Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ineqcom | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Two ways of expressing that two classes have a given intersection. This is often used when that given intersection is the empty set, in which case the statement displays two ways of expressing that two classes are disjoint (when 𝐶 = ∅: ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Mar-2017.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ineqcom | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) = 𝐶) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | incom 4131 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) | |
2 | 1 | eqeq1i 2743 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) = 𝐶) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ↔ wb 205 = wceq 1539 ∩ cin 3882 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1799 ax-4 1813 ax-5 1914 ax-6 1972 ax-7 2012 ax-9 2118 ax-ext 2709 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 396 df-tru 1542 df-ex 1784 df-sb 2069 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2730 df-rab 3072 df-in 3890 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |