Theorem injust 3162

Description: Soundness justification theorem for df-in 3163. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
injust	⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝐵

Proof of Theorem injust

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq1 2259	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
2		eleq1 2259	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
3	1, 2	anbi12d 473	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)))
4	3	cbvabv 2321	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)}
5		eleq1 2259	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
6		eleq1 2259	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
7	5, 6	anbi12d 473	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
8	7	cbvabv 2321	. 2 ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
9	4, 8	eqtri 2217	1 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1364   ∈ wcel 2167  {cab 2182

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-ext 2178

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192

This theorem is referenced by: (None)