Theorem sb7af 1966

Description: An alternate definition of proper substitution df-sb 1736. Similar to dfsb7a 1967 but does not require that ph and z be distinct. Similar to sb7f 1965 in that it involves a dummy variable z, but expressed in terms of A. rather than E.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2018.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
sb7af.1	|- F/ z ph

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb7af	|- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> A. z ( z = y -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, z   y, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y, z)

Proof of Theorem sb7af

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sb6 1858	. . 3 |- ( [ z / x ] ph <-> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) )
2	1	sbbii 1738	. 2 |- ( [ y / z ] [ z / x ] ph <-> [ y / z ] A. x ( x = z -> ph ) )
3		sb7af.1	. . 3 |- F/ z ph
4	3	sbco2 1936	. 2 |- ( [ y / z ] [ z / x ] ph <-> [ y / x ] ph )
5		sb6 1858	. 2 |- ( [ y / z ] A. x ( x = z -> ph ) <-> A. z ( z = y -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) )
6	2, 4, 5	3bitr3i 209	1 |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> A. z ( z = y -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 104   A.wal 1329   F/wnf 1436   [wsb 1735

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736

This theorem is referenced by:  dfsb7a  1967