Theorem f1omvdmvd 18571

Description: A permutation of any class moves a point which is moved to a different point which is moved. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
f1omvdmvd	⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ∖ {𝑋}))

Proof of Theorem f1omvdmvd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpr 487	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ))
2		f1ofn 6616	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)
3		difss 4108	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ 𝐹
4		dmss 5771	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ 𝐹 → dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ dom 𝐹)
5	3, 4	ax-mp 5	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ dom 𝐹
6		f1odm 6619	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
7	5, 6	sseqtrid 4019	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 → dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ⊆ 𝐴)
8	7	sselda 3967	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)
9		fnelnfp 6939	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ 𝑋))
10	2, 8, 9	syl2an2r 683	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → (𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ 𝑋))
11	1, 10	mpbid 234	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ 𝑋)
12		f1of1 6614	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐴)
13	12	adantr 483	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐴)
14		f1of 6615	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐴)
15	14	adantr 483	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐴)
16	15, 8	ffvelrnd 6852	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐴)
17		f1fveq 7020	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐴 ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋))
18	13, 16, 8, 17	syl12anc 834	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → ((𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) = (𝐹‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑋))
19	18	necon3bid 3060	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → ((𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ 𝑋))
20	11, 19	mpbird 259	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑋))
21		fnelnfp 6939	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑋)))
22	2, 16, 21	syl2an2r 683	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ↔ (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) ≠ (𝐹‘𝑋)))
23	20, 22	mpbird 259	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ))
24		eldifsn 4719	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ∖ {𝑋}) ↔ ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ 𝑋))
25	23, 11, 24	sylanbrc 585	1 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∖ I )) → (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ (dom (𝐹 ∖ I ) ∖ {𝑋}))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114   ≠ wne 3016   ∖ cdif 3933   ⊆ wss 3936  {csn 4567   I cid 5459  dom cdm 5555   Fn wfn 6350  ⟶wf 6351  –1-1→wf1 6352  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6354  ‘cfv 6355

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2793  ax-sep 5203  ax-nul 5210  ax-pr 5330

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ne 3017  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-sbc 3773  df-dif 3939  df-un 3941  df-in 3943  df-ss 3952  df-nul 4292  df-if 4468  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-op 4574  df-uni 4839  df-br 5067  df-opab 5129  df-id 5460  df-xp 5561  df-rel 5562  df-cnv 5563  df-co 5564  df-dm 5565  df-rn 5566  df-res 5567  df-iota 6314  df-fun 6357  df-fn 6358  df-f 6359  df-f1 6360  df-f1o 6362  df-fv 6363

This theorem is referenced by:  f1otrspeq  18575  symggen  18598  pmtrcnel  30733  pmtrcnelor  30735