P. 359 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 35801-35900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Definition	df-mfitp 35801*	Define a function that produces the evaluation function, given the interpretation function for a model. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.)
⊢ mFromItp = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∈ X𝑎 ∈ (mSA‘𝑡)(((mUV‘𝑡) “ {((1st ‘𝑡)‘𝑎)}) ↑m X𝑖 ∈ ((mVars‘𝑡)‘𝑎)((mUV‘𝑡) “ {((mType‘𝑡)‘𝑖)})) ↦ (℩𝑛 ∈ ((mUV‘𝑡) ↑pm ((mVL‘𝑡) × (mEx‘𝑡)))∀𝑚 ∈ (mVL‘𝑡)(∀𝑣 ∈ (mVR‘𝑡)⟨𝑚, ((mVH‘𝑡)‘𝑣)⟩𝑛(𝑚‘𝑣) ∧ ∀𝑒∀𝑎∀𝑔(𝑒(mST‘𝑡)⟨𝑎, 𝑔⟩ → ⟨𝑚, 𝑒⟩𝑛(𝑓‘(𝑖 ∈ ((mVars‘𝑡)‘𝑎) ↦ (𝑚𝑛(𝑔‘((mVH‘𝑡)‘𝑖)))))) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ (mEx‘𝑡)(𝑛 “ {⟨𝑚, 𝑒⟩}) = ((𝑛 “ {⟨𝑚, ((mESyn‘𝑡)‘𝑒)⟩}) ∩ ((mUV‘𝑡) “ {(1st ‘𝑒)}))))))
21.6.16  Splitting fields
Syntax	ccpms 35802	Completion of a metric space.
class cplMetSp
Syntax	chlb 35803	Embeddings for a direct limit.
class HomLimB
Syntax	chlim 35804	Direct limit structure.
class HomLim
Syntax	cpfl 35805	Polynomial extension field.
class polyFld
Syntax	csf1 35806	Splitting field for a single polynomial (auxiliary).
class splitFld1
Syntax	csf 35807	Splitting field for a finite set of polynomials.
class splitFld
Syntax	cpsl 35808	Splitting field for a sequence of polynomials.
class polySplitLim
Definition	df-cplmet 35809*	A function which completes the given metric space. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ cplMetSp = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ ⦋((𝑤 ↑s ℕ) ↾s (Cau‘(dist‘𝑤))) / 𝑟⦌⦋(Base‘𝑟) / 𝑣⦌⦋{⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ({𝑓, 𝑔} ⊆ 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℤ (𝑓 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)):(ℤ≥‘𝑗)⟶((𝑔‘𝑗)(ball‘(dist‘𝑤))𝑥))} / 𝑒⦌((𝑟 /s 𝑒) sSet {⟨(dist‘ndx), {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑣 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑣 ((𝑥 = [𝑝]𝑒 ∧ 𝑦 = [𝑞]𝑒) ∧ (𝑝 ∘f (dist‘𝑟)𝑞) ⇝ 𝑧)}⟩}))
Definition	df-homlimb 35810*	The input to this function is a sequence (on ℕ) of homomorphisms 𝐹(𝑛):𝑅(𝑛)⟶𝑅(𝑛 + 1). The resulting structure is the direct limit of the direct system so defined. This function returns the pair ⟨𝑆, 𝐺⟩ where 𝑆 is the terminal object and 𝐺 is a sequence of functions such that 𝐺(𝑛):𝑅(𝑛)⟶𝑆 and 𝐺(𝑛) = 𝐹(𝑛) ∘ 𝐺(𝑛 + 1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ HomLimB = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ ⦋∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ ({𝑛} × dom (𝑓‘𝑛)) / 𝑣⦌⦋∩ {𝑠 ∣ (𝑠 Er 𝑣 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑣 ↦ ⟨((1st ‘𝑥) + 1), ((𝑓‘(1st ‘𝑥))‘(2nd ‘𝑥))⟩) ⊆ 𝑠)} / 𝑒⦌⟨(𝑣 / 𝑒), (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ dom (𝑓‘𝑛) ↦ [⟨𝑛, 𝑥⟩]𝑒))⟩)
Definition	df-homlim 35811*	The input to this function is a sequence (on ℕ) of structures 𝑅(𝑛) and homomorphisms 𝐹(𝑛):𝑅(𝑛)⟶𝑅(𝑛 + 1). The resulting structure is the direct limit of the direct system so defined, and maintains any structures that were present in the original objects. TODO: generalize to directed sets? (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ HomLim = (𝑟 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ ⦋( HomLimB ‘𝑓) / 𝑒⦌⦋(1st ‘𝑒) / 𝑣⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑒) / 𝑔⦌({⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑣⟩, ⟨(+g‘ndx), ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ ran (𝑥 ∈ dom (𝑔‘𝑛), 𝑦 ∈ dom (𝑔‘𝑛) ↦ ⟨⟨((𝑔‘𝑛)‘𝑥), ((𝑔‘𝑛)‘𝑦)⟩, ((𝑔‘𝑛)‘(𝑥(+g‘(𝑟‘𝑛))𝑦))⟩)⟩, ⟨(.r‘ndx), ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ ran (𝑥 ∈ dom (𝑔‘𝑛), 𝑦 ∈ dom (𝑔‘𝑛) ↦ ⟨⟨((𝑔‘𝑛)‘𝑥), ((𝑔‘𝑛)‘𝑦)⟩, ((𝑔‘𝑛)‘(𝑥(.r‘(𝑟‘𝑛))𝑦))⟩)⟩} ∪ {⟨(TopOpen‘ndx), {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑣 ∣ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (◡(𝑔‘𝑛) “ 𝑠) ∈ (TopOpen‘(𝑟‘𝑛))}⟩, ⟨(dist‘ndx), ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ ran (𝑥 ∈ dom ((𝑔‘𝑛)‘𝑛), 𝑦 ∈ dom ((𝑔‘𝑛)‘𝑛) ↦ ⟨⟨((𝑔‘𝑛)‘𝑥), ((𝑔‘𝑛)‘𝑦)⟩, (𝑥(dist‘(𝑟‘𝑛))𝑦)⟩)⟩, ⟨(le‘ndx), ∪ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ (◡(𝑔‘𝑛) ∘ ((le‘(𝑟‘𝑛)) ∘ (𝑔‘𝑛)))⟩}))
Definition	df-plfl 35812*	Define the field extension that augments a field with the root of the given irreducible polynomial, and extends the norm if one exists and the extension is unique. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux and Steven Nguyen, 21-Jun-2025.)
⊢ polyFld = (𝑟 ∈ V, 𝑝 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(Poly1‘𝑟) / 𝑠⦌⦋((RSpan‘𝑠)‘{𝑝}) / 𝑖⦌⦋(𝑐 ∈ (Base‘𝑟) ↦ [(𝑐( ·𝑠 ‘𝑠)(1r‘𝑠))](𝑠 ~QG 𝑖)) / 𝑓⦌⟨⦋(𝑠 /s (𝑠 ~QG 𝑖)) / 𝑡⦌((𝑡 toNrmGrp (℩𝑛 ∈ (AbsVal‘𝑡)(𝑛 ∘ 𝑓) = (norm‘𝑟))) sSet ⟨(le‘ndx), ⦋(𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑡) ↦ (℩𝑞 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑞(rem1p‘𝑟)𝑝) = 𝑞)) / 𝑔⦌(◡𝑔 ∘ ((le‘𝑠) ∘ 𝑔))⟩), 𝑓⟩)
Theorem	rexxfr3d 35813*	Transfer existential quantification from a variable 𝑥 to another variable 𝑦 contained in expression 𝐴. (Contributed by SN, 20-Jun-2025.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = 𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	rexxfr3dALT 35814*	Longer proof of rexxfr3d 35813 using ax-11 2163 instead of ax-12 2185, without the disjoint variable condition 𝐴𝑥𝑦. (Contributed by SN, 19-Jun-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = 𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	rspssbasd 35815	The span of a set of ring elements is a set of ring elements. (Contributed by SN, 19-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐾 = (RSpan‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾‘𝐺) ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	ellcsrspsn 35816*	Membership in a left coset in a quotient of a ring by the span of a singleton (that is, by the ideal generated by an element). This characterization comes from eqglact 19112 and elrspsn 21199. (Contributed by SN, 19-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ ∼ = (𝑅 ~QG 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑅 /s ∼ )    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = ((RSpan‘𝑅)‘{𝑀})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝑈))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑋 = [𝑥] ∼ ∧ 𝑋 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑥 + (𝑦 · 𝑀))}))
Theorem	ply1divalg3 35817*	Uniqueness of polynomial remainder: convert the subtraction in ply1divalg2 26104 to addition. (Contributed by SN, 20-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (.r‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Unic1p‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑞 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐷‘(𝐹 + (𝑞 ∙ 𝐺))) < (𝐷‘𝐺))
Theorem	r1peuqusdeg1 35818*	Uniqueness of polynomial remainder in terms of a quotient structure in the sense of the right hand side of r1pid2 26127. (Contributed by SN, 21-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Poly1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = ((RSpan‘𝑃)‘{𝐹})    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑃 /s (𝑃 ~QG 𝐼))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (Base‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Unic1p‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (deg1‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Domn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑄)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑞 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐷‘𝑞) < (𝐷‘𝐹))
Definition	df-sfl1 35819*	Temporary construction for the splitting field of a polynomial. The inputs are a field 𝑟 and a polynomial 𝑝 that we want to split, along with a tuple 𝑗 in the same format as the output. The output is a tuple ⟨𝑆, 𝐹⟩ where 𝑆 is the splitting field and 𝐹 is an injective homomorphism from the original field 𝑟. The function works by repeatedly finding the smallest monic irreducible factor, and extending the field by that factor using the polyFld construction. We keep track of a total order in each of the splitting fields so that we can pick an element definably without needing global choice. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ splitFld1 = (𝑟 ∈ V, 𝑗 ∈ V ↦ (𝑝 ∈ (Poly1‘𝑟) ↦ (rec((𝑠 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(Poly1‘𝑠) / 𝑚⦌⦋{𝑔 ∈ ((Monic1p‘𝑠) ∩ (Irred‘𝑚)) ∣ (𝑔(∥r‘𝑚)(𝑝 ∘ 𝑓) ∧ 1 < (𝑠deg1𝑔))} / 𝑏⦌if(((𝑝 ∘ 𝑓) = (0g‘𝑚) ∨ 𝑏 = ∅), ⟨𝑠, 𝑓⟩, ⦋(glb‘𝑏) / ℎ⦌⦋(𝑠 polyFld ℎ) / 𝑡⦌⟨(1st ‘𝑡), (𝑓 ∘ (2nd ‘𝑡))⟩)), 𝑗)‘(card‘(1...(𝑟deg1𝑝))))))
Definition	df-sfl 35820*	Define the splitting field of a finite collection of polynomials, given a total ordered base field. The output is a tuple ⟨𝑆, 𝐹⟩ where 𝑆 is the totally ordered splitting field and 𝐹 is an injective homomorphism from the original field 𝑟. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ splitFld = (𝑟 ∈ V, 𝑝 ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑓(𝑓 Isom < , (lt‘𝑟)((1...(♯‘𝑝)), 𝑝) ∧ 𝑥 = (seq0((𝑒 ∈ V, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑟 splitFld1 𝑒)‘𝑔)), (𝑓 ∪ {⟨0, ⟨𝑟, ( I ↾ (Base‘𝑟))⟩⟩}))‘(♯‘𝑝)))))
Definition	df-psl 35821*	Define the direct limit of an increasing sequence of fields produced by pasting together the splitting fields for each sequence of polynomials. That is, given a ring 𝑟, a strict order on 𝑟, and a sequence 𝑝:ℕ⟶(𝒫 𝑟 ∩ Fin) of finite sets of polynomials to split, we construct the direct limit system of field extensions by splitting one set at a time and passing the resulting construction to HomLim. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ polySplitLim = (𝑟 ∈ V, 𝑝 ∈ ((𝒫 (Base‘𝑟) ∩ Fin) ↑m ℕ) ↦ ⦋(1st ∘ seq0((𝑔 ∈ V, 𝑞 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑔) / 𝑒⦌⦋(1st ‘𝑒) / 𝑠⦌⦋(𝑠 splitFld ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝑞 ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (2nd ‘𝑔)))) / 𝑓⦌⟨𝑓, ((2nd ‘𝑔) ∘ (2nd ‘𝑓))⟩), (𝑝 ∪ {⟨0, ⟨⟨𝑟, ∅⟩, ( I ↾ (Base‘𝑟))⟩⟩}))) / 𝑓⦌((1st ∘ (𝑓 shift 1)) HomLim (2nd ∘ 𝑓)))
21.6.17  p-adic number fields
Syntax	czr 35822	Integral elements of a ring.
class ZRing
Syntax	cgf 35823	Galois finite field.
class GF
Syntax	cgfo 35824	Galois limit field.
class GF∞
Syntax	ceqp 35825	Equivalence relation for df-qp 35836.
class ~Qp
Syntax	crqp 35826	Equivalence relation representatives for df-qp 35836.
class /Qp
Syntax	cqp 35827	The set of 𝑝-adic rational numbers.
class Qp
Syntax	czp 35828	The set of 𝑝-adic integers. (Not to be confused with czn 21461.)
class Zp
Syntax	cqpa 35829	Algebraic completion of the 𝑝-adic rational numbers.
class _Qp
Syntax	ccp 35830	Metric completion of _Qp.
class Cp
Definition	df-zrng 35831	Define the subring of integral elements in a ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ZRing = (𝑟 ∈ V ↦ (𝑟 IntgRing ran (ℤRHom‘𝑟)))
Definition	df-gf 35832*	Define the Galois finite field of order 𝑝↑𝑛. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ GF = (𝑝 ∈ ℙ, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(ℤ/nℤ‘𝑝) / 𝑟⦌(1st ‘(𝑟 splitFld {⦋(Poly1‘𝑟) / 𝑠⦌⦋(var1‘𝑟) / 𝑥⦌(((𝑝↑𝑛)(.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑠))𝑥)(-g‘𝑠)𝑥)})))
Definition	df-gfoo 35833*	Define the Galois field of order 𝑝↑+∞, as a direct limit of the Galois finite fields. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ GF∞ = (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ ⦋(ℤ/nℤ‘𝑝) / 𝑟⦌(𝑟 polySplitLim (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ {⦋(Poly1‘𝑟) / 𝑠⦌⦋(var1‘𝑟) / 𝑥⦌(((𝑝↑𝑛)(.g‘(mulGrp‘𝑠))𝑥)(-g‘𝑠)𝑥)})))
Definition	df-eqp 35834*	Define an equivalence relation on ℤ-indexed sequences of integers such that two sequences are equivalent iff the difference is equivalent to zero, and a sequence is equivalent to zero iff the sum Σ𝑘 ≤ 𝑛𝑓(𝑘)(𝑝↑𝑘) is a multiple of 𝑝↑(𝑛 + 1) for every 𝑛. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ~Qp = (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ({𝑓, 𝑔} ⊆ (ℤ ↑m ℤ) ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℤ Σ𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘-𝑛)(((𝑓‘-𝑘) − (𝑔‘-𝑘)) / (𝑝↑(𝑘 + (𝑛 + 1)))) ∈ ℤ)})
Definition	df-rqp 35835*	There is a unique element of (ℤ ↑m (0...(𝑝 − 1))) ~Qp -equivalent to any element of (ℤ ↑m ℤ), if the sequences are zero for sufficiently large negative values; this function selects that element. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ /Qp = (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ (~Qp ∩ ⦋{𝑓 ∈ (ℤ ↑m ℤ) ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ran ℤ≥(◡𝑓 “ (ℤ ∖ {0})) ⊆ 𝑥} / 𝑦⦌(𝑦 × (𝑦 ∩ (ℤ ↑m (0...(𝑝 − 1)))))))
Definition	df-qp 35836*	Define the 𝑝-adic completion of the rational numbers, as a normed field structure with a total order (that is not compatible with the operations). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.) (Revised by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Qp = (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ ⦋{ℎ ∈ (ℤ ↑m (0...(𝑝 − 1))) ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ran ℤ≥(◡ℎ “ (ℤ ∖ {0})) ⊆ 𝑥} / 𝑏⦌(({⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑏⟩, ⟨(+g‘ndx), (𝑓 ∈ 𝑏, 𝑔 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ ((/Qp‘𝑝)‘(𝑓 ∘f + 𝑔)))⟩, ⟨(.r‘ndx), (𝑓 ∈ 𝑏, 𝑔 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ ((/Qp‘𝑝)‘(𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℤ ((𝑓‘𝑘) · (𝑔‘(𝑛 − 𝑘))))))⟩} ∪ {⟨(le‘ndx), {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ({𝑓, 𝑔} ⊆ 𝑏 ∧ Σ𝑘 ∈ ℤ ((𝑓‘-𝑘) · ((𝑝 + 1)↑-𝑘)) < Σ𝑘 ∈ ℤ ((𝑔‘-𝑘) · ((𝑝 + 1)↑-𝑘)))}⟩}) toNrmGrp (𝑓 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ if(𝑓 = (ℤ × {0}), 0, (𝑝↑-inf((◡𝑓 “ (ℤ ∖ {0})), ℝ, < ))))))
Definition	df-zp 35837	Define the 𝑝-adic integers, as a subset of the 𝑝-adic rationals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ Zp = (ZRing ∘ Qp)
Definition	df-qpa 35838*	Define the completion of the 𝑝-adic rationals. Here we simply define it as the splitting field of a dense sequence of polynomials (using as the 𝑛-th set the collection of polynomials with degree less than 𝑛 and with coefficients < (𝑝↑𝑛)). Krasner's lemma will then show that all monic polynomials have splitting fields isomorphic to a sufficiently close Eisenstein polynomial from the list, and unramified extensions are generated by the polynomial 𝑥↑(𝑝↑𝑛) − 𝑥, which is in the list. Thus, every finite extension of Qp is a subfield of this field extension, so it is algebraically closed. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ _Qp = (𝑝 ∈ ℙ ↦ ⦋(Qp‘𝑝) / 𝑟⦌(𝑟 polySplitLim (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ {𝑓 ∈ (Poly1‘𝑟) ∣ ((𝑟deg1𝑓) ≤ 𝑛 ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ ran (coe1‘𝑓)(◡𝑑 “ (ℤ ∖ {0})) ⊆ (0...𝑛))})))
Definition	df-cp 35839	Define the metric completion of the algebraic completion of the 𝑝 -adic rationals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.)
⊢ Cp = ( cplMetSp ∘ _Qp)
21.7  Mathbox for Filip Cernatescu I hope someone will enjoy solving (proving) the simple equations, inequalities, and calculations from this mathbox. I have proved these problems (theorems) using the Milpgame proof assistant. (It can be downloaded from https://us.metamath.org/other/milpgame/milpgame.html.)
Theorem	problem1 35840	Practice problem 1. Clues: 5p4e9 12302 3p2e5 12295 eqtri 2760 oveq1i 7370. (Contributed by Filip Cernatescu, 16-Mar-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((3 + 2) + 4) = 9
Theorem	problem2 35841	Practice problem 2. Clues: oveq12i 7372 adddiri 11149 add4i 11362 mulcli 11143 recni 11150 2re 12223 3eqtri 2764 10re 12630 5re 12236 1re 11136 4re 12233 eqcomi 2746 5p4e9 12302 oveq1i 7370 df-3 12213. (Contributed by Filip Cernatescu, 16-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((2 · ;10) + 5) + ((1 · ;10) + 4)) = ((3 · ;10) + 9)
Theorem	problem3 35842	Practice problem 3. Clues: eqcomi 2746 eqtri 2760 subaddrii 11474 recni 11150 4re 12233 3re 12229 1re 11136 df-4 12214 addcomi 11328. (Contributed by Filip Cernatescu, 16-Mar-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ (𝐴 + 3) = 4    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = 1
Theorem	problem4 35843	Practice problem 4. Clues: pm3.2i 470 eqcomi 2746 eqtri 2760 subaddrii 11474 recni 11150 7re 12242 6re 12239 ax-1cn 11088 df-7 12217 ax-mp 5 oveq1i 7370 3cn 12230 2cn 12224 df-3 12213 mullidi 11141 subdiri 11591 mp3an 1464 mulcli 11143 subadd23 11396 oveq2i 7371 oveq12i 7372 3t2e6 12310 mulcomi 11144 subcli 11461 biimpri 228 subadd2i 11473. (Contributed by Filip Cernatescu, 16-Mar-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 3    &   ⊢ ((3 · 𝐴) + (2 · 𝐵)) = 7    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 1 ∧ 𝐵 = 2)
Theorem	problem5 35844	Practice problem 5. Clues: 3brtr3i 5128 mpbi 230 breqtri 5124 ltaddsubi 11702 remulcli 11152 2re 12223 3re 12229 9re 12248 eqcomi 2746 mvlladdi 11403 3cn 6cn 12240 eqtr3i 2762 6p3e9 12304 addcomi 11328 ltdiv1ii 12075 6re 12239 nngt0i 12188 2nn 12222 divcan3i 11891 recni 11150 2cn 12224 2ne0 12253 mpbir 231 eqtri 2760 mulcomi 11144 3t2e6 12310 divmuli 11899. (Contributed by Filip Cernatescu, 16-Mar-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ ((2 · 𝐴) + 3) < 9    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 < 3
Theorem	quad3 35845	Variant of quadratic equation with discriminant expanded. (Contributed by Filip Cernatescu, 19-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 0    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ ((𝐴 · (𝑋↑2)) + ((𝐵 · 𝑋) + 𝐶)) = 0    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 = ((-𝐵 + (√‘((𝐵↑2) − (4 · (𝐴 · 𝐶))))) / (2 · 𝐴)) ∨ 𝑋 = ((-𝐵 − (√‘((𝐵↑2) − (4 · (𝐴 · 𝐶))))) / (2 · 𝐴)))
21.8  Mathbox for Paul Chapman
21.8.1  Real and complex numbers (cont.)
Theorem	climuzcnv 35846*	Utility lemma to convert between 𝑚 ≤ 𝑘 and 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) in limit theorems. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 10-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑚 ∈ ℕ → ((𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ → (𝑚 ≤ 𝑘 → 𝜑))))
Theorem	sinccvglem 35847*	((sin‘𝑥) / 𝑥) ⇝ 1 as (real) 𝑥 ⇝ 0. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 10-Nov-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶(ℝ ∖ {0}))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 0)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ (ℝ ∖ {0}) ↦ ((sin‘𝑥) / 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ (1 − ((𝑥↑2) / 3)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) < 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) ⇝ 1)
Theorem	sinccvg 35848*	((sin‘𝑥) / 𝑥) ⇝ 1 as (real) 𝑥 ⇝ 0. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹:ℕ⟶(ℝ ∖ {0}) ∧ 𝐹 ⇝ 0) → ((𝑥 ∈ (ℝ ∖ {0}) ↦ ((sin‘𝑥) / 𝑥)) ∘ 𝐹) ⇝ 1)
Theorem	circum 35849*	The circumference of a circle of radius 𝑅, defined as the limit as 𝑛 ⇝ +∞ of the perimeter of an inscribed n-sided isogons, is ((2 · π) · 𝑅). (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 = ((2 · π) / 𝑛)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((2 · 𝑛) · (𝑅 · (sin‘(𝐴 / 2)))))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ ℝ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑃 ⇝ ((2 · π) · 𝑅)
21.8.2  Miscellaneous theorems
Theorem	elfzm12 35850	Membership in a curtailed finite sequence of integers. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝑀 ∈ (1...(𝑁 − 1)) → 𝑀 ∈ (1...𝑁)))
Theorem	nn0seqcvg 35851*	A strictly-decreasing nonnegative integer sequence with initial term 𝑁 reaches zero by the 𝑁 th term. Inference version. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Mar-2011.)
⊢ 𝐹:ℕ0⟶ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐹‘0)    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 → ((𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≠ 0 → (𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)) < (𝐹‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹‘𝑁) = 0
Theorem	lediv2aALT 35852	Division of both sides of 'less than or equal to' by a nonnegative number. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 7-Sep-2007.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐶)) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 → (𝐶 / 𝐵) ≤ (𝐶 / 𝐴)))
Theorem	abs2sqlei 35853	The absolute values of two numbers compare as their squares. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 7-Sep-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((abs‘𝐴) ≤ (abs‘𝐵) ↔ ((abs‘𝐴)↑2) ≤ ((abs‘𝐵)↑2))
Theorem	abs2sqlti 35854	The absolute values of two numbers compare as their squares. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 7-Sep-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((abs‘𝐴) < (abs‘𝐵) ↔ ((abs‘𝐴)↑2) < ((abs‘𝐵)↑2))
Theorem	abs2sqle 35855	The absolute values of two numbers compare as their squares. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 7-Sep-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((abs‘𝐴) ≤ (abs‘𝐵) ↔ ((abs‘𝐴)↑2) ≤ ((abs‘𝐵)↑2)))
Theorem	abs2sqlt 35856	The absolute values of two numbers compare as their squares. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 7-Sep-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((abs‘𝐴) < (abs‘𝐵) ↔ ((abs‘𝐴)↑2) < ((abs‘𝐵)↑2)))
Theorem	abs2difi 35857	Difference of absolute values. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 7-Sep-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ ((abs‘𝐴) − (abs‘𝐵)) ≤ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵))
Theorem	abs2difabsi 35858	Absolute value of difference of absolute values. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 7-Sep-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   ⊢ (abs‘((abs‘𝐴) − (abs‘𝐵))) ≤ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵))
21.9  Mathbox for Hongxiu Chen
Theorem	2thALT 35859	Alternate proof of 2th 264. (Contributed by Hongxiu Chen, 29-Jun-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	orbi2iALT 35860	Alternate proof of orbi2i 913. (Contributed by Hongxiu Chen, 29-Jun-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm3.48ALT 35861	Alternate proof of pm3.48 966. (Contributed by Hongxiu Chen, 29-Jun-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 → 𝜃)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)))
Theorem	3jcadALT 35862	Alternate proof of 3jcad 1130. (Contributed by Hongxiu Chen, 29-Jun-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) Use 3jcad instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)))
21.10  Mathbox for Adrian Ducourtial
21.10.1  Propositional calculus
Theorem	currybi 35863	Biconditional version of Curry's paradox. If some proposition 𝜑 amounts to the self-referential statement "This very statement is equivalent to 𝜓", then 𝜓 is true. See bj-currypara 36735 in BJ's mathbox for the classical version. (Contributed by Adrian Ducourtial, 18-Mar-2025.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) → 𝜓)
Theorem	antnest 35864	Suppose 𝜑, 𝜓 are distinct atomic propositional formulas, and let Γ be the smallest class of formulas for which ⊤ ∈ Γ and (𝜒 → 𝜑), (𝜒 → 𝜓) ∈ Γ for 𝜒 ∈ Γ. The present theorem is then an element of Γ, and the implications occurring in the theorem are in one-to-one correspondence with the formulas in Γ up to logical equivalence. In particular, the theorem itself is equivalent to ⊤ ∈ Γ. (Contributed by Adrian Ducourtial, 2-Oct-2025.)
⊢ ((((((⊤ → 𝜑) → 𝜓) → 𝜓) → 𝜑) → 𝜓) → 𝜓)
Theorem	antnestlaw3lem 35865	Lemma for antnestlaw3 35868. (Contributed by Adrian Ducourtial, 5-Dec-2025.)
⊢ (¬ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) → 𝜒) → ¬ (((𝜑 → 𝜒) → 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	antnestlaw1 35866	A law of nested antecedents. The converse direction is a subschema of pm2.27 42. (Contributed by Adrian Ducourtial, 5-Dec-2025.)
⊢ ((((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓) → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	antnestlaw2 35867	A law of nested antecedents. (Contributed by Adrian Ducourtial, 5-Dec-2025.)
⊢ ((((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ (((𝜑 → 𝜒) → 𝜓) → 𝜒))
Theorem	antnestlaw3 35868	A law of nested antecedents. Compare with looinv 203. (Contributed by Adrian Ducourtial, 5-Dec-2025.)
⊢ ((((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) → 𝜒) ↔ (((𝜑 → 𝜒) → 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	antnestALT 35869	Alternative proof of antnest 35864 from the valid schema ((((⊤ → 𝜑) → 𝜑) → 𝜓) → 𝜓) using laws of nested antecedents. Our proof uses only the laws antnestlaw1 35866 and antnestlaw3 35868. (Contributed by Adrian Ducourtial, 5-Dec-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((((((⊤ → 𝜑) → 𝜓) → 𝜓) → 𝜑) → 𝜓) → 𝜓)
21.10.2  Clone theory
Syntax	ccloneop 35870	Syntax for the function of the class of operations on a set.
class CloneOp
Definition	df-cloneop 35871*	Define the function that sends a set to the class of clone-theoretic operations on the set. For convenience, we take an operation on 𝑎 to be a function on finite sequences of elements of 𝑎 (rather than tuples) with values in 𝑎. Following line 6 of [Szendrei] p. 11, the arity 𝑛 of an operation (here, the length of the sequences at which the operation is defined) is always finite and non-zero, whence 𝑛 is taken to be a non-zero finite ordinal. (Contributed by Adrian Ducourtial, 3-Apr-2025.)
⊢ CloneOp = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ↑m (𝑎 ↑m 𝑛))})
Syntax	cprj 35872	Syntax for the function of projections on sets.
class prj
Definition	df-prj 35873*	Define the function that, for a set 𝑎, arity 𝑛, and index 𝑖, returns the 𝑖-th 𝑛-ary projection on 𝑎. This is the 𝑛-ary operation on 𝑎 that, for any sequence of 𝑛 elements of 𝑎, returns the element having index 𝑖. (Contributed by Adrian Ducourtial, 3-Apr-2025.)
⊢ prj = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o), 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ↑m 𝑛) ↦ (𝑥‘𝑖))))
Syntax	csuppos 35874	Syntax for the function of superpositions.
class suppos
Definition	df-suppos 35875*	Define the function that, when given an 𝑛-ary operation 𝑓 and 𝑛 many 𝑚-ary operations (𝑔‘∅), ..., (𝑔‘∪ 𝑛), returns the superposition of 𝑓 with the (𝑔‘𝑖), itself another 𝑚-ary operation on 𝑎. Given 𝑥 (a sequence of 𝑚 arguments in 𝑎), the superposition effectively applies each of the (𝑔‘𝑖) to 𝑥, then applies 𝑓 to the resulting sequence of 𝑛 function values. This can be seen as a generalized version of function composition; see paragraph 3 of [Szendrei] p. 11. (Contributed by Adrian Ducourtial, 3-Apr-2025.)
⊢ suppos = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ (𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o), 𝑚 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o) ↦ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑎 ↑m (𝑎 ↑m 𝑛)), 𝑔 ∈ ((𝑎 ↑m (𝑎 ↑m 𝑚)) ↑m 𝑛) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (𝑎 ↑m 𝑚) ↦ (𝑓‘(𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ↦ ((𝑔‘𝑖)‘𝑥)))))))
21.11  Mathbox for Scott Fenton
21.11.1  ZFC Axioms in primitive form
Theorem	axextprim 35876	ax-ext 2709 without distinct variable conditions or defined symbols. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2010.)
⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
Theorem	axrepprim 35877	ax-rep 5225 without distinct variable conditions or defined symbols. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2010.)
⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ (¬ ∀𝑦 ¬ ∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∀𝑧 ¬ ((∀𝑦 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ ∀𝑥(∀𝑧 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑦𝜑)) → ¬ (¬ ∀𝑥(∀𝑧 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑦𝜑) → ∀𝑦 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)))
Theorem	axunprim 35878	ax-un 7682 without distinct variable conditions or defined symbols. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2010.)
⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑦(¬ ∀𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	axpowprim 35879	ax-pow 5311 without distinct variable conditions or defined symbols. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2010.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑦(∀𝑥(¬ ∀𝑧 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
Theorem	axregprim 35880	ax-reg 9501 without distinct variable conditions or defined symbols. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2010.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)))
Theorem	axinfprim 35881	ax-inf 9551 without distinct variable conditions or defined symbols. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Oct-2010.)
⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → ¬ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ ∀𝑧(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))))
Theorem	axacprim 35882	ax-ac 10373 without distinct variable conditions or defined symbols. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2010.)
⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑥 ¬ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) → ¬ ∀𝑤 ¬ ∀𝑦 ¬ ((¬ ∀𝑤(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 → ¬ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥))) → 𝑦 = 𝑤) → ¬ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → ¬ ∀𝑤(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 → ¬ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥))))))
21.11.2  Untangled classes
Theorem	untelirr 35883*	We call a class "untanged" if all its members are not members of themselves. The term originates from Isbell (see citation in dfon2 35965). Using this concept, we can avoid a lot of the uses of the Axiom of Regularity. Here, we prove a series of properties of untanged classes. First, we prove that an untangled class is not a member of itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Feb-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	untuni 35884*	The union of a class is untangled iff all its members are untangled. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Feb-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	untsucf 35885*	If a class is untangled, then so is its successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 → ∀𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦)
Theorem	unt0 35886	The null set is untangled. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥
Theorem	untint 35887*	If there is an untangled element of a class, then the intersection of the class is untangled. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦)
Theorem	efrunt 35888*	If 𝐴 is well-founded by E, then it is untangled. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Mar-2011.)
⊢ ( E Fr 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	untangtr 35889*	A transitive class is untangled iff its elements are. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦))
21.11.3  Extra propositional calculus theorems
Theorem	3jaodd 35890	Double deduction form of 3jaoi 1431. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Apr-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜏) → 𝜂)))
Theorem	3orit 35891	Closed form of 3ori 1427. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Apr-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝜒))
Theorem	biimpexp 35892	A biconditional in the antecedent is the same as two implications. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Dec-2010.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 → 𝜑) → 𝜒)))
21.11.4  Misc. Useful Theorems
Theorem	nepss 35893	Two classes are unequal iff their intersection is a proper subset of one of them. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Feb-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊊ 𝐴 ∨ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊊ 𝐵))
Theorem	3ccased 35894	Triple disjunction form of ccased 1039. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜁) → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜎) → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜁) → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜎) → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜏 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜏 ∧ 𝜁) → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜒 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜏) ∧ (𝜂 ∨ 𝜁 ∨ 𝜎)) → 𝜓))
Theorem	dfso3 35895*	Expansion of the definition of a strict order. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Jun-2016.)
⊢ (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥 ∧ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧) ∧ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	brtpid1 35896	A binary relation involving unordered triples. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2016.)
⊢ 𝐴{⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶, 𝐷}𝐵
Theorem	brtpid2 35897	A binary relation involving unordered triples. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2016.)
⊢ 𝐴{𝐶, ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐷}𝐵
Theorem	brtpid3 35898	A binary relation involving unordered triples. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2016.)
⊢ 𝐴{𝐶, 𝐷, ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}𝐵
Theorem	iota5f 35899*	A method for computing iota. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Dec-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐴)
Theorem	jath 35900	Closed form of ja 186. Proved using the completeness script. (Proof modification is discouraged.) (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜒) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒)))