Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > 3adantr3 | GIF version |
Description: Deduction adding a conjunct to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2005.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
3adantr.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
3adantr3 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏)) → 𝜃) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 3simpa 984 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) | |
2 | 3adantr.1 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) | |
3 | 1, 2 | sylan2 284 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏)) → 𝜃) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ∧ w3a 968 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-3an 970 |
This theorem is referenced by: 3ad2antr1 1152 3ad2antr2 1153 3adant3r3 1204 isosolem 5792 caovlem2d 6034 tanaddap 11680 isxmet2d 12988 xmetres2 13019 comet 13139 xmetxp 13147 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |