Theorem elabgf1 11022

Description: One implication of elabgf 2746. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
elabgf1.nf1	|- F/_ x A
elabgf1.nf2	|- F/ x ps
elabgf1.1	|- ( x = A -> ( ph -> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elabgf1	|- ( A e. { x | ph } -> ps )

Proof of Theorem elabgf1

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elabgf1.nf1	. . 3 |- F/_ x A
2		elabgf1.nf2	. . 3 |- F/ x ps
3	1, 2	elabgft1 11021	. 2 |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph -> ps ) ) -> ( A e. { x | ph } -> ps ) )
4		elabgf1.1	. 2 |- ( x = A -> ( ph -> ps ) )
5	3, 4	mpg 1381	1 |- ( A e. { x | ph } -> ps )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   = wceq 1285   F/wnf 1390   e. wcel 1434   {cab 2069   F/_wnfc 2210

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-10 1437  ax-11 1438  ax-i12 1439  ax-bndl 1440  ax-4 1441  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468  ax-i5r 1469  ax-ext 2065

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1288  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1688  df-clab 2070  df-cleq 2076  df-clel 2079  df-nfc 2212  df-v 2614

This theorem is referenced by:  elabf1  11024