P. 8 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 701-800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	nbn 701	The negation of a wff is equivalent to the wff's equivalence to falsehood. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ¬ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜓 ↔ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	nbn3 702	Transfer falsehood via equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 11-Sep-2006.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜓 ↔ (𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	2false 703	Two falsehoods are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ¬ 𝜑    &   ⊢ ¬ 𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	2falsed 704	Two falsehoods are equivalent (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	pm5.21ni 705	Two propositions implying a false one are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-May-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜓 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	pm5.21nii 706	Eliminate an antecedent implied by each side of a biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
Theorem	pm5.21ndd 707	Eliminate an antecedent implied by each side of a biconditional, deduction version. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Nov-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
Theorem	pm5.19 708	Theorem *5.19 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 124. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ¬ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	pm4.8 709	Theorem *4.8 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 122. This one holds for all propositions, but compare with pm4.81dc 910 which requires a decidability condition. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ 𝜑)
1.2.6  Logical disjunction
Syntax	wo 710	Extend wff definition to include disjunction ('or').
wff (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)
Axiom	ax-io 711	Definition of 'or'. One of the axioms of propositional logic. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.) Use its alias jaob 712 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) → 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	jaob 712	Disjunction of antecedents. Compare Theorem *4.77 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 121. Alias of ax-io 711. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) → 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	olc 713	Introduction of a disjunct. Axiom *1.3 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 96. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.) (Revised by NM, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜑))
Theorem	orc 714	Introduction of a disjunct. Theorem *2.2 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.) (Revised by NM, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm2.67-2 715	Slight generalization of Theorem *2.67 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Revised by NM, 9-Dec-2012.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	oibabs 716	Absorption of disjunction into equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1995.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm3.44 717	Theorem *3.44 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∧ (𝜒 → 𝜑)) → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) → 𝜑))
Theorem	jaoi 718	Inference disjoining the antecedents of two implications. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-1994.) (Revised by NM, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) → 𝜓)
Theorem	jaod 719	Deduction disjoining the antecedents of two implications. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1994.) (Revised by NM, 4-Apr-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) → 𝜒))
Theorem	mpjaod 720	Eliminate a disjunction in a deduction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	jaao 721	Inference conjoining and disjoining the antecedents of two implications. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-1999.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜏) → 𝜒))
Theorem	jaoa 722	Inference disjoining and conjoining the antecedents of two implications. (Contributed by Stefan Allan, 1-Nov-2008.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜃) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜒))
Theorem	imorr 723	Implication in terms of disjunction. One direction of theorem *4.6 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120. The converse holds for decidable propositions, as seen at imordc 899. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jul-2018.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	pm2.53 724	Theorem *2.53 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107. This holds intuitionistically, although its converse does not (see pm2.54dc 893). (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Revised by NM, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	ori 725	Infer implication from disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	ord 726	Deduce implication from disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	orel1 727	Elimination of disjunction by denial of a disjunct. Theorem *2.55 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-Jul-2012.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	orel2 728	Elimination of disjunction by denial of a disjunct. Theorem *2.56 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Apr-2013.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜑) → 𝜓))
Theorem	pm1.4 729	Axiom *1.4 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 96. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Revised by NM, 15-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜑))
Theorem	orcom 730	Commutative law for disjunction. Theorem *4.31 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 118. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 15-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜑))
Theorem	orcomd 731	Commutation of disjuncts in consequent. (Contributed by NM, 2-Dec-2010.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	orcoms 732	Commutation of disjuncts in antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 2-Dec-2012.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜑) → 𝜒)
Theorem	orci 733	Deduction introducing a disjunct. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jan-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)
Theorem	olci 734	Deduction introducing a disjunct. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jan-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜑)
Theorem	orcd 735	Deduction introducing a disjunct. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2007.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
Theorem	olcd 736	Deduction introducing a disjunct. (Contributed by NM, 11-Apr-2008.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	orcs 737	Deduction eliminating disjunct. Notational convention: We sometimes suffix with "s" the label of an inference that manipulates an antecedent, leaving the consequent unchanged. The "s" means that the inference eliminates the need for a syllogism (syl 14) -type inference in a proof. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	olcs 738	Deduction eliminating disjunct. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒)
Theorem	pm2.07 739	Theorem *2.07 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 101. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜑))
Theorem	pm2.45 740	Theorem *2.45 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	pm2.46 741	Theorem *2.46 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → ¬ 𝜓)
Theorem	pm2.47 742	Theorem *2.47 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm2.48 743	Theorem *2.48 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm2.49 744	Theorem *2.49 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm2.67 745	Theorem *2.67 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Revised by NM, 9-Dec-2012.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	biorf 746	A wff is equivalent to its disjunction with falsehood. Theorem *4.74 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 121. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
Theorem	biortn 747	A wff is equivalent to its negated disjunction with falsehood. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jul-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
Theorem	biorfi 748	A wff is equivalent to its disjunction with falsehood. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-1995.)
⊢ ¬ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜑))
Theorem	pm2.621 749	Theorem *2.621 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Revised by NM, 13-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	pm2.62 750	Theorem *2.62 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 13-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	imorri 751	Infer implication from disjunction. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	pm4.52im 752	One direction of theorem *4.52 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120. The converse also holds in classical logic. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2018.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → ¬ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm4.53r 753	One direction of theorem *4.53 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120. The converse also holds in classical logic. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2018.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	ioran 754	Negated disjunction in terms of conjunction. This version of DeMorgan's law is a biconditional for all propositions (not just decidable ones), unlike oranim 783, anordc 959, or ianordc 901. Compare Theorem *4.56 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm3.14 755	Theorem *3.14 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 111. One direction of De Morgan's law). The biconditional holds for decidable propositions as seen at ianordc 901. The converse holds for decidable propositions, as seen at pm3.13dc 962. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) → ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm3.1 756	Theorem *3.1 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 111. The converse holds for decidable propositions, as seen at anordc 959. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ¬ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	jao 757	Disjunction of antecedents. Compare Theorem *3.44 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Apr-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) → 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm1.2 758	Axiom *1.2 (Taut) of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 96. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Revised by NM, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜑) → 𝜑)
Theorem	oridm 759	Idempotent law for disjunction. Theorem *4.25 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 117. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 16-Apr-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	pm4.25 760	Theorem *4.25 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 117. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜑))
Theorem	orim12i 761	Disjoin antecedents and consequents of two premises. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Jul-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃))
Theorem	orim1i 762	Introduce disjunct to both sides of an implication. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
Theorem	orim2i 763	Introduce disjunct to both sides of an implication. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	orbi2i 764	Inference adding a left disjunct to both sides of a logical equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Dec-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	orbi1i 765	Inference adding a right disjunct to both sides of a logical equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
Theorem	orbi12i 766	Infer the disjunction of two equivalences. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃))
Theorem	pm1.5 767	Axiom *1.5 (Assoc) of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 96. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) → (𝜓 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	or12 768	Swap two disjuncts. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	orass 769	Associative law for disjunction. Theorem *4.33 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 118. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm2.31 770	Theorem *2.31 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒))
Theorem	pm2.32 771	Theorem *2.32 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 105. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	or32 772	A rearrangement of disjuncts. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	or4 773	Rearrangement of 4 disjuncts. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∨ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)))
Theorem	or42 774	Rearrangement of 4 disjuncts. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∨ (𝜃 ∨ 𝜓)))
Theorem	orordi 775	Distribution of disjunction over disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-1995.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	orordir 776	Distribution of disjunction over disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-1995.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∨ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm2.3 777	Theorem *2.3 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) → (𝜑 ∨ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm2.41 778	Theorem *2.41 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm2.42 779	Theorem *2.42 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	pm2.4 780	Theorem *2.4 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 106. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm4.44 781	Theorem *4.44 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 119. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜑 ∨ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm4.56 782	Theorem *4.56 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	oranim 783	Disjunction in terms of conjunction (DeMorgan's law). One direction of Theorem *4.57 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120. The converse does not hold intuitionistically but does hold in classical logic. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jul-2018.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → ¬ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm4.78i 784	Implication distributes over disjunction. One direction of Theorem *4.78 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 121. The converse holds in classical logic. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	mtord 785	A modus tollens deduction involving disjunction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Jul-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)
Theorem	pm4.45 786	Theorem *4.45 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 119. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm3.48 787	Theorem *3.48 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 114. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-1997.) (Revised by NM, 1-Dec-2012.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 → 𝜃)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)))
Theorem	orim12d 788	Disjoin antecedents and consequents in a deduction. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜏)))
Theorem	orim1d 789	Disjoin antecedents and consequents in a deduction. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)))
Theorem	orim2d 790	Disjoin antecedents and consequents in a deduction. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜃 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	orim2 791	Axiom *1.6 (Sum) of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	orbi2d 792	Deduction adding a left disjunct to both sides of a logical equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜃 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	orbi1d 793	Deduction adding a right disjunct to both sides of a logical equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)))
Theorem	orbi1 794	Theorem *4.37 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 118. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	orbi12d 795	Deduction joining two equivalences to form equivalence of disjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜏)))
Theorem	pm5.61 796	Theorem *5.61 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	jaoian 797	Inference disjoining the antecedents of two implications. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	jao1i 798	Add a disjunct in the antecedent of an implication. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 24-Sep-2010.)
⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜒 → 𝜑))
Theorem	jaodan 799	Deduction disjoining the antecedents of two implications. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)) → 𝜒)
Theorem	mpjaodan 800	Eliminate a disjunction in a deduction. A translation of natural deduction rule ∨ E (∨ elimination). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)