Theorem nfifd 3588

Description: Deduction version of nfif 3589. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfifd.2	|- ( ph -> F/ x ps )
nfifd.3	|- ( ph -> F/_ x A )
nfifd.4	|- ( ph -> F/_ x B )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfifd	|- ( ph -> F/_ x if ( ps , A , B ) )

Proof of Theorem nfifd

Dummy variable y is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-if 3562	. 2 |- if ( ps , A , B ) = { y | ( ( y e. A /\ ps ) \/ ( y e. B /\ -. ps ) ) }
2		nfv 1542	. . 3 |- F/ y ph
3		nfifd.3	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> F/_ x A )
4	3	nfcrd 2353	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> F/ x y e. A )
5		nfifd.2	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> F/ x ps )
6	4, 5	nfand 1582	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> F/ x ( y e. A /\ ps ) )
7		nfifd.4	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> F/_ x B )
8	7	nfcrd 2353	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> F/ x y e. B )
9	5	nfnd 1671	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> F/ x -. ps )
10	8, 9	nfand 1582	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> F/ x ( y e. B /\ -. ps ) )
11	6, 10	nford 1581	. . 3 |- ( ph -> F/ x ( ( y e. A /\ ps ) \/ ( y e. B /\ -. ps ) ) )
12	2, 11	nfabd 2359	. 2 |- ( ph -> F/_ x { y | ( ( y e. A /\ ps ) \/ ( y e. B /\ -. ps ) ) } )
13	1, 12	nfcxfrd 2337	1 |- ( ph -> F/_ x if ( ps , A , B ) )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   \/ wo 709   F/wnf 1474   e. wcel 2167   {cab 2182   F/_wnfc 2326   ifcif 3561

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-ext 2178

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1367  df-fal 1370  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-if 3562

This theorem is referenced by:  nfif  3589