![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ceqsrexbv | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Elimination of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Mar-2014.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ceqsrexv.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ceqsrexbv | ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | r19.42v 3188 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
2 | eleq1 2826 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
3 | 2 | adantr 480 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)) |
4 | 3 | pm5.32ri 575 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
5 | 4 | bicomi 224 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
6 | 5 | baib 535 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
7 | 6 | rexbiia 3089 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) |
8 | ceqsrexv.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
9 | 8 | ceqsrexv 3654 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)) |
10 | 9 | pm5.32i 574 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) |
11 | 1, 7, 10 | 3bitr3i 301 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1536 ∈ wcel 2105 ∃wrex 3067 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1791 ax-4 1805 ax-5 1907 ax-6 1964 ax-7 2004 ax-8 2107 ax-9 2115 ax-ext 2705 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-tru 1539 df-ex 1776 df-sb 2062 df-clab 2712 df-cleq 2726 df-clel 2813 df-rex 3068 |
This theorem is referenced by: ceqsralbv 3656 marypha2lem2 9473 psdmul 22187 txkgen 23675 eq0rabdioph 42763 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |