| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ineqcom | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Two ways of expressing that two classes have a given intersection. This is often used when that given intersection is the empty set, in which case the statement displays two ways of expressing that two classes are disjoint (when 𝐶 = ∅: ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Mar-2017.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ineqcom | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) = 𝐶) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | incom 4156 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) | |
| 2 | 1 | eqeq1i 2736 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) = 𝐶) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ↔ wb 206 = wceq 1541 ∩ cin 3896 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1968 ax-7 2009 ax-9 2121 ax-ext 2703 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-tru 1544 df-ex 1781 df-sb 2068 df-clab 2710 df-cleq 2723 df-rab 3396 df-in 3904 |
| This theorem is referenced by: fnunres2 6594 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |