Theorem 3impexp 1355

Description: Version of impexp 454 for a triple conjunction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3impexp	⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))

Proof of Theorem 3impexp

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		id 22	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))
2	1	3expd 1350	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
3		id 22	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
4	3	3impd 1345	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))
5	2, 4	impbii 212	1 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ w3a 1084

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-3an 1086

This theorem is referenced by:  cotr2g  14396  bnj978  32462  ismnuprim  41420  3impexpbicom  41603  3impexpbicomVD  41981