Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > con2bidc | GIF version |
Description: Contraposition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Apr-2018.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
con2bidc | ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝜑)))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | con1bidc 860 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → ((¬ 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜓 ↔ 𝜑)))) | |
2 | 1 | imp 123 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((DECID 𝜑 ∧ DECID 𝜓) → ((¬ 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))) |
3 | bicom 139 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝜑)) | |
4 | bicom 139 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((¬ 𝜓 ↔ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)) | |
5 | 2, 3, 4 | 3bitr3g 221 | . . 3 ⊢ ((DECID 𝜑 ∧ DECID 𝜓) → ((𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓))) |
6 | 5 | bicomd 140 | . 2 ⊢ ((DECID 𝜑 ∧ DECID 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝜑))) |
7 | 6 | ex 114 | 1 ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝜑)))) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ↔ wb 104 DECID wdc 820 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-in1 604 ax-in2 605 ax-io 699 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-stab 817 df-dc 821 |
This theorem is referenced by: annimdc 922 pm4.55dc 923 orandc 924 nbbndc 1376 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |