (Contributed by ML, 24-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝑈↑↑3o) = ((𝑈 × 𝑈) × 𝑈)
Theorem	finxpnom 35581	Cartesian exponentiation when the exponent is not a natural number defaults to the empty set. (Contributed by ML, 24-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑁 ∈ ω → (𝑈↑↑𝑁) = ∅)
Theorem	finxp00 35582	Cartesian exponentiation of the empty set to any power is the empty set. (Contributed by ML, 24-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (∅↑↑𝑁) = ∅
20.17.3  Topology
Theorem	iunctb2 35583	Using the axiom of countable choice ax-cc 10200, the countable union of countable sets is countable. See iunctb 10339 for a somewhat more general theorem. (Contributed by ML, 10-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ω 𝐵 ≼ ω → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ ω 𝐵 ≼ ω)
Theorem	domalom 35584*	A class which dominates every natural number is not finite. (Contributed by ML, 14-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ ω 𝑛 ≼ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	isinf2 35585*	The converse of isinf 9045. Any set that is not finite is literally infinite, in the sense that it contains subsets of arbitrarily large finite cardinality. (It cannot be proven that the set has countably infinite subsets unless AC is invoked.) The proof does not require the Axiom of Infinity. (Contributed by ML, 14-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝑛) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	ctbssinf 35586*	Using the axiom of choice, any infinite class has a countable subset. (Contributed by ML, 14-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ ω))
Theorem	ralssiun 35587*	The index set of an indexed union is a subset of the union when each 𝐵 contains its index. (Contributed by ML, 16-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
Theorem	nlpineqsn 35588*	For every point 𝑝 of a subset 𝐴 of 𝑋 with no limit points, there exists an open set 𝑛 that intersects 𝐴 only at 𝑝. (Contributed by ML, 23-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ ((limPt‘𝐽)‘𝐴) = ∅) → ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑝 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ (𝑛 ∩ 𝐴) = {𝑝}))
Theorem	nlpfvineqsn 35589*	Given a subset 𝐴 of 𝑋 with no limit points, there exists a function from each point 𝑝 of 𝐴 to an open set intersecting 𝐴 only at 𝑝. This proof uses the axiom of choice. (Contributed by ML, 23-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ ((limPt‘𝐽)‘𝐴) = ∅) → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑓‘𝑝) ∩ 𝐴) = {𝑝})))
Theorem	fvineqsnf1 35590*	A theorem about functions where the image of every point intersects the domain only at that point. If 𝐽 is a topology and 𝐴 is a set with no limit points, then there exists an 𝐹 such that this antecedent is true. See nlpfvineqsn 35589 for a proof of this fact. (Contributed by ML, 23-Mar-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐹‘𝑝) ∩ 𝐴) = {𝑝}) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐽)
Theorem	fvineqsneu 35591*	A theorem about functions where the image of every point intersects the domain only at that point. (Contributed by ML, 27-Mar-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐹‘𝑝) ∩ 𝐴) = {𝑝}) → ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐹 𝑞 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	fvineqsneq 35592*	A theorem about functions where the image of every point intersects the domain only at that point. (Contributed by ML, 28-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐹‘𝑝) ∩ 𝐴) = {𝑝}) ∧ (𝑍 ⊆ ran 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝑍)) → 𝑍 = ran 𝐹)
20.17.3.1  Pi-base theorems This section contains a few proofs of theorems found in the pi-base database. The pi-base site can be found at <https://topology.pi-base.org/>. Definitions of topological properties are theorems labeled pibpN, where N is the property number in pi-base. For example, pibp19 35594 defines countably compact topologies. Proofs of theorems are similarly labeled pibtN, for example pibt2 35597.
Theorem	pibp16 35593*	Property P000016 of pi-base. The class of compact topologies. A space 𝑋 is compact if every open cover of 𝑋 has a finite subcover. This theorem is just a relabeled copy of iscmp 22548. (Contributed by ML, 8-Dec-2020.)
⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Comp ↔ (𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐽(𝑋 = ∪ 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ (𝒫 𝑦 ∩ Fin)𝑋 = ∪ 𝑧)))
Theorem	pibp19 35594*	Property P000019 of pi-base. The class of countably compact topologies. A space 𝑋 is countably compact if every countable open cover of 𝑋 has a finite subcover. (Contributed by ML, 8-Dec-2020.)
⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∈ Top ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝑥((∪ 𝑥 = ∪ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≼ ω) → ∃𝑧 ∈ (𝒫 𝑦 ∩ Fin)∪ 𝑥 = ∪ 𝑧)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐽((𝑋 = ∪ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≼ ω) → ∃𝑧 ∈ (𝒫 𝑦 ∩ Fin)𝑋 = ∪ 𝑧)))
Theorem	pibp21 35595*	Property P000021 of pi-base. The class of weakly countably compact topologies, or limit point compact topologies. A space 𝑋 is weakly countably compact if every infinite subset of 𝑋 has a limit point. (Contributed by ML, 9-Dec-2020.)
⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑥 ∈ Top ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝒫 ∪ 𝑥 ∖ Fin)∃𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥𝑧 ∈ ((limPt‘𝑥)‘𝑦)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ 𝑊 ↔ (𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∖ Fin)∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 𝑧 ∈ ((limPt‘𝐽)‘𝑦)))
Theorem	pibt1 35596*	Theorem T000001 of pi-base. A compact topology is also countably compact. See pibp16 35593 and pibp19 35594 for the definitions of the relevant properties. (Contributed by ML, 8-Dec-2020.)
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∈ Top ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝑥((∪ 𝑥 = ∪ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≼ ω) → ∃𝑧 ∈ (𝒫 𝑦 ∩ Fin)∪ 𝑥 = ∪ 𝑧)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Comp → 𝐽 ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	pibt2 35597*	Theorem T000002 of pi-base, a countably compact topology is also weakly countably compact. See pibp19 35594 and pibp21 35595 for the definitions of the relevant properties. This proof uses the axiom of choice. (Contributed by ML, 30-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∈ Top ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝑥((∪ 𝑥 = ∪ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≼ ω) → ∃𝑧 ∈ (𝒫 𝑦 ∩ Fin)∪ 𝑥 = ∪ 𝑧)}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑥 ∈ Top ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝒫 ∪ 𝑥 ∖ Fin)∃𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥𝑧 ∈ ((limPt‘𝑥)‘𝑦)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑊)
20.18  Mathbox for Wolf Lammen
Theorem	wl-section-prop 35598	Intuitionistic logic is now developed separately, so we need not first focus on intuitionally valid axioms ax-1 6 and ax-2 7 any longer. Alternatively, I start from Jan Lukasiewicz's axiom system here, i.e., ax-mp 5, ax-luk1 35599, ax-luk2 35600 and ax-luk3 35601. I rather copy this system than use luk-1 1658 to luk-3 1660, since the latter are theorems, while we need axioms here. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 23-Feb-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Axiom	ax-luk1 35599	1 of 3 axioms for propositional calculus due to Lukasiewicz. Copy of luk-1 1658 and imim1 83, but introduced as an axiom. It focuses on a basic property of a valid implication, namely that the consequent has to be true whenever the antecedent is. So if 𝜑 and 𝜓 are somehow parametrized expressions, then 𝜑 → 𝜓 states that 𝜑 strengthen 𝜓, in that 𝜑 holds only for a (often proper) subset of those parameters making 𝜓 true. We easily accept, that when 𝜓 is stronger than 𝜒 and, at the same time 𝜑 is stronger than 𝜓, then 𝜑 must be stronger than 𝜒. This transitivity is expressed in this axiom. A particular result of this strengthening property comes into play if the antecedent holds unconditionally. Then the consequent must hold unconditionally as well. This specialization is the foundational idea behind logical conclusion. Such conclusion is best expressed in so-called immediate versions of this axiom like imim1i 63 or syl 17. Note that these forms are weaker replacements (i.e. just frequent specialization) of the closed form presented here, hence a mere convenience. We can identify in this axiom up to three antecedents, followed by a consequent. The number of antecedents is not really fixed; the fewer we are willing to "see", the more complex the consequent grows. On the other side, since 𝜒 is a variable capable of assuming an implication itself, we might find even more antecedents after some substitution of 𝜒. This shows that the ideas of antecedent and consequent in expressions like this depends on, and can adapt to, our current interpretation of the whole expression. In this axiom, up to two antecedents happen to be of complex nature themselves, i.e. are an embedded implication. Logically, this axiom is a compact notion of simpler expressions, which I will later coin implication chains. Herein all antecedents and the consequent appear as simple variables, or their negation. Any propositional expression is equivalent to a set of such chains. This axiom, for example, is dissected into following chains, from which it can be recovered losslessly: (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))); (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))); (𝜓 → (¬ 𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))); (¬ 𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))). (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 17-Dec-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Axiom	ax-luk2 35600	2 of 3 axioms for propositional calculus due to Lukasiewicz. Copy of luk-2 1659 or pm2.18 128, but introduced as an axiom. The core idea behind this axiom is, that if something can be implied from both an antecedent, and separately from its negation, then the antecedent is irrelevant to the consequent, and can safely be dropped. This is perhaps better seen from the following slightly extended version (related to pm2.65 192): ((𝜑 → 𝜑) → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) → 𝜑)). (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 17-Dec-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) → 𝜑)