Theorem sb4e 1829

Description: One direction of a simplified definition of substitution that unlike sb4 1856 doesn't require a distinctor antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb4e	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑦𝜑))

Proof of Theorem sb4e

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sb1 1790	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
2		equs5e 1819	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑦𝜑))
3	1, 2	syl 14	1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑦𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104  ∀wal 1371  ∃wex 1516  [wsb 1786

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-5 1471  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-11 1530  ax-4 1534  ax-ial 1558

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-sb 1787

This theorem is referenced by:  hbsb2e  1831