Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > orim1d | GIF version |
Description: Disjoin antecedents and consequents in a deduction. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1995.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
orim1d.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
orim1d | ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | orim1d.1 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) | |
2 | idd 21 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜃)) | |
3 | 1, 2 | orim12d 781 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃))) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∨ wo 703 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 704 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 |
This theorem is referenced by: pm2.38 798 pm2.73 801 pm2.74 802 pm2.8 805 pm2.82 807 unss1 3296 acexmidlemcase 5848 exmidomniim 7117 nn0ge2m1nn 9195 exmidsbthrlem 14054 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |