Theorem bj-nfimexal 34501

Description: A weak from of nonfreeness in either an antecedent or a consequent implies that a universally quantified implication is equivalent to the associated implication where the antecedent is existentially quantified and the consequent is universally quantified. The forward implication always holds (this is 19.38 1846) and the converse implication is the join of instances of bj-alrimg 34494 and bj-exlimg 34498 (see 19.38a 1847 and 19.38b 1848). TODO: prove a version where the antecedents use the nonfreeness quantifier. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-nfimexal	⊢ (((∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∨ (∃𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) → ((∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))

Proof of Theorem bj-nfimexal

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		19.38 1846	. 2 ⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))
2		bj-alrimg 34494	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓)))
3		bj-exlimg 34498	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓)))
4	2, 3	jaoi 857	. 2 ⊢ (((∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∨ (∃𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓)))
5	1, 4	impbid2 229	1 ⊢ (((∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∨ (∃𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) → ((∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∨ wo 847  ∀wal 1541  ∃wex 1787

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-or 848  df-ex 1788

This theorem is referenced by: (None)