Theorem elabgf1 15392

Description: One implication of elabgf 2906. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
elabgf1.nf1	|- F/_ x A
elabgf1.nf2	|- F/ x ps
elabgf1.1	|- ( x = A -> ( ph -> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elabgf1	|- ( A e. { x | ph } -> ps )

Proof of Theorem elabgf1

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elabgf1.nf1	. . 3 |- F/_ x A
2		elabgf1.nf2	. . 3 |- F/ x ps
3	1, 2	elabgft1 15391	. 2 |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph -> ps ) ) -> ( A e. { x | ph } -> ps ) )
4		elabgf1.1	. 2 |- ( x = A -> ( ph -> ps ) )
5	3, 4	mpg 1465	1 |- ( A e. { x | ph } -> ps )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   = wceq 1364   F/wnf 1474   e. wcel 2167   {cab 2182   F/_wnfc 2326

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-ext 2178

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-v 2765

This theorem is referenced by:  elabf1  15394