Theorem injust 3158

Description: Soundness justification theorem for df-in 3159. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
injust	|- { x | ( x e. A /\ x e. B ) } = { y | ( y e. A /\ y e. B ) }

Distinct variable groups:   x, A   x, B   y, A   y, B

Proof of Theorem injust

Dummy variable z is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq1 2256	. . . 4 |- ( x = z -> ( x e. A <-> z e. A ) )
2		eleq1 2256	. . . 4 |- ( x = z -> ( x e. B <-> z e. B ) )
3	1, 2	anbi12d 473	. . 3 |- ( x = z -> ( ( x e. A /\ x e. B ) <-> ( z e. A /\ z e. B ) ) )
4	3	cbvabv 2318	. 2 |- { x | ( x e. A /\ x e. B ) } = { z | ( z e. A /\ z e. B ) }
5		eleq1 2256	. . . 4 |- ( z = y -> ( z e. A <-> y e. A ) )
6		eleq1 2256	. . . 4 |- ( z = y -> ( z e. B <-> y e. B ) )
7	5, 6	anbi12d 473	. . 3 |- ( z = y -> ( ( z e. A /\ z e. B ) <-> ( y e. A /\ y e. B ) ) )
8	7	cbvabv 2318	. 2 |- { z | ( z e. A /\ z e. B ) } = { y | ( y e. A /\ y e. B ) }
9	4, 8	eqtri 2214	1 |- { x | ( x e. A /\ x e. B ) } = { y | ( y e. A /\ y e. B ) }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1364   e. wcel 2164   {cab 2179

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-ext 2175

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189

This theorem is referenced by: (None)