Theorem nfifd 3465

Description: Deduction version of nfif 3466. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfifd.2	|- ( ph -> F/ x ps )
nfifd.3	|- ( ph -> F/_ x A )
nfifd.4	|- ( ph -> F/_ x B )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfifd	|- ( ph -> F/_ x if ( ps , A , B ) )

Proof of Theorem nfifd

Dummy variable y is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-if 3441	. 2 |- if ( ps , A , B ) = { y | ( ( y e. A /\ ps ) \/ ( y e. B /\ -. ps ) ) }
2		nfv 1491	. . 3 |- F/ y ph
3		nfifd.3	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> F/_ x A )
4	3	nfcrd 2269	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> F/ x y e. A )
5		nfifd.2	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> F/ x ps )
6	4, 5	nfand 1530	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> F/ x ( y e. A /\ ps ) )
7		nfifd.4	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> F/_ x B )
8	7	nfcrd 2269	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> F/ x y e. B )
9	5	nfnd 1618	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> F/ x -. ps )
10	8, 9	nfand 1530	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> F/ x ( y e. B /\ -. ps ) )
11	6, 10	nford 1529	. . 3 |- ( ph -> F/ x ( ( y e. A /\ ps ) \/ ( y e. B /\ -. ps ) ) )
12	2, 11	nfabd 2274	. 2 |- ( ph -> F/_ x { y | ( ( y e. A /\ ps ) \/ ( y e. B /\ -. ps ) ) } )
13	1, 12	nfcxfrd 2253	1 |- ( ph -> F/_ x if ( ps , A , B ) )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103   \/ wo 680   F/wnf 1419   e. wcel 1463   {cab 2101   F/_wnfc 2242   ifcif 3440

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 586  ax-in2 587  ax-io 681  ax-5 1406  ax-7 1407  ax-gen 1408  ax-ie1 1452  ax-ie2 1453  ax-8 1465  ax-10 1466  ax-11 1467  ax-i12 1468  ax-bndl 1469  ax-4 1470  ax-17 1489  ax-i9 1493  ax-ial 1497  ax-i5r 1498  ax-ext 2097

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1317  df-fal 1320  df-nf 1420  df-sb 1719  df-clab 2102  df-cleq 2108  df-clel 2111  df-nfc 2244  df-if 3441

This theorem is referenced by:  nfif  3466