Theorem injust 3121

Description: Soundness justification theorem for df-in 3122. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
injust	⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝐵

Proof of Theorem injust

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq1 2229	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
2		eleq1 2229	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
3	1, 2	anbi12d 465	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)))
4	3	cbvabv 2291	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)}
5		eleq1 2229	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
6		eleq1 2229	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
7	5, 6	anbi12d 465	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
8	7	cbvabv 2291	. 2 ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
9	4, 8	eqtri 2186	1 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 103   = wceq 1343   ∈ wcel 2136  {cab 2151

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-10 1493  ax-11 1494  ax-i12 1495  ax-bndl 1497  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-i5r 1523  ax-ext 2147

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1449  df-sb 1751  df-clab 2152  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161

This theorem is referenced by: (None)