ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  injust GIF version

Theorem injust 3044
Description: Soundness justification theorem for df-in 3045. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
injust {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝐴𝑦𝐵)}
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝐵

Proof of Theorem injust
Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 eleq1 2178 . . . 4 (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥𝐴𝑧𝐴))
2 eleq1 2178 . . . 4 (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥𝐵𝑧𝐵))
31, 2anbi12d 462 . . 3 (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵) ↔ (𝑧𝐴𝑧𝐵)))
43cbvabv 2239 . 2 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧𝐴𝑧𝐵)}
5 eleq1 2178 . . . 4 (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧𝐴𝑦𝐴))
6 eleq1 2178 . . . 4 (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧𝐵𝑦𝐵))
75, 6anbi12d 462 . . 3 (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ((𝑧𝐴𝑧𝐵) ↔ (𝑦𝐴𝑦𝐵)))
87cbvabv 2239 . 2 {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧𝐴𝑧𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝐴𝑦𝐵)}
94, 8eqtri 2136 1 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝐴𝑦𝐵)}
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wa 103   = wceq 1314  wcel 1463  {cab 2101
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 681  ax-5 1406  ax-7 1407  ax-gen 1408  ax-ie1 1452  ax-ie2 1453  ax-8 1465  ax-10 1466  ax-11 1467  ax-i12 1468  ax-bndl 1469  ax-4 1470  ax-17 1489  ax-i9 1493  ax-ial 1497  ax-i5r 1498  ax-ext 2097
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1420  df-sb 1719  df-clab 2102  df-cleq 2108  df-clel 2111
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator