Theorem dfsb7a 2013

Description: An alternate definition of proper substitution df-sb 1777. Similar to dfsb7 2010 in that it involves a dummy variable z, but expressed in terms of A. rather than E.. For a version which only requires F/ z ph rather than z and ph being distinct, see sb7af 2012. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfsb7a	|- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> A. z ( z = y -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, z   y, z   ph, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)

Proof of Theorem dfsb7a

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1542	. 2 |- F/ z ph
2	1	sb7af 2012	1 |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> A. z ( z = y -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 105   A.wal 1362   [wsb 1776

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777

This theorem is referenced by: (None)