MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  nf3and Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem nf3and 1902
Description: Deduction form of bound-variable hypothesis builder nf3an 1905. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Oct-2016.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
nfand.1 (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
nfand.2 (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)
nfand.3 (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜃)
Assertion
Ref Expression
nf3and (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝜓𝜒𝜃))

Proof of Theorem nf3and
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-3an 1087 . 2 ((𝜓𝜒𝜃) ↔ ((𝜓𝜒) ∧ 𝜃))
2 nfand.1 . . . 4 (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
3 nfand.2 . . . 4 (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)
42, 3nfand 1901 . . 3 (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝜓𝜒))
5 nfand.3 . . 3 (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜃)
64, 5nfand 1901 . 2 (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥((𝜓𝜒) ∧ 𝜃))
71, 6nfxfrd 1857 1 (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝜓𝜒𝜃))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 395  w3a 1085  wnf 1787
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788
This theorem is referenced by:  nfttrcld  33696
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator