Theorem bj-nnfnt 34922

Description: A variable is nonfree in a formula if and only if it is nonfree in its negation. The foward implication is intuitionistically valid (and that direction is sufficient for the purpose of recursively proving that some formulas have a given variable not free in them, like bj-nnfim 34928). Intuitionistically, ⊢ (Ⅎ'𝑥¬ 𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ'𝑥¬ ¬ 𝜑). See nfnt 1859. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-nnfnt	⊢ (Ⅎ'𝑥𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ'𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem bj-nnfnt

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eximal 1785	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑))
2		alimex 1833	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜑))
3	1, 2	anbi12ci 628	. 2 ⊢ (((∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) ∧ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)) ↔ ((∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜑) ∧ (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)))
4		df-bj-nnf 34906	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ'𝑥𝜑 ↔ ((∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) ∧ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)))
5		df-bj-nnf 34906	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ'𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ((∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜑) ∧ (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)))
6	3, 4, 5	3bitr4i 303	1 ⊢ (Ⅎ'𝑥𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ'𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396  ∀wal 1537  ∃wex 1782  Ⅎ'wnnf 34905

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-ex 1783  df-bj-nnf 34906

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-nnfnth  34925  bj-equsexvwd  34963