Theorem sb4e 1777

Description: One direction of a simplified definition of substitution that unlike sb4 1804 doesn't require a distinctor antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb4e	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑦𝜑))

Proof of Theorem sb4e

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sb1 1739	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
2		equs5e 1767	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑦𝜑))
3	1, 2	syl 14	1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑦𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103  ∀wal 1329  ∃wex 1468  [wsb 1735

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-5 1423  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-11 1484  ax-4 1487  ax-ial 1514

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-sb 1736

This theorem is referenced by:  hbsb2e  1779