Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rexbida | GIF version |
Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2003.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ralbida.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 |
ralbida.2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rexbida | ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ralbida.1 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 | |
2 | ralbida.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
3 | 2 | pm5.32da 448 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
4 | 1, 3 | exbid 1604 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
5 | df-rex 2450 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) | |
6 | df-rex 2450 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)) | |
7 | 4, 5, 6 | 3bitr4g 222 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ↔ wb 104 Ⅎwnf 1448 ∃wex 1480 ∈ wcel 2136 ∃wrex 2445 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-5 1435 ax-gen 1437 ax-ie1 1481 ax-ie2 1482 ax-4 1498 ax-ial 1522 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-nf 1449 df-rex 2450 |
This theorem is referenced by: rexbidva 2463 rexbid 2465 rexbi 2599 dfiun2g 3898 fun11iun 5453 ismkvnex 7119 mkvprop 7122 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |