![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > elabgw | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Membership in a class abstraction, using two substitution hypotheses to avoid a disjoint variable condition on 𝑥 and 𝐴. This is to elabg 3690 what sbievw2 2098 is to sbievw 2093. (Contributed by SN, 20-Apr-2024.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elabgw.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
elabgw.2 | ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elabgw | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜒)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | eleq1 2832 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})) | |
2 | elabgw.2 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
3 | df-clab 2718 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | |
4 | elabgw.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
5 | 4 | sbievw 2093 | . . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) |
6 | 3, 5 | bitri 275 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓) |
7 | 1, 2, 6 | vtoclbg 3569 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜒)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 = wceq 1537 [wsb 2064 ∈ wcel 2108 {cab 2717 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1793 ax-4 1807 ax-5 1909 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2007 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-ext 2711 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-tru 1540 df-ex 1778 df-sb 2065 df-clab 2718 df-cleq 2732 df-clel 2819 |
This theorem is referenced by: elab2gw 3693 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |