Theorem bj-nnfnt 35618

Description: A variable is nonfree in a formula if and only if it is nonfree in its negation. The foward implication is intuitionistically valid (and that direction is sufficient for the purpose of recursively proving that some formulas have a given variable not free in them, like bj-nnfim 35624). Intuitionistically, ⊢ (Ⅎ'𝑥¬ 𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ'𝑥¬ ¬ 𝜑). See nfnt 1860. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-nnfnt	⊢ (Ⅎ'𝑥𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ'𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem bj-nnfnt

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eximal 1785	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑))
2		alimex 1834	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜑))
3	1, 2	anbi12ci 629	. 2 ⊢ (((∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) ∧ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)) ↔ ((∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜑) ∧ (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)))
4		df-bj-nnf 35602	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ'𝑥𝜑 ↔ ((∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) ∧ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)))
5		df-bj-nnf 35602	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ'𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ((∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜑) ∧ (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)))
6	3, 4, 5	3bitr4i 303	1 ⊢ (Ⅎ'𝑥𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ'𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 397  ∀wal 1540  ∃wex 1782  Ⅎ'wnnf 35601

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-ex 1783  df-bj-nnf 35602

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-nnfnth  35621  bj-equsexvwd  35659