P. 419 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 41801-41900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	omltoe 41801	Exponentiation eventually dominates multiplication. (Contributed by RP, 3-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((1o ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐵 ·o 𝐴) ∈ (𝐵 ↑o 𝐴)))
21.32.3  Surreal Contributions
Theorem	abeqabi 41802	Generalized condition for a class abstraction to be equal to some class. (Contributed by RP, 2-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	abpr 41803*	Condition for a class abstraction to be a pair. (Contributed by RP, 25-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑌, 𝑍} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑍)))
Theorem	abtp 41804*	Condition for a class abstraction to be a triple. (Contributed by RP, 25-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑋, 𝑌, 𝑍} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑋 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑍)))
Theorem	ralopabb 41805*	Restricted universal quantification over an ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by RP, 25-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    &   ⊢ (𝑜 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑜 ∈ 𝑂 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜒))
Theorem	fpwfvss 41806	Functions into a powerset always have values which are subsets. This is dependant on our convention when the argument is not part of the domain. (Contributed by RP, 13-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹:𝐶⟶𝒫 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵
Theorem	sdomne0 41807	A class that strictly dominates any set is not empty. (Suggested by SN, 14-Jan-2025.) (Contributed by RP, 14-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐵 ≺ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	sdomne0d 41808	A class that strictly dominates any set is not empty. (Contributed by RP, 3-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	safesnsupfiss 41809	If 𝐵 is a finite subset of ordered class 𝐴, we can safely create a small subset with the same largest element and upper bound, if any. (Contributed by RP, 1-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑂 = ∅ ∨ 𝑂 = 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝑂 ≺ 𝐵, {sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)}, 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	safesnsupfiub 41810*	If 𝐵 is a finite subset of ordered class 𝐴, we can safely create a small subset with the same largest element and upper bound, if any. (Contributed by RP, 1-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑂 = ∅ ∨ 𝑂 = 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥𝑅𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ if (𝑂 ≺ 𝐵, {sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)}, 𝐵)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥𝑅𝑦)
Theorem	safesnsupfidom1o 41811	If 𝐵 is a finite subset of ordered class 𝐴, we can safely create a small subset with the same largest element and upper bound, if any. (Contributed by RP, 1-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑂 = ∅ ∨ 𝑂 = 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝑂 ≺ 𝐵, {sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)}, 𝐵) ≼ 1o)
Theorem	safesnsupfilb 41812*	If 𝐵 is a finite subset of ordered class 𝐴, we can safely create a small subset with the same largest element and upper bound, if any. (Contributed by RP, 3-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑂 = ∅ ∨ 𝑂 = 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ if(𝑂 ≺ 𝐵, {sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)}, 𝐵))∀𝑦 ∈ if (𝑂 ≺ 𝐵, {sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)}, 𝐵)𝑥𝑅𝑦)
Theorem	isoeq145d 41813	Equality deduction for isometries. (Contributed by RP, 14-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐶, 𝐷)))
Theorem	resisoeq45d 41814	Equality deduction for equally restricted isometries. (Contributed by RP, 14-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ (𝐹 ↾ 𝐶) Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐶, 𝐷)))
Theorem	negslem1 41815	An equivalence between identically restricted order-reversing self-isometries. (Contributed by RP, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) Isom 𝑅, ◡𝑅(𝐴, 𝐴) ↔ (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) Isom 𝑅, ◡𝑅(𝐵, 𝐵)))
Theorem	nvocnvb 41816*	Equivalence to saying the converse of an involution is the function itself. (Contributed by RP, 13-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ◡𝐹 = 𝐹) ↔ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = 𝑥))
Theorem	rp-brsslt 41817*	Binary relation form of a relation, <, which has been extended from relation 𝑅 to subsets of class 𝑆. Usually, we will assume 𝑅 Or 𝑆. Definition in [Alling], p. 2. Generalization of brsslt 27168. (Originally by Scott Fenton, 8-Dec-2021.) (Contributed by RP, 28-Nov-2023.)
⊢ < = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 𝑥𝑅𝑦)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥𝑅𝑦)))
Theorem	nla0002 41818*	Extending a linear order to subsets, the empty set is less than any subset. Note in [Alling], p. 3. (Contributed by RP, 28-Nov-2023.)
⊢ < = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 𝑥𝑅𝑦)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ < 𝐴)
Theorem	nla0003 41819*	Extending a linear order to subsets, the empty set is greater than any subset. Note in [Alling], p. 3. (Contributed by RP, 28-Nov-2023.)
⊢ < = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 𝑥𝑅𝑦)}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < ∅)
Theorem	nla0001 41820*	Extending a linear order to subsets, the empty set is less than itself. Note in [Alling], p. 3. (Contributed by RP, 28-Nov-2023.)
⊢ < = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑏 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 𝑥𝑅𝑦)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ < ∅)
Theorem	faosnf0.11b 41821*	𝐵 is called a non-limit ordinal if it is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.) Alling, Norman L. "Fundamentals of Analysis Over Surreal Numbers Fields." The Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics 19, no. 3 (1989): 565-73. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44237243.
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)
Theorem	dfno2 41822	A surreal number, in the functional sign expansion representation, is a function which maps from an ordinal into a set of two possible signs. (Contributed by RP, 12-Jan-2025.)
⊢ No = {𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 (On × {1o, 2o}) ∣ (Fun 𝑓 ∧ dom 𝑓 ∈ On)}
Theorem	onnog 41823	Every ordinal maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ {1o, 2o}) → (𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∈ No )
Theorem	onnobdayg 41824	Every ordinal maps to a surreal number of that birthday. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ {1o, 2o}) → ( bday ‘(𝐴 × {𝐵})) = 𝐴)
Theorem	bdaybndex 41825	Bounds formed from the birthday are surreal numbers. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 = ( bday ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ {1o, 2o}) → (𝐵 × {𝐶}) ∈ No )
Theorem	bdaybndbday 41826	Bounds formed from the birthday have the same birthday. (Contributed by RP, 30-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 = ( bday ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ {1o, 2o}) → ( bday ‘(𝐵 × {𝐶})) = ( bday ‘𝐴))
Theorem	onno 41827	Every ordinal maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 × {2o}) ∈ No )
Theorem	onnoi 41828	Every ordinal maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 × {2o}) ∈ No
Theorem	0no 41829	Ordinal zero maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ No
Theorem	1no 41830	Ordinal one maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (1o × {2o}) ∈ No
Theorem	2no 41831	Ordinal two maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (2o × {2o}) ∈ No
Theorem	3no 41832	Ordinal three maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (3o × {2o}) ∈ No
Theorem	4no 41833	Ordinal four maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (4o × {2o}) ∈ No
Theorem	fnimafnex 41834	The functional image of a function value exists. (Contributed by RP, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 Fn 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 “ (𝐺‘𝐴)) ∈ V
21.32.4  Short Studies
Theorem	nlimsuc 41835	A successor is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 13-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ¬ Lim suc 𝐴)
Theorem	nlim1NEW 41836	1 is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 1-Dec-2024.) (Proof shortened by RP, 13-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ¬ Lim 1o
Theorem	nlim2NEW 41837	2 is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 1-Dec-2024.) (Proof shortened by RP, 13-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ¬ Lim 2o
Theorem	nlim3 41838	3 is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 13-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ¬ Lim 3o
Theorem	nlim4 41839	4 is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 13-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ¬ Lim 4o
Theorem	oa1un 41840	Given 𝐴 ∈ On, let 𝐴 +o 1o be defined to be the union of 𝐴 and {𝐴}. Compare with oa1suc 8482. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 +o 1o) = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴}))
Theorem	oa1cl 41841	𝐴 +o 1o is in On. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 +o 1o) ∈ On)
Theorem	0finon 41842	0 is a finite ordinal. See peano1 7830. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	1finon 41843	1 is a finite ordinal. See 1onn 8591. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 1o ∈ (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	2finon 41844	2 is a finite ordinal. See 1onn 8591. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 2o ∈ (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	3finon 41845	3 is a finite ordinal. See 1onn 8591. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 3o ∈ (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	4finon 41846	4 is a finite ordinal. See 1onn 8591. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 4o ∈ (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	finona1cl 41847	The finite ordinals are closed under the add one operation. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (On ∩ Fin) → (𝑁 +o 1o) ∈ (On ∩ Fin))
Theorem	finonex 41848	The finite ordinals are a set. See also onprc 7717 and fiprc 8996 for proof that On and Fin are proper classes. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (On ∩ Fin) ∈ V
Theorem	fzunt 41849	Union of two adjacent finite sets of sequential integers that share a common endpoint. (Suggested by NM, 21-Jul-2005.) (Contributed by RP, 14-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐾 ≤ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁)) → ((𝐾...𝑀) ∪ (𝑀...𝑁)) = (𝐾...𝑁))
Theorem	fzuntd 41850	Union of two adjacent finite sets of sequential integers that share a common endpoint. (Contributed by RP, 14-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≤ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾...𝑀) ∪ (𝑀...𝑁)) = (𝐾...𝑁))
Theorem	fzunt1d 41851	Union of two overlapping finite sets of sequential integers. (Contributed by RP, 14-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≤ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾...𝐿) ∪ (𝑀...𝑁)) = (𝐾...𝑁))
Theorem	fzuntgd 41852	Union of two adjacent or overlapping finite sets of sequential integers. (Contributed by RP, 14-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≤ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ (𝐿 + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾...𝐿) ∪ (𝑀...𝑁)) = (𝐾...𝑁))
21.32.4.1  Additional work on conditional logical operator
Theorem	ifpan123g 41853	Conjunction of conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) ∧ if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜂)) ↔ (((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜏)) ∧ ((¬ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜂))))
Theorem	ifpan23 41854	Conjunction of conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) ∧ if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜏)) ↔ if-(𝜑, (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃), (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpdfor2 41855	Define or in terms of conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜑, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifporcor 41856	Corollary of commutation of or. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜑, 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜓, 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpdfan2 41857	Define and with conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpancor 41858	Corollary of commutation of and. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜑) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜑, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpdfor 41859	Define or in terms of conditional logic operator and true. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, ⊤, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpdfan 41860	Define and with conditional logic operator and false. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ⊥))
Theorem	ifpbi2 41861	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜒, 𝜑, 𝜃) ↔ if-(𝜒, 𝜓, 𝜃)))
Theorem	ifpbi3 41862	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜒, 𝜃, 𝜑) ↔ if-(𝜒, 𝜃, 𝜓)))
Theorem	ifpim1 41863	Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(¬ 𝜑, ⊤, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpnot 41864	Restate negated wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ if-(𝜑, ⊥, ⊤))
Theorem	ifpid2 41865	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ if-(𝜑, ⊤, ⊥))
Theorem	ifpim2 41866	Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, ⊤, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpbi23 41867	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (if-(𝜏, 𝜑, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜏, 𝜓, 𝜃)))
Theorem	ifpbiidcor 41868	Restatement of biid 260. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ if-(𝜑, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	ifpbicor 41869	Corollary of commutation of biconditional. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpxorcor 41870	Corollary of commutation of biconditional. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, ¬ 𝜑, 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpbi1 41871	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃)))
Theorem	ifpnot23 41872	Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpnotnotb 41873	Factor conditional logic operator over negation in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpnorcor 41874	Corollary of commutation of nor. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜑, ¬ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpnancor 41875	Corollary of commutation of and. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑) ↔ if-(𝜓, ¬ 𝜑, ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpnot23b 41876	Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpbiidcor2 41877	Restatement of biid 260. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ¬ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜑, 𝜑)
Theorem	ifpnot23c 41878	Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpnot23d 41879	Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpdfnan 41880	Define nand as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ⊤))
Theorem	ifpdfxor 41881	Define xor as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpbi12 41882	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpbi13 41883	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜏, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜏, 𝜃)))
Theorem	ifpbi123 41884	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜂)))
Theorem	ifpidg 41885	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜃 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜓)) ∧ ((𝜒 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜃)) ∧ (𝜃 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)))))
Theorem	ifpid3g 41886	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜒 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜓)))
Theorem	ifpid2g 41887	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜓 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)) ∧ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))))
Theorem	ifpid1g 41888	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜒 → 𝜑) ∧ (𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	ifpim23g 41889	Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜒, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑)) ↔ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))))
Theorem	ifpim3 41890	Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpnim1 41891	Restate negated implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpim4 41892	Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpnim2 41893	Restate negated implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpim123g 41894	Implication of conditional logical operators. The right hand side is basically conjunctive normal form which is useful in proofs. (Contributed by RP, 16-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) → if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜂)) ↔ ((((𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ∧ ((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜏 → 𝜃))) ∧ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 → 𝜂)) ∧ ((¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜏 → 𝜂)))))
Theorem	ifpim1g 41895	Implication of conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) → if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃)) ↔ (((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜃 → 𝜒)) ∧ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	ifp1bi 41896	Substitute the first element of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃)) ↔ ((((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ∧ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜃 → 𝜒))) ∧ (((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ∧ ((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜃 → 𝜒)))))
Theorem	ifpbi1b 41897	When the first variable is irrelevant, it can be replaced. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpimimb 41898	Factor conditional logic operator over implication in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 → 𝜒), (𝜃 → 𝜏)) ↔ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpororb 41899	Factor conditional logic operator over disjunction in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒), (𝜃 ∨ 𝜏)) ↔ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) ∨ if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpananb 41900	Factor conditional logic operator over conjunction in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒), (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)) ↔ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) ∧ if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))