Theorem supiso 8941

Description: Image of a supremum under an isomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
supiso.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))
supiso.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴)
supisoex.3	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
supiso.4	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
supiso	⊢ (𝜑 → sup((𝐹 “ 𝐶), 𝐵, 𝑆) = (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐹,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem supiso

Dummy variables 𝑣 𝑢 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		supiso.4	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)
2		supiso.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))
3		isoso 7103	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Or 𝐵))
4	2, 3	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Or 𝐵))
5	1, 4	mpbid 234	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 Or 𝐵)
6		isof1o 7078	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
7		f1of 6617	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
8	2, 6, 7	3syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
9		supisoex.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
10	1, 9	supcl 8924	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ 𝐴)
11	8, 10	ffvelrnd 6854	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ∈ 𝐵)
12	1, 9	supub 8925	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 → ¬ sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑢))
13	12	ralrimiv 3183	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑢)
14	1, 9	suplub 8926	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑢𝑅sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑢𝑅𝑧))
15	14	expd 418	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑢𝑅sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑢𝑅𝑧)))
16	15	ralrimiv 3183	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢𝑅sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑢𝑅𝑧))
17		supiso.2	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴)
18	2, 17	supisolem 8939	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ 𝐴) → ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢𝑅sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑢𝑅𝑧)) ↔ (∀𝑤 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ¬ (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))𝑆𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑤𝑆(𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)𝑤𝑆𝑣))))
19	10, 18	mpdan 685	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢𝑅sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑢𝑅𝑧)) ↔ (∀𝑤 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ¬ (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))𝑆𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑤𝑆(𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)𝑤𝑆𝑣))))
20	13, 16, 19	mpbi2and 710	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑤 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ¬ (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))𝑆𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑤𝑆(𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)𝑤𝑆𝑣)))
21	20	simpld 497	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ¬ (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))𝑆𝑤)
22	21	r19.21bi 3210	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)) → ¬ (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))𝑆𝑤)
23	20	simprd 498	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑤𝑆(𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)𝑤𝑆𝑣))
24	23	r19.21bi 3210	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑤𝑆(𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)𝑤𝑆𝑣))
25	24	impr 457	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤𝑆(𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)))) → ∃𝑣 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)𝑤𝑆𝑣)
26	5, 11, 22, 25	eqsupd 8923	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup((𝐹 “ 𝐶), 𝐵, 𝑆) = (𝐹‘sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114  ∀wral 3140  ∃wrex 3141   ⊆ wss 3938   class class class wbr 5068   Or wor 5475   “ cima 5560  ⟶wf 6353  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6356  ‘cfv 6357   Isom wiso 6358  supcsup 8906

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2795  ax-sep 5205  ax-nul 5212  ax-pow 5268  ax-pr 5332

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3or 1084  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2802  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-nfc 2965  df-ne 3019  df-ral 3145  df-rex 3146  df-reu 3147  df-rmo 3148  df-rab 3149  df-v 3498  df-sbc 3775  df-dif 3941  df-un 3943  df-in 3945  df-ss 3954  df-nul 4294  df-if 4470  df-sn 4570  df-pr 4572  df-op 4576  df-uni 4841  df-br 5069  df-opab 5131  df-mpt 5149  df-id 5462  df-po 5476  df-so 5477  df-xp 5563  df-rel 5564  df-cnv 5565  df-co 5566  df-dm 5567  df-rn 5568  df-res 5569  df-ima 5570  df-iota 6316  df-fun 6359  df-fn 6360  df-f 6361  df-f1 6362  df-fo 6363  df-f1o 6364  df-fv 6365  df-isom 6366  df-riota 7116  df-sup 8908

This theorem is referenced by:  infiso  8974  infrenegsup  11626