Theorem bj-ax89 37342

Description: A theorem which could be used as sole axiom for the non-logical predicate instead of ax-8 2148 and ax-9 2156. Indeed, it is implied over propositional calculus by the conjunction of ax-8 2148 and ax-9 2156, as proved here. In the other direction, one can prove ax-8 2148 (respectively ax-9 2156) from bj-ax89 37342 by using mpan2 704 (respectively mpan 703) and equid 2045. TODO: move to main part. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-ax89	⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑡) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑡))

Proof of Theorem bj-ax89

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax8 2152	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧))
2		ax9 2160	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑡 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑡))
3	1, 2	sylan9 517	1 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑡) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑡))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1813

This theorem is used by: (None)