Theorem bj-nnfnt 34849

Description: A variable is nonfree in a formula if and only if it is nonfree in its negation. The foward implication is intuitionistically valid (and that direction is sufficient for the purpose of recursively proving that some formulas have a given variable not free in them, like bj-nnfim 34855). Intuitionistically, ⊢ (Ⅎ'𝑥¬ 𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ'𝑥¬ ¬ 𝜑). See nfnt 1860. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-nnfnt	⊢ (Ⅎ'𝑥𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ'𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem bj-nnfnt

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eximal 1786	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑))
2		alimex 1834	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜑))
3	1, 2	anbi12ci 627	. 2 ⊢ (((∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) ∧ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)) ↔ ((∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜑) ∧ (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)))
4		df-bj-nnf 34833	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ'𝑥𝜑 ↔ ((∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) ∧ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)))
5		df-bj-nnf 34833	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ'𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ((∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜑) ∧ (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)))
6	3, 4, 5	3bitr4i 302	1 ⊢ (Ⅎ'𝑥𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ'𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1537  ∃wex 1783  Ⅎ'wnnf 34832

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-ex 1784  df-bj-nnf 34833

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-nnfnth  34852  bj-equsexvwd  34890