Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > equsalh | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: An equivalence related to implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2379. See equsalhw 2295 for a version with a disjoint variable condition requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
equsalh.1 | ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) |
equsalh.2 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
equsalh | ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | equsalh.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) | |
2 | 1 | nf5i 2147 | . 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 |
3 | equsalh.2 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
4 | 2, 3 | equsal 2428 | 1 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∀wal 1536 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-10 2142 ax-12 2175 ax-13 2379 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 |
This theorem is referenced by: dvelimf-o 36225 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |