Theorem imordc 830

Description: Implication in terms of disjunction for a decidable proposition. Based on theorem *4.6 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120. The reverse direction, imorr 831, holds for all propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Apr-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
imordc	⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))

Proof of Theorem imordc

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		notnotbdc 800	. . 3 ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (𝜑 ↔ ¬ ¬ 𝜑))
2	1	imbi1d 229	. 2 ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)))
3		dcn 780	. . 3 ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → DECID ¬ 𝜑)
4		dfordc 825	. . 3 ⊢ (DECID ¬ 𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)))
5	3, 4	syl 14	. 2 ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)))
6	2, 5	bitr4d 189	1 ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 103   ∨ wo 662  DECID wdc 776

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in1 577  ax-in2 578  ax-io 663

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-dc 777

This theorem is referenced by:  pm4.62dc  832  pm2.26dc  847  nf4dc  1601  algcvgblem  10809  divgcdodd  10900