P. 356 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 35501-35600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	mvhfval 35501*	Value of the function mapping variables to their corresponding variable expressions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (mType‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (mVH‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ ⟨(𝑌‘𝑣), ⟨“𝑣”⟩⟩)
Theorem	mvhval 35502	Value of the function mapping variables to their corresponding variable expressions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (mType‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (mVH‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐻‘𝑋) = ⟨(𝑌‘𝑋), ⟨“𝑋”⟩⟩)
Theorem	mpstval 35503*	A pre-statement is an ordered triple, whose first member is a symmetric set of disjoint variable conditions, whose second member is a finite set of expressions, and whose third member is an expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (mDV‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑃 = (({𝑑 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ ◡𝑑 = 𝑑} × (𝒫 𝐸 ∩ Fin)) × 𝐸)
Theorem	elmpst 35504	Property of being a pre-statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (mDV‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐷, 𝐻, 𝐴⟩ ∈ 𝑃 ↔ ((𝐷 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ ◡𝐷 = 𝐷) ∧ (𝐻 ⊆ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ Fin) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	msrfval 35505*	Value of the reduct of a pre-statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (mVars‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑠 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ ⦋(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑠)) / ℎ⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑠) / 𝑎⦌⟨((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑠)) ∩ ⦋∪ (𝑉 “ (ℎ ∪ {𝑎})) / 𝑧⦌(𝑧 × 𝑧)), ℎ, 𝑎⟩)
Theorem	msrval 35506	Value of the reduct of a pre-statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (mVars‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ∪ (𝑉 “ (𝐻 ∪ {𝐴}))    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐷, 𝐻, 𝐴⟩ ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑅‘⟨𝐷, 𝐻, 𝐴⟩) = ⟨(𝐷 ∩ (𝑍 × 𝑍)), 𝐻, 𝐴⟩)
Theorem	mpstssv 35507	A pre-statement is an ordered triple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑃 ⊆ ((V × V) × V)
Theorem	mpst123 35508	Decompose a pre-statement into a triple of values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 → 𝑋 = ⟨(1st ‘(1st ‘𝑋)), (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑋)), (2nd ‘𝑋)⟩)
Theorem	mpstrcl 35509	The elements of a pre-statement are sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐷, 𝐻, 𝐴⟩ ∈ 𝑃 → (𝐷 ∈ V ∧ 𝐻 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V))
Theorem	msrf 35510	The reduct of a pre-statement is a pre-statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑅:𝑃⟶𝑃
Theorem	msrrcl 35511	If 𝑋 and 𝑌 have the same reduct, then one is a pre-statement iff the other is. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅‘𝑋) = (𝑅‘𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ↔ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃))
Theorem	mstaval 35512	Value of the set of statements. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (mStat‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 = ran 𝑅
Theorem	msrid 35513	The reduct of a statement is itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (mStat‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝑅‘𝑋) = 𝑋)
Theorem	msrfo 35514	The reduct of a pre-statement is a statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (mStat‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑅:𝑃–onto→𝑆
Theorem	mstapst 35515	A statement is a pre-statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (mStat‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑃
Theorem	elmsta 35516	Property of being a statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (mStat‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVars‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ∪ (𝑉 “ (𝐻 ∪ {𝐴}))    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐷, 𝐻, 𝐴⟩ ∈ 𝑆 ↔ (⟨𝐷, 𝐻, 𝐴⟩ ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝑍 × 𝑍)))
Theorem	ismfs 35517*	A formal system is a tuple ⟨mCN, mVR, mType, mVT, mTC, mAx⟩ such that: mCN and mVR are disjoint; mType is a function from mVR to mVT; mVT is a subset of mTC; mAx is a set of statements; and for each variable typecode, there are infinitely many variables of that type. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (mType‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (mVT‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (mTC‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (mAx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (mStat‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝑇 ∈ mFS ↔ (((𝐶 ∩ 𝑉) = ∅ ∧ 𝑌:𝑉⟶𝐾) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐹 ¬ (◡𝑌 “ {𝑣}) ∈ Fin))))
Theorem	mfsdisj 35518	The constants and variables of a formal system are disjoint. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ mFS → (𝐶 ∩ 𝑉) = ∅)
Theorem	mtyf2 35519	The type function maps variables to typecodes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (mTC‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (mType‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ mFS → 𝑌:𝑉⟶𝐾)
Theorem	mtyf 35520	The type function maps variables to variable typecodes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (mVT‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (mType‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ mFS → 𝑌:𝑉⟶𝐹)
Theorem	mvtss 35521	The set of variable typecodes is a subset of all typecodes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mVT‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (mTC‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ mFS → 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐾)
Theorem	maxsta 35522	An axiom is a statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (mAx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (mStat‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ mFS → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑆)
Theorem	mvtinf 35523	Each variable typecode has infinitely many variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mVT‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (mType‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ mFS ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐹) → ¬ (◡𝑌 “ {𝑋}) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	msubff1 35524	When restricted to complete mappings, the substitution-producing function is one-to-one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ mFS → (𝑆 ↾ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)):(𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)–1-1→(𝐸 ↑m 𝐸))
Theorem	msubff1o 35525	When restricted to complete mappings, the substitution-producing function is bijective to the set of all substitutions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ mFS → (𝑆 ↾ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)):(𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)–1-1-onto→ran 𝑆)
Theorem	mvhf 35526	The function mapping variables to variable expressions is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (mVH‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ mFS → 𝐻:𝑉⟶𝐸)
Theorem	mvhf1 35527	The function mapping variables to variable expressions is one-to-one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (mVH‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ mFS → 𝐻:𝑉–1-1→𝐸)
Theorem	msubvrs 35528*	The set of variables in a substitution is the union, indexed by the variables in the original expression, of the variables in the substitution to that variable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVars‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (mVH‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ mFS ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ran 𝑆 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐸) → (𝑉‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑉‘𝑋)(𝑉‘(𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑥))))
Theorem	mclsrcl 35529	Reverse closure for the closure function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCls‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐾𝐶𝐵) → (𝑇 ∈ V ∧ 𝐾 ⊆ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐸))
Theorem	mclsssvlem 35530*	Lemma for mclsssv 35532. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCls‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ mFS)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ⊆ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (mVH‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (mAx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVars‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∩ {𝑐 ∣ ((𝐵 ∪ ran 𝐻) ⊆ 𝑐 ∧ ∀𝑚∀𝑜∀𝑝(⟨𝑚, 𝑜, 𝑝⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑠 ∈ ran 𝑆(((𝑠 “ (𝑜 ∪ ran 𝐻)) ⊆ 𝑐 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑚𝑦 → ((𝑉‘(𝑠‘(𝐻‘𝑥))) × (𝑉‘(𝑠‘(𝐻‘𝑦)))) ⊆ 𝐾)) → (𝑠‘𝑝) ∈ 𝑐)))} ⊆ 𝐸)
Theorem	mclsval 35531*	The function mapping variables to variable expressions is one-to-one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCls‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ mFS)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ⊆ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (mVH‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (mAx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVars‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾𝐶𝐵) = ∩ {𝑐 ∣ ((𝐵 ∪ ran 𝐻) ⊆ 𝑐 ∧ ∀𝑚∀𝑜∀𝑝(⟨𝑚, 𝑜, 𝑝⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑠 ∈ ran 𝑆(((𝑠 “ (𝑜 ∪ ran 𝐻)) ⊆ 𝑐 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑚𝑦 → ((𝑉‘(𝑠‘(𝐻‘𝑥))) × (𝑉‘(𝑠‘(𝐻‘𝑦)))) ⊆ 𝐾)) → (𝑠‘𝑝) ∈ 𝑐)))})
Theorem	mclsssv 35532	The closure of a set of expressions is a set of expressions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCls‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ mFS)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ⊆ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾𝐶𝐵) ⊆ 𝐸)
Theorem	ssmclslem 35533	Lemma for ssmcls 35535. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCls‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ mFS)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ⊆ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (mVH‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∪ ran 𝐻) ⊆ (𝐾𝐶𝐵))
Theorem	vhmcls 35534	All variable hypotheses are in the closure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCls‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ mFS)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ⊆ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (mVH‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻‘𝑋) ∈ (𝐾𝐶𝐵))
Theorem	ssmcls 35535	The original expressions are also in the closure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCls‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ mFS)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ⊆ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐾𝐶𝐵))
Theorem	ss2mcls 35536	The closure is monotonic under subsets of the original set of expressions and the set of disjoint variable conditions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCls‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ mFS)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ⊆ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐶𝑌) ⊆ (𝐾𝐶𝐵))
Theorem	mclsax 35537*	The closure is closed under axiom application. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCls‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ mFS)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ⊆ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (mAx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (mSubst‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (mVH‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (mVars‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑀, 𝑂, 𝑃⟩ ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑂) → (𝑆‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐾𝐶𝐵))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑆‘(𝐻‘𝑣)) ∈ (𝐾𝐶𝐵))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥𝑀𝑦 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (𝑊‘(𝑆‘(𝐻‘𝑥))) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑊‘(𝑆‘(𝐻‘𝑦))))) → 𝑎𝐾𝑏)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝑃) ∈ (𝐾𝐶𝐵))
Theorem	mclsind 35538*	Induction theorem for closure: any other set 𝑄 closed under the axioms and the hypotheses contains all the elements of the closure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCls‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ mFS)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ⊆ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (mAx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (mSubst‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (mVH‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (mVars‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑄)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐻‘𝑣) ∈ 𝑄)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (⟨𝑚, 𝑜, 𝑝⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ ran 𝐿 ∧ (𝑠 “ (𝑜 ∪ ran 𝐻)) ⊆ 𝑄) ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑚𝑦 → ((𝑊‘(𝑠‘(𝐻‘𝑥))) × (𝑊‘(𝑠‘(𝐻‘𝑦)))) ⊆ 𝐾)) → (𝑠‘𝑝) ∈ 𝑄)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾𝐶𝐵) ⊆ 𝑄)
Theorem	mppspstlem 35539*	Lemma for mppspst 35542. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCls‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑑, ℎ⟩, 𝑎⟩ ∣ (⟨𝑑, ℎ, 𝑎⟩ ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (𝑑𝐶ℎ))} ⊆ 𝑃
Theorem	mppsval 35540*	Definition of a provable pre-statement, essentially just a reorganization of the arguments of df-mcls . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCls‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐽 = {⟨⟨𝑑, ℎ⟩, 𝑎⟩ ∣ (⟨𝑑, ℎ, 𝑎⟩ ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (𝑑𝐶ℎ))}
Theorem	elmpps 35541	Definition of a provable pre-statement, essentially just a reorganization of the arguments of df-mcls . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCls‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐷, 𝐻, 𝐴⟩ ∈ 𝐽 ↔ (⟨𝐷, 𝐻, 𝐴⟩ ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐷𝐶𝐻)))
Theorem	mppspst 35542	A provable pre-statement is a pre-statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (mPreSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐽 ⊆ 𝑃
Theorem	mthmval 35543	A theorem is a pre-statement, whose reduct is also the reduct of a provable pre-statement. Unlike the difference between pre-statement and statement, this application of the reduct is not necessarily trivial: there are theorems that are not themselves provable but are provable once enough "dummy variables" are introduced. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (mThm‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑈 = (◡𝑅 “ (𝑅 “ 𝐽))
Theorem	elmthm 35544*	A theorem is a pre-statement, whose reduct is also the reduct of a provable pre-statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (mThm‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑅‘𝑥) = (𝑅‘𝑋))
Theorem	mthmi 35545	A statement whose reduct is the reduct of a provable pre-statement is a theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (mThm‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐽 ∧ (𝑅‘𝑋) = (𝑅‘𝑌)) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	mthmsta 35546	A theorem is a pre-statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑈 = (mThm‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (mPreSt‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑆
Theorem	mppsthm 35547	A provable pre-statement is a theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (mThm‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐽 ⊆ 𝑈
Theorem	mthmblem 35548	Lemma for mthmb 35549. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (mThm‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅‘𝑋) = (𝑅‘𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈))
Theorem	mthmb 35549	If two statements have the same reduct then one is a theorem iff the other is. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (mThm‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅‘𝑋) = (𝑅‘𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈))
Theorem	mthmpps 35550	Given a theorem, there is an explicitly definable witnessing provable pre-statement for the provability of the theorem. (However, this pre-statement requires infinitely many disjoint variable conditions, which is sometimes inconvenient.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (mStRed‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (mThm‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVars‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ∪ (𝑉 “ (𝐻 ∪ {𝐴}))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝐶 ∪ (𝐷 ∖ (𝑍 × 𝑍)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ mFS → (⟨𝐶, 𝐻, 𝐴⟩ ∈ 𝑈 ↔ (⟨𝑀, 𝐻, 𝐴⟩ ∈ 𝐽 ∧ (𝑅‘⟨𝑀, 𝐻, 𝐴⟩) = (𝑅‘⟨𝐶, 𝐻, 𝐴⟩))))
Theorem	mclsppslem 35551*	The closure is closed under application of provable pre-statements. (Compare mclsax 35537.) This theorem is what justifies the treatment of theorems as "equivalent" to axioms once they have been proven: the composition of one theorem in the proof of another yields a theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCls‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ mFS)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ⊆ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (mSubst‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (mVH‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (mVars‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑀, 𝑂, 𝑃⟩ ∈ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑂) → (𝑆‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐾𝐶𝐵))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑆‘(𝐻‘𝑣)) ∈ (𝐾𝐶𝐵))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥𝑀𝑦 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (𝑊‘(𝑆‘(𝐻‘𝑥))) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑊‘(𝑆‘(𝐻‘𝑦))))) → 𝑎𝐾𝑏)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑚, 𝑜, 𝑝⟩ ∈ (mAx‘𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑠 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑠 “ (𝑜 ∪ ran 𝐻)) ⊆ (◡𝑆 “ (𝐾𝐶𝐵)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝑧𝑚𝑤 → ((𝑊‘(𝑠‘(𝐻‘𝑧))) × (𝑊‘(𝑠‘(𝐻‘𝑤)))) ⊆ 𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑠‘𝑝) ∈ (◡𝑆 “ (𝐾𝐶𝐵)))
Theorem	mclspps 35552*	The closure is closed under application of provable pre-statements. (Compare mclsax 35537.) This theorem is what justifies the treatment of theorems as "equivalent" to axioms once they have been proven: the composition of one theorem in the proof of another yields a theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCls‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ mFS)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ⊆ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (mPPSt‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (mSubst‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (mVH‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (mVars‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑀, 𝑂, 𝑃⟩ ∈ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑂) → (𝑆‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐾𝐶𝐵))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑆‘(𝐻‘𝑣)) ∈ (𝐾𝐶𝐵))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥𝑀𝑦 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (𝑊‘(𝑆‘(𝐻‘𝑥))) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑊‘(𝑆‘(𝐻‘𝑦))))) → 𝑎𝐾𝑏)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝑃) ∈ (𝐾𝐶𝐵))
21.6.14  Grammatical formal systems
Syntax	cm0s 35553	Mapping expressions to statements.
class m0St
Syntax	cmsa 35554	The set of syntax axioms.
class mSA
Syntax	cmwgfs 35555	The set of weakly grammatical formal systems.
class mWGFS
Syntax	cmsy 35556	The syntax typecode function.
class mSyn
Syntax	cmesy 35557	The syntax typecode function for expressions.
class mESyn
Syntax	cmgfs 35558	The set of grammatical formal systems.
class mGFS
Syntax	cmtree 35559	The set of proof trees.
class mTree
Syntax	cmst 35560	The set of syntax trees.
class mST
Syntax	cmsax 35561	The indexing set for a syntax axiom.
class mSAX
Syntax	cmufs 35562	The set of unambiguous formal systems.
class mUFS
Definition	df-m0s 35563	Define a function mapping expressions to statements. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ m0St = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ ⟨∅, ∅, 𝑎⟩)
Definition	df-msa 35564*	Define the set of syntax axioms. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mSA = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ {𝑎 ∈ (mEx‘𝑡) ∣ ((m0St‘𝑎) ∈ (mAx‘𝑡) ∧ (1st ‘𝑎) ∈ (mVT‘𝑡) ∧ Fun (◡(2nd ‘𝑎) ↾ (mVR‘𝑡)))})
Definition	df-mwgfs 35565*	Define the set of weakly grammatical formal systems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mWGFS = {𝑡 ∈ mFS ∣ ∀𝑑∀ℎ∀𝑎((⟨𝑑, ℎ, 𝑎⟩ ∈ (mAx‘𝑡) ∧ (1st ‘𝑎) ∈ (mVT‘𝑡)) → ∃𝑠 ∈ ran (mSubst‘𝑡)𝑎 ∈ (𝑠 “ (mSA‘𝑡)))}
Definition	df-msyn 35566	Define the syntax typecode function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mSyn = Slot 6
Definition	df-mesyn 35567*	Define the syntax typecode function for expressions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jun-2023.)
⊢ mESyn = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑐 ∈ (mTC‘𝑡), 𝑒 ∈ (mREx‘𝑡) ↦ (((mSyn‘𝑡)‘𝑐)m0St𝑒)))
Definition	df-mgfs 35568*	Define the set of grammatical formal systems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jun-2023.)
⊢ mGFS = {𝑡 ∈ mWGFS ∣ ((mSyn‘𝑡):(mTC‘𝑡)⟶(mVT‘𝑡) ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ (mVT‘𝑡)((mSyn‘𝑡)‘𝑐) = 𝑐 ∧ ∀𝑑∀ℎ∀𝑎(⟨𝑑, ℎ, 𝑎⟩ ∈ (mAx‘𝑡) → ∀𝑒 ∈ (ℎ ∪ {𝑎})((mESyn‘𝑡)‘𝑒) ∈ (mPPSt‘𝑡)))}
Definition	df-mtree 35569*	Define the set of proof trees. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mTree = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑑 ∈ 𝒫 (mDV‘𝑡), ℎ ∈ 𝒫 (mEx‘𝑡) ↦ ∩ {𝑟 ∣ (∀𝑒 ∈ ran (mVH‘𝑡)𝑒𝑟⟨(m0St‘𝑒), ∅⟩ ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ ℎ 𝑒𝑟⟨((mStRed‘𝑡)‘⟨𝑑, ℎ, 𝑒⟩), ∅⟩ ∧ ∀𝑚∀𝑜∀𝑝(⟨𝑚, 𝑜, 𝑝⟩ ∈ (mAx‘𝑡) → ∀𝑠 ∈ ran (mSubst‘𝑡)(∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑚𝑦 → (((mVars‘𝑡)‘(𝑠‘((mVH‘𝑡)‘𝑥))) × ((mVars‘𝑡)‘(𝑠‘((mVH‘𝑡)‘𝑦)))) ⊆ 𝑑) → ({(𝑠‘𝑝)} × X𝑒 ∈ (𝑜 ∪ ((mVH‘𝑡) “ ∪ ((mVars‘𝑡) “ (𝑜 ∪ {𝑝}))))(𝑟 “ {(𝑠‘𝑒)})) ⊆ 𝑟)))}))
Definition	df-mst 35570	Define the function mapping syntax expressions to syntax trees. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mST = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ ((∅(mTree‘𝑡)∅) ↾ ((mEx‘𝑡) ↾ (mVT‘𝑡))))
Definition	df-msax 35571*	Define the indexing set for a syntax axiom's representation in a tree. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mSAX = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑝 ∈ (mSA‘𝑡) ↦ ((mVH‘𝑡) “ ((mVars‘𝑡)‘𝑝))))
Definition	df-mufs 35572	Define the set of unambiguous formal systems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mUFS = {𝑡 ∈ mGFS ∣ Fun (mST‘𝑡)}
21.6.15  Models of formal systems
Syntax	cmuv 35573	The universe of a model.
class mUV
Syntax	cmvl 35574	The set of valuations.
class mVL
Syntax	cmvsb 35575	Substitution for a valuation.
class mVSubst
Syntax	cmfsh 35576	The freshness relation of a model.
class mFresh
Syntax	cmfr 35577	The set of freshness relations.
class mFRel
Syntax	cmevl 35578	The evaluation function of a model.
class mEval
Syntax	cmdl 35579	The set of models.
class mMdl
Syntax	cusyn 35580	The syntax function applied to elements of the model.
class mUSyn
Syntax	cgmdl 35581	The set of models in a grammatical formal system.
class mGMdl
Syntax	cmitp 35582	The interpretation function of the model.
class mItp
Syntax	cmfitp 35583	The evaluation function derived from the interpretation.
class mFromItp
Definition	df-muv 35584	Define the universe of a model. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mUV = Slot 7
Definition	df-mfsh 35585	Define the freshness relation of a model. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mFresh = Slot ;19
Definition	df-mevl 35586	Define the evaluation function of a model. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mEval = Slot ;20
Definition	df-mvl 35587*	Define the set of valuations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mVL = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ X𝑣 ∈ (mVR‘𝑡)((mUV‘𝑡) “ {((mType‘𝑡)‘𝑣)}))
Definition	df-mvsb 35588*	Define substitution applied to a valuation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mVSubst = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ {⟨⟨𝑠, 𝑚⟩, 𝑥⟩ ∣ ((𝑠 ∈ ran (mSubst‘𝑡) ∧ 𝑚 ∈ (mVL‘𝑡)) ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ (mVR‘𝑡)𝑚dom (mEval‘𝑡)(𝑠‘((mVH‘𝑡)‘𝑣)) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑣 ∈ (mVR‘𝑡) ↦ (𝑚(mEval‘𝑡)(𝑠‘((mVH‘𝑡)‘𝑣)))))})
Definition	df-mfrel 35589*	Define the set of freshness relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mFRel = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ {𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 ((mUV‘𝑡) × (mUV‘𝑡)) ∣ (◡𝑟 = 𝑟 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ (mVT‘𝑡)∀𝑤 ∈ (𝒫 (mUV‘𝑡) ∩ Fin)∃𝑣 ∈ ((mUV‘𝑡) “ {𝑐})𝑤 ⊆ (𝑟 “ {𝑣}))})
Definition	df-mdl 35590*	Define the set of models of a formal system. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mMdl = {𝑡 ∈ mFS ∣ [(mUV‘𝑡) / 𝑢][(mEx‘𝑡) / 𝑥][(mVL‘𝑡) / 𝑣][(mEval‘𝑡) / 𝑛][(mFresh‘𝑡) / 𝑓]((𝑢 ⊆ ((mTC‘𝑡) × V) ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (mFRel‘𝑡) ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (𝑢 ↑pm (𝑣 × (mEx‘𝑡)))) ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑣 ((∀𝑒 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑛 “ {⟨𝑚, 𝑒⟩}) ⊆ (𝑢 “ {(1st ‘𝑒)}) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ (mVR‘𝑡)⟨𝑚, ((mVH‘𝑡)‘𝑦)⟩𝑛(𝑚‘𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑑∀ℎ∀𝑎(⟨𝑑, ℎ, 𝑎⟩ ∈ (mAx‘𝑡) → ((∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝑦𝑑𝑧 → (𝑚‘𝑦)𝑓(𝑚‘𝑧)) ∧ ℎ ⊆ (dom 𝑛 “ {𝑚})) → 𝑚dom 𝑛 𝑎))) ∧ (∀𝑠 ∈ ran (mSubst‘𝑡)∀𝑒 ∈ (mEx‘𝑡)∀𝑦(⟨𝑠, 𝑚⟩(mVSubst‘𝑡)𝑦 → (𝑛 “ {⟨𝑚, (𝑠‘𝑒)⟩}) = (𝑛 “ {⟨𝑦, 𝑒⟩})) ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝑣 ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝑥 ((𝑚 ↾ ((mVars‘𝑡)‘𝑒)) = (𝑝 ↾ ((mVars‘𝑡)‘𝑒)) → (𝑛 “ {⟨𝑚, 𝑒⟩}) = (𝑛 “ {⟨𝑝, 𝑒⟩})) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝑥 ((𝑚 “ ((mVars‘𝑡)‘𝑒)) ⊆ (𝑓 “ {𝑦}) → (𝑛 “ {⟨𝑚, 𝑒⟩}) ⊆ (𝑓 “ {𝑦})))))}
Definition	df-musyn 35591*	Define the syntax typecode function for the model universe. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mUSyn = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑣 ∈ (mUV‘𝑡) ↦ ⟨((mSyn‘𝑡)‘(1st ‘𝑣)), (2nd ‘𝑣)⟩))
Definition	df-gmdl 35592*	Define the set of models of a grammatical formal system. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mGMdl = {𝑡 ∈ (mGFS ∩ mMdl) ∣ (∀𝑐 ∈ (mTC‘𝑡)((mUV‘𝑡) “ {𝑐}) ⊆ ((mUV‘𝑡) “ {((mSyn‘𝑡)‘𝑐)}) ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ (mUV‘𝑐)∀𝑤 ∈ (mUV‘𝑐)(𝑣(mFresh‘𝑡)𝑤 ↔ 𝑣(mFresh‘𝑡)((mUSyn‘𝑡)‘𝑤)) ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ (mVL‘𝑡)∀𝑒 ∈ (mEx‘𝑡)((mEval‘𝑡) “ {⟨𝑚, 𝑒⟩}) = (((mEval‘𝑡) “ {⟨𝑚, ((mESyn‘𝑡)‘𝑒)⟩}) ∩ ((mUV‘𝑡) “ {(1st ‘𝑒)})))}
Definition	df-mitp 35593*	Define the interpretation function for a model. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mItp = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (mSA‘𝑡) ↦ (𝑔 ∈ X𝑖 ∈ ((mVars‘𝑡)‘𝑎)((mUV‘𝑡) “ {((mType‘𝑡)‘𝑖)}) ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑚 ∈ (mVL‘𝑡)(𝑔 = (𝑚 ↾ ((mVars‘𝑡)‘𝑎)) ∧ 𝑥 = (𝑚(mEval‘𝑡)𝑎))))))
Definition	df-mfitp 35594*	Define a function that produces the evaluation function, given the interpretation function for a model. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mFromItp = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∈ X𝑎 ∈ (mSA‘𝑡)(((mUV‘𝑡) “ {((1st ‘𝑡)‘𝑎)}) ↑m X𝑖 ∈ ((mVars‘𝑡)‘𝑎)((mUV‘𝑡) “ {((mType‘𝑡)‘𝑖)})) ↦ (℩𝑛 ∈ ((mUV‘𝑡) ↑pm ((mVL‘𝑡) × (mEx‘𝑡)))∀𝑚 ∈ (mVL‘𝑡)(∀𝑣 ∈ (mVR‘𝑡)⟨𝑚, ((mVH‘𝑡)‘𝑣)⟩𝑛(𝑚‘𝑣) ∧ ∀𝑒∀𝑎∀𝑔(𝑒(mST‘𝑡)⟨𝑎, 𝑔⟩ → ⟨𝑚, 𝑒⟩𝑛(𝑓‘(𝑖 ∈ ((mVars‘𝑡)‘𝑎) ↦ (𝑚𝑛(𝑔‘((mVH‘𝑡)‘𝑖)))))) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ (mEx‘𝑡)(𝑛 “ {⟨𝑚, 𝑒⟩}) = ((𝑛 “ {⟨𝑚, ((mESyn‘𝑡)‘𝑒)⟩}) ∩ ((mUV‘𝑡) “ {(1st ‘𝑒)}))))))
21.6.16  Splitting fields
Syntax	ccpms 35595	Completion of a metric space.
class cplMetSp
Syntax	chlb 35596	Embeddings for a direct limit.
class HomLimB
Syntax	chlim 35597	Direct limit structure.
class HomLim
Syntax	cpfl 35598	Polynomial extension field.
class polyFld
Syntax	csf1 35599	Splitting field for a single polynomial (auxiliary).
class splitFld1
Syntax	csf 35600	Splitting field for a finite set of polynomials.
class splitFld