Theorem ceqsrexbv 3579

Description: Elimination of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Mar-2014.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ceqsrexv.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsrexbv	⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsrexbv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		r19.42v 3276	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
2		eleq1 2826	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
3	2	adantr 480	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
4	3	pm5.32ri 575	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
5	4	bicomi 223	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
6	5	baib 535	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
7	6	rexbiia 3176	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
8		ceqsrexv.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
9	8	ceqsrexv 3578	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
10	9	pm5.32i 574	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))
11	1, 7, 10	3bitr3i 300	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  ∃wrex 3064

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1784  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-rex 3069

This theorem is referenced by:  marypha2lem2  9125  txkgen  22711  ceqsrexv2  33570  eq0rabdioph  40514