Theorem ax9 2159

Description: Proof of ax-9 2155 from ax9v1 2157 and ax9v2 2158, proving sufficiency of the conjunction of the latter two weakened versions of ax9v 2156, which is itself a weakened version of ax-9 2155. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Dec-2020.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 11-Apr-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax9	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))

Proof of Theorem ax9

Dummy variable 𝑡 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equvinv 2052	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑡(𝑡 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑡 = 𝑦))
2		ax9v2 2158	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑡 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑡))
3	2	equcoms 2043	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑡))
4		ax9v1 2157	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑡 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
5	3, 4	sylan9 516	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑡 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑡 = 𝑦) → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
6	5	exlimiv 1953	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑡(𝑡 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑡 = 𝑦) → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
7	1, 6	sylbi 220	1 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400  ∃wex 1802

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1818  ax-4 1832  ax-5 1933  ax-6 1990  ax-7 2031  ax-9 2155

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-ex 1803

This theorem is referenced by:  elequ2  2160  elALT2  5331  fv3  6889  elirrvOLDOLD  9549  in-ax8  36597  ss-ax8  36598  bj-ax89  37163  axc11next  44980