| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > el3v3 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: If a proposition is implied by 𝑧 ∈ V (which is true, see vex 3446) and two other antecedents, then it is implied by these other antecedents. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Oct-2020.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| el3v3.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) → 𝜃) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| el3v3 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vex 3446 | . 2 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V | |
| 2 | el3v3.1 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ V) → 𝜃) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | mp3an3 1453 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 395 ∧ w3a 1087 ∈ wcel 2114 Vcvv 3442 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1912 ax-6 1969 ax-7 2010 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-ext 2709 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1545 df-ex 1782 df-sb 2069 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2812 df-v 3444 |
| This theorem is referenced by: el3v13 38484 el3v23 38485 dfgrlic2 48368 dfgrlic3 48370 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |