Theorem ineqcom 4164

Description: Two ways of expressing that two classes have a given intersection. This is often used when that given intersection is the empty set, in which case the statement displays two ways of expressing that two classes are disjoint (when 𝐶 = ∅: ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Mar-2017.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ineqcom	⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) = 𝐶)

Proof of Theorem ineqcom

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		incom 4163	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴)
2	1	eqeq1i 2769	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) = 𝐶)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 208   = wceq 1562   ∩ cin 3905

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1817  ax-4 1831  ax-5 1932  ax-6 1989  ax-7 2030  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2736

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-tru 1565  df-ex 1802  df-sb 2093  df-clab 2743  df-cleq 2756  df-rab 3417  df-in 3913

This theorem is referenced by:  sseqin2  4177  disjr  4407  uneqdifeq  4448  fnunres2  6636  padct  32922