Theorem ineqcom 4190

Description: Two ways of expressing that two classes have a given intersection. This is often used when that given intersection is the empty set, in which case the statement displays two ways of expressing that two classes are disjoint (when 𝐶 = ∅: ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Mar-2017.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ineqcom	⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) = 𝐶)

Proof of Theorem ineqcom

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		incom 4189	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴)
2	1	eqeq1i 2739	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) = 𝐶)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   = wceq 1539   ∩ cin 3930

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1794  ax-4 1808  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2006  ax-9 2117  ax-ext 2706

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1779  df-sb 2064  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2726  df-rab 3420  df-in 3938

This theorem is referenced by:  fnunres2  6661