Theorem sb4e 1733

Description: One direction of a simplified definition of substitution that unlike sb4 1760 doesn't require a distinctor antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb4e	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑦𝜑))

Proof of Theorem sb4e

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sb1 1696	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
2		equs5e 1723	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑦𝜑))
3	1, 2	syl 14	1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑦𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102  ∀wal 1287  ∃wex 1426  [wsb 1692

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-5 1381  ax-gen 1383  ax-ie1 1427  ax-ie2 1428  ax-11 1442  ax-4 1445  ax-ial 1472

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-sb 1693

This theorem is referenced by:  hbsb2e  1735