ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  exmidomniim GIF version

Theorem exmidomniim 7021
Description: Given excluded middle, every set is omniscient. Remark following Definition 3.1 of [Pierik], p. 14. This is one direction of the biconditional exmidomni 7022. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jun-2022.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
exmidomniim (EXMID → ∀𝑥 𝑥 ∈ Omni)

Proof of Theorem exmidomniim
Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 exmidexmid 4128 . . . . . . . . 9 (EXMIDDECID𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = 1o)
2 exmiddc 822 . . . . . . . . 9 (DECID𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = 1o → (∀𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = 1o ∨ ¬ ∀𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = 1o))
31, 2syl 14 . . . . . . . 8 (EXMID → (∀𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = 1o ∨ ¬ ∀𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = 1o))
43orcomd 719 . . . . . . 7 (EXMID → (¬ ∀𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = 1o ∨ ∀𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = 1o))
54adantr 274 . . . . . 6 ((EXMID𝑓:𝑥⟶2o) → (¬ ∀𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = 1o ∨ ∀𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = 1o))
6 ffvelrn 5561 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ((𝑓:𝑥⟶2o𝑦𝑥) → (𝑓𝑦) ∈ 2o)
7 df2o3 6335 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2o = {∅, 1o}
86, 7eleqtrdi 2233 . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ((𝑓:𝑥⟶2o𝑦𝑥) → (𝑓𝑦) ∈ {∅, 1o})
9 elpri 3555 . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ((𝑓𝑦) ∈ {∅, 1o} → ((𝑓𝑦) = ∅ ∨ (𝑓𝑦) = 1o))
108, 9syl 14 . . . . . . . . . . . 12 ((𝑓:𝑥⟶2o𝑦𝑥) → ((𝑓𝑦) = ∅ ∨ (𝑓𝑦) = 1o))
1110ord 714 . . . . . . . . . . 11 ((𝑓:𝑥⟶2o𝑦𝑥) → (¬ (𝑓𝑦) = ∅ → (𝑓𝑦) = 1o))
1211ralimdva 2502 . . . . . . . . . 10 (𝑓:𝑥⟶2o → (∀𝑦𝑥 ¬ (𝑓𝑦) = ∅ → ∀𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = 1o))
1312con3d 621 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝑓:𝑥⟶2o → (¬ ∀𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = 1o → ¬ ∀𝑦𝑥 ¬ (𝑓𝑦) = ∅))
1413adantl 275 . . . . . . . 8 ((EXMID𝑓:𝑥⟶2o) → (¬ ∀𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = 1o → ¬ ∀𝑦𝑥 ¬ (𝑓𝑦) = ∅))
15 exmidexmid 4128 . . . . . . . . . 10 (EXMIDDECID𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = ∅)
16 dfrex2dc 2429 . . . . . . . . . 10 (DECID𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = ∅ → (∃𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦𝑥 ¬ (𝑓𝑦) = ∅))
1715, 16syl 14 . . . . . . . . 9 (EXMID → (∃𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦𝑥 ¬ (𝑓𝑦) = ∅))
1817adantr 274 . . . . . . . 8 ((EXMID𝑓:𝑥⟶2o) → (∃𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦𝑥 ¬ (𝑓𝑦) = ∅))
1914, 18sylibrd 168 . . . . . . 7 ((EXMID𝑓:𝑥⟶2o) → (¬ ∀𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = 1o → ∃𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = ∅))
2019orim1d 777 . . . . . 6 ((EXMID𝑓:𝑥⟶2o) → ((¬ ∀𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = 1o ∨ ∀𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = 1o) → (∃𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = ∅ ∨ ∀𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = 1o)))
215, 20mpd 13 . . . . 5 ((EXMID𝑓:𝑥⟶2o) → (∃𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = ∅ ∨ ∀𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = 1o))
2221ex 114 . . . 4 (EXMID → (𝑓:𝑥⟶2o → (∃𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = ∅ ∨ ∀𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = 1o)))
2322alrimiv 1847 . . 3 (EXMID → ∀𝑓(𝑓:𝑥⟶2o → (∃𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = ∅ ∨ ∀𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = 1o)))
24 isomni 7016 . . . 4 (𝑥 ∈ V → (𝑥 ∈ Omni ↔ ∀𝑓(𝑓:𝑥⟶2o → (∃𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = ∅ ∨ ∀𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = 1o))))
2524elv 2693 . . 3 (𝑥 ∈ Omni ↔ ∀𝑓(𝑓:𝑥⟶2o → (∃𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = ∅ ∨ ∀𝑦𝑥 (𝑓𝑦) = 1o)))
2623, 25sylibr 133 . 2 (EXMID𝑥 ∈ Omni)
2726alrimiv 1847 1 (EXMID → ∀𝑥 𝑥 ∈ Omni)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wi 4  wa 103  wb 104  wo 698  DECID wdc 820  wal 1330   = wceq 1332  wcel 1481  wral 2417  wrex 2418  Vcvv 2689  c0 3368  {cpr 3533  EXMIDwem 4126  wf 5127  cfv 5131  1oc1o 6314  2oc2o 6315  Omnicomni 7012
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 604  ax-in2 605  ax-io 699  ax-5 1424  ax-7 1425  ax-gen 1426  ax-ie1 1470  ax-ie2 1471  ax-8 1483  ax-10 1484  ax-11 1485  ax-i12 1486  ax-bndl 1487  ax-4 1488  ax-14 1493  ax-17 1507  ax-i9 1511  ax-ial 1515  ax-i5r 1516  ax-ext 2122  ax-sep 4054  ax-nul 4062  ax-pow 4106  ax-pr 4139
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-dc 821  df-3an 965  df-tru 1335  df-fal 1338  df-nf 1438  df-sb 1737  df-eu 2003  df-mo 2004  df-clab 2127  df-cleq 2133  df-clel 2136  df-nfc 2271  df-ral 2422  df-rex 2423  df-rab 2426  df-v 2691  df-sbc 2914  df-dif 3078  df-un 3080  df-in 3082  df-ss 3089  df-nul 3369  df-pw 3517  df-sn 3538  df-pr 3539  df-op 3541  df-uni 3745  df-br 3938  df-opab 3998  df-exmid 4127  df-id 4223  df-suc 4301  df-xp 4553  df-rel 4554  df-cnv 4555  df-co 4556  df-dm 4557  df-rn 4558  df-iota 5096  df-fun 5133  df-fn 5134  df-f 5135  df-fv 5139  df-1o 6321  df-2o 6322  df-omni 7014
This theorem is referenced by:  exmidomni  7022
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator