Theorem bj-nnfnt 34088

Description: A variable is nonfree in a formula if and only if it is nonfree in its negation. The foward implication is intuitionistically valid (and that direction is sufficient for the purpose of recursively proving that some formulas have a given variable not free in them, like bj-nnfim 34094). Intuitionistically, ⊢ (Ⅎ'𝑥¬ 𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ'𝑥¬ ¬ 𝜑). See nfnt 1855. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Jul-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-nnfnt	⊢ (Ⅎ'𝑥𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ'𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem bj-nnfnt

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eximal 1782	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑))
2		alimex 1830	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜑))
3	1, 2	anbi12ci 629	. 2 ⊢ (((∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) ∧ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)) ↔ ((∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜑) ∧ (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)))
4		df-bj-nnf 34075	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ'𝑥𝜑 ↔ ((∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) ∧ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)))
5		df-bj-nnf 34075	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ'𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ((∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜑) ∧ (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)))
6	3, 4, 5	3bitr4i 305	1 ⊢ (Ⅎ'𝑥𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ'𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398  ∀wal 1534  ∃wex 1779  Ⅎ'wnnf 34074

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-ex 1780  df-bj-nnf 34075

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-nnfnth  34091