Theorem elabgf 2868

Description: Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 6.13 of [Quine] p. 44. This version has bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
elabgf.1	|- F/_ x A
elabgf.2	|- F/ x ps
elabgf.3	|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elabgf	|- ( A e. B -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )

Proof of Theorem elabgf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elabgf.1	. 2 |- F/_ x A
2		nfab1 2310	. . . 4 |- F/_ x { x | ph }
3	1, 2	nfel 2317	. . 3 |- F/ x A e. { x | ph }
4		elabgf.2	. . 3 |- F/ x ps
5	3, 4	nfbi 1577	. 2 |- F/ x ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps )
6		eleq1 2229	. . 3 |- ( x = A -> ( x e. { x | ph } <-> A e. { x | ph } ) )
7		elabgf.3	. . 3 |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
8	6, 7	bibi12d 234	. 2 |- ( x = A -> ( ( x e. { x | ph } <-> ph ) <-> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) ) )
9		abid 2153	. 2 |- ( x e. { x | ph } <-> ph )
10	1, 5, 8, 9	vtoclgf 2784	1 |- ( A e. B -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 104   = wceq 1343   F/wnf 1448   e. wcel 2136   {cab 2151   F/_wnfc 2295

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-10 1493  ax-11 1494  ax-i12 1495  ax-bndl 1497  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-i5r 1523  ax-ext 2147

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1346  df-nf 1449  df-sb 1751  df-clab 2152  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161  df-nfc 2297  df-v 2728

This theorem is referenced by:  elabf  2869  elabg  2872  elab3gf  2876  elrabf  2880  bj-intabssel  13670