Theorem elabgf2 12976

Description: One implication of elabgf 2821. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
elabgf2.nf1	|- F/_ x A
elabgf2.nf2	|- F/ x ps
elabgf2.1	|- ( x = A -> ( ps -> ph ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elabgf2	|- ( A e. B -> ( ps -> A e. { x | ph } ) )

Proof of Theorem elabgf2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elabgf2.nf1	. 2 |- F/_ x A
2		elabgf2.nf2	. . 3 |- F/ x ps
3		nfab1 2281	. . . 4 |- F/_ x { x | ph }
4	1, 3	nfel 2288	. . 3 |- F/ x A e. { x | ph }
5	2, 4	nfim 1551	. 2 |- F/ x ( ps -> A e. { x | ph } )
6		elabgf0 12973	. 2 |- ( x = A -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ph ) )
7		bicom1 130	. . 3 |- ( ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ph ) -> ( ph <-> A e. { x | ph } ) )
8		elabgf2.1	. . . 4 |- ( x = A -> ( ps -> ph ) )
9		bi1 117	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph <-> A e. { x | ph } ) -> ( ph -> A e. { x | ph } ) )
10	8, 9	syl9 72	. . 3 |- ( x = A -> ( ( ph <-> A e. { x | ph } ) -> ( ps -> A e. { x | ph } ) ) )
11	7, 10	syl5 32	. 2 |- ( x = A -> ( ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ph ) -> ( ps -> A e. { x | ph } ) ) )
12	1, 5, 6, 11	bj-vtoclgf 12972	1 |- ( A e. B -> ( ps -> A e. { x | ph } ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 104   = wceq 1331   F/wnf 1436   e. wcel 1480   {cab 2123   F/_wnfc 2266

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-clab 2124  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-nfc 2268  df-v 2683

This theorem is referenced by:  elabf2  12978  elabg2  12981  bj-intabssel1  12986