Theorem dfordc 894

Description: Definition of disjunction in terms of negation and implication for a decidable proposition. Based on definition of [Margaris] p. 49. One direction, pm2.53 724, holds for all propositions, not just decidable ones. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Mar-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfordc	⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)))

Proof of Theorem dfordc

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pm2.53 724	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))
2		pm2.54dc 893	. 2 ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
3	1, 2	impbid2 143	1 ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 105   ∨ wo 710  DECID wdc 836

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 837

This theorem is referenced by:  imordc  899  pm4.64dc  902  pm5.17dc  906  pm5.6dc  928  pm3.12dc  961  pm5.15dc  1409  19.32dc  1703  r19.30dc  2654  r19.32vdc  2656  prime  9492  isprm4  12516  prm2orodd  12523  euclemma  12543  phiprmpw  12619