Theorem ceqsrexv2TEMP 36530

Description: Alternate elimitation of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Sep-2017.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ceqsrexv2TEMP.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsrexv2TEMP	⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsrexv2TEMP

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ceqsrexv2TEMP.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
2	1	ceqsrexbv 3591	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 397   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2104  ∃wrex 3070

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2106  ax-9 2114  ax-ext 2707

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2814  df-rex 3071

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsralv2TEMP  36531