MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  df-trkg Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Definition df-trkg 28475
Description: Define the class of Tarski geometries. A Tarski geometry is a set of points, equipped with a betweenness relation (denoting that a point lies on a line segment between two other points) and a congruence relation (denoting equality of line segment lengths). Here, we are using the following:
  • for congruence, (𝑥 𝑦) = (𝑧 𝑤) where = (dist‘𝑊)
  • for betweenness, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧), where 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝑊)
With this definition, the axiom A2 is actually equivalent to the transitivity of equality, eqtrd 2774.

Tarski originally had more axioms, but later reduced his list to 11:

  • A1 A kind of reflexivity for the congruence relation (TarskiGC)
  • A2 Transitivity for the congruence relation (TarskiGC)
  • A3 Identity for the congruence relation (TarskiGC)
  • A4 Axiom of segment construction (TarskiGCB)
  • A5 5-segment axiom (TarskiGCB)
  • A6 Identity for the betweenness relation (TarskiGB)
  • A7 Axiom of Pasch (TarskiGB)
  • A8 Lower dimension axiom (DimTarskiG≥ “ {2})
  • A9 Upper dimension axiom (V ∖ (DimTarskiG≥ “ {3}))
  • A10 Euclid's axiom (TarskiGE)
  • A11 Axiom of continuity (TarskiGB)
Our definition is split into 5 parts:
  • congruence axioms TarskiGC (which metric spaces fulfill)
  • betweenness axioms TarskiGB
  • congruence and betweenness axioms TarskiGCB
  • upper and lower dimension axioms DimTarskiG
  • axiom of Euclid / parallel postulate TarskiGE

So our definition of a Tarskian Geometry includes the 3 axioms for the quaternary congruence relation (A1, A2, A3), the 3 axioms for the ternary betweenness relation (A6, A7, A11), and the 2 axioms of compatibility of the congruence and the betweenness relations (A4,A5).

It does not include Euclid's axiom A10, nor the 2-dimensional axioms A8 (Lower dimension axiom) and A9 (Upper dimension axiom) so the number of dimensions of the geometry it formalizes is not constrained.

Considering A2 as one of the 3 axioms for the quaternary congruence relation is somewhat conventional, because the transitivity of the congruence relation is automatically given by our choice to take the distance as this congruence relation in our definition of Tarski geometries. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2019.)

Assertion
Ref Expression
df-trkg TarskiG = ((TarskiGC ∩ TarskiGB) ∩ (TarskiGCB ∩ {𝑓[(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖](LineG‘𝑓) = (𝑥𝑝, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧𝑝 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))})}))
Distinct variable group:   𝑓,𝑝,𝑖,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Detailed syntax breakdown of Definition df-trkg
StepHypRef Expression
1 cstrkg 28449 . 2 class TarskiG
2 cstrkgc 28450 . . . 4 class TarskiGC
3 cstrkgb 28451 . . . 4 class TarskiGB
42, 3cin 3961 . . 3 class (TarskiGC ∩ TarskiGB)
5 cstrkgcb 28452 . . . 4 class TarskiGCB
6 vf . . . . . . . . . 10 setvar 𝑓
76cv 1535 . . . . . . . . 9 class 𝑓
8 clng 28456 . . . . . . . . 9 class LineG
97, 8cfv 6562 . . . . . . . 8 class (LineG‘𝑓)
10 vx . . . . . . . . 9 setvar 𝑥
11 vy . . . . . . . . 9 setvar 𝑦
12 vp . . . . . . . . . 10 setvar 𝑝
1312cv 1535 . . . . . . . . 9 class 𝑝
1410cv 1535 . . . . . . . . . . 11 class 𝑥
1514csn 4630 . . . . . . . . . 10 class {𝑥}
1613, 15cdif 3959 . . . . . . . . 9 class (𝑝 ∖ {𝑥})
17 vz . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 setvar 𝑧
1817cv 1535 . . . . . . . . . . . 12 class 𝑧
1911cv 1535 . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 class 𝑦
20 vi . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 setvar 𝑖
2120cv 1535 . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 class 𝑖
2214, 19, 21co 7430 . . . . . . . . . . . 12 class (𝑥𝑖𝑦)
2318, 22wcel 2105 . . . . . . . . . . 11 wff 𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦)
2418, 19, 21co 7430 . . . . . . . . . . . 12 class (𝑧𝑖𝑦)
2514, 24wcel 2105 . . . . . . . . . . 11 wff 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦)
2614, 18, 21co 7430 . . . . . . . . . . . 12 class (𝑥𝑖𝑧)
2719, 26wcel 2105 . . . . . . . . . . 11 wff 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧)
2823, 25, 27w3o 1085 . . . . . . . . . 10 wff (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))
2928, 17, 13crab 3432 . . . . . . . . 9 class {𝑧𝑝 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))}
3010, 11, 13, 16, 29cmpo 7432 . . . . . . . 8 class (𝑥𝑝, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧𝑝 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))})
319, 30wceq 1536 . . . . . . 7 wff (LineG‘𝑓) = (𝑥𝑝, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧𝑝 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))})
32 citv 28455 . . . . . . . 8 class Itv
337, 32cfv 6562 . . . . . . 7 class (Itv‘𝑓)
3431, 20, 33wsbc 3790 . . . . . 6 wff [(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖](LineG‘𝑓) = (𝑥𝑝, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧𝑝 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))})
35 cbs 17244 . . . . . . 7 class Base
367, 35cfv 6562 . . . . . 6 class (Base‘𝑓)
3734, 12, 36wsbc 3790 . . . . 5 wff [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖](LineG‘𝑓) = (𝑥𝑝, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧𝑝 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))})
3837, 6cab 2711 . . . 4 class {𝑓[(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖](LineG‘𝑓) = (𝑥𝑝, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧𝑝 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))})}
395, 38cin 3961 . . 3 class (TarskiGCB ∩ {𝑓[(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖](LineG‘𝑓) = (𝑥𝑝, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧𝑝 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))})})
404, 39cin 3961 . 2 class ((TarskiGC ∩ TarskiGB) ∩ (TarskiGCB ∩ {𝑓[(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖](LineG‘𝑓) = (𝑥𝑝, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧𝑝 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))})}))
411, 40wceq 1536 1 wff TarskiG = ((TarskiGC ∩ TarskiGB) ∩ (TarskiGCB ∩ {𝑓[(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖](LineG‘𝑓) = (𝑥𝑝, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧𝑝 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))})}))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
This definition is referenced by:  axtgcgrrflx  28484  axtgcgrid  28485  axtgsegcon  28486  axtg5seg  28487  axtgbtwnid  28488  axtgpasch  28489  axtgcont1  28490  tglng  28568  f1otrg  28893  eengtrkg  29015
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator