Theorem elabgf 2830

Description: Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 6.13 of [Quine] p. 44. This version has bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
elabgf.1	|- F/_ x A
elabgf.2	|- F/ x ps
elabgf.3	|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elabgf	|- ( A e. B -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )

Proof of Theorem elabgf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elabgf.1	. 2 |- F/_ x A
2		nfab1 2284	. . . 4 |- F/_ x { x | ph }
3	1, 2	nfel 2291	. . 3 |- F/ x A e. { x | ph }
4		elabgf.2	. . 3 |- F/ x ps
5	3, 4	nfbi 1569	. 2 |- F/ x ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps )
6		eleq1 2203	. . 3 |- ( x = A -> ( x e. { x | ph } <-> A e. { x | ph } ) )
7		elabgf.3	. . 3 |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
8	6, 7	bibi12d 234	. 2 |- ( x = A -> ( ( x e. { x | ph } <-> ph ) <-> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) ) )
9		abid 2128	. 2 |- ( x e. { x | ph } <-> ph )
10	1, 5, 8, 9	vtoclgf 2747	1 |- ( A e. B -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 104   = wceq 1332   F/wnf 1437   e. wcel 1481   {cab 2126   F/_wnfc 2269

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1424  ax-7 1425  ax-gen 1426  ax-ie1 1470  ax-ie2 1471  ax-8 1483  ax-10 1484  ax-11 1485  ax-i12 1486  ax-bndl 1487  ax-4 1488  ax-17 1507  ax-i9 1511  ax-ial 1515  ax-i5r 1516  ax-ext 2122

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1335  df-nf 1438  df-sb 1737  df-clab 2127  df-cleq 2133  df-clel 2136  df-nfc 2271  df-v 2691

This theorem is referenced by:  elabf  2831  elabg  2834  elab3gf  2838  elrabf  2842  bj-intabssel  13167