P. 25 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 2401-2500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	dral1v 2401*	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Version of dral1 2471 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2404. Remark: the corresponding versions for dral2 2470 and drex2 2474 are instances of albidv 1950 and exbidv 1951 respectively. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-1994.) (Revised by BJ, 17-Jun-2019.) Base the proof on ax12v 2214. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 30-Mar-2024.) Avoid ax-10 2176. (Revised by GG, 18-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	drex1v 2402*	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Version of drex1 2473 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-2005.) (Revised by BJ, 17-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	drnf1v 2403*	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Version of drnf1 2475 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2404. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.) (Revised by BJ, 17-Jun-2019.) Avoid ax-10 2176. (Revised by GG, 18-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓))
1.5.4  Axiom scheme ax-13 (Quantified Equality)
Axiom	ax-13 2404	Axiom of Quantified Equality. One of the equality and substitution axioms of predicate calculus with equality. An equivalent way to express this axiom that may be easier to understand is (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑧))) (see ax13b 2062). Recall that in the intended interpretation, our variables are metavariables ranging over the variables of predicate calculus (the object language). In order for the first antecedent ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 to hold, 𝑥 and 𝑦 must have different values and thus cannot be the same object-language variable (so they are effectively "distinct variables" even though no $d is present). Similarly, 𝑥 and 𝑧 cannot be the same object-language variable. Therefore, 𝑥 will not occur in the wff 𝑦 = 𝑧 when the first two antecedents hold, so analogous to ax-5 1940, the conclusion (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑧) follows. Note that ax-5 1940 cannot prove this because its distinct variable ($d) requirement is not satisfied directly but only indirectly (outside of Metamath) by the argument above. The original version of this axiom was ax-c9 39642 and was replaced with this shorter ax-13 2404 in December 2015. The old axiom is proved from this one as Theorem axc9 2414. The primary purpose of this axiom is to provide a way to introduce the quantifier ∀𝑥 on 𝑦 = 𝑧 even when 𝑥 and 𝑦 are substituted with the same variable. In this case, the first antecedent becomes ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑥 and the axiom still holds. This axiom is mostly used to eliminate conditions requiring set variables be distinct (cf. ax6ev 1999 and ax6e 2415, for example) in proofs. In practice, theorems beyond elementary set theory do not really benefit from such eliminations, so direct or indirect application of this axiom is discouraged now. You need to explicitly confirm its use in case you see a sensible application in a niche. After some assisting contributions by others over the years, it was in particular the extensive work of Gino Giotto in 2024 that helped reducing dependencies on this axiom on a large scale. Although this version is shorter, the original version axc9 2414 may be more practical to work with because of the "distinctor" form of its antecedents. A typical application of axc9 2414 is in dvelimh 2482 which converts a distinct variable pair to the distinctor antecedent ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦. In particular, it is conjectured that it is not possible to prove ax6 2416 from ax6v 1998 without this axiom. This axiom can be weakened if desired by adding distinct variable restrictions on pairs 𝑥, 𝑧 and 𝑦, 𝑧. To show that, we add these restrictions to Theorem ax13v 2405 and use only ax13v 2405 for further derivations. Thus, ax13v 2405 should be the only theorem referencing this axiom. Other theorems can reference either ax13v 2405 (preferred) or ax13 2407 (if the stronger form is needed). This axiom scheme is logically redundant (see ax13w 2171) but is used as an auxiliary axiom scheme to achieve scheme completeness (i.e. so that all possible cases of bundling can be proved; see text linked at mmtheorems.html#ax6dgen 2171). It is not known whether this axiom can be derived from the others. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))
Theorem	ax13v 2405*	A weaker version of ax-13 2404 with distinct variable restrictions on pairs 𝑥, 𝑧 and 𝑦, 𝑧. In order to show (with ax13 2407) that this weakening is still adequate, this should be the only theorem referencing ax-13 2404 directly. Had we additionally required 𝑥 and 𝑦 be distinct, too, this theorem would have been a direct consequence of ax-5 1940. So essentially this theorem states, that a distinct variable condition can be replaced with an inequality between set variables. Preferably, use the version ax13w 2171 to avoid the propagation of ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))
Theorem	ax13lem1 2406*	A version of ax13v 2405 with one distinct variable restriction dropped. For convenience, 𝑦 is kept on the right side of equations. The proof of ax13 2407 bases on ideas from NM, 24-Dec-2015. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦))
Theorem	ax13 2407	Derive ax-13 2404 from ax13v 2405 and Tarski's FOL. This shows that the weakening in ax13v 2405 is still sufficient for a complete system. Preferably, use the weaker ax13w 2171 to avoid the propagation of ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 31-Jan-2018.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 2-Jun-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))
Theorem	ax13lem2 2408*	Lemma for nfeqf2 2409. This lemma is equivalent to ax13v 2405 with one distinct variable constraint removed. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 18-Oct-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑦))
Theorem	nfeqf2 2409*	An equation between setvar is free of any other setvar. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 9-Jun-2019.) Remove dependency on ax-12 2213. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 16-Dec-2022.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦)
Theorem	dveeq2 2410*	Quantifier introduction when one pair of variables is distinct. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (Revised by NM, 20-Jul-2015.) Remove dependency on ax-11 2192. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦))
Theorem	nfeqf1 2411*	An equation between setvar is free of any other setvar. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 10-Jun-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧)
Theorem	dveeq1 2412*	Quantifier introduction when one pair of variables is distinct. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) Remove dependency on ax-11 2192. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))
Theorem	nfeqf 2413	A variable is effectively not free in an equality if it is not either of the involved variables. Ⅎ version of ax-c9 39642. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) Remove dependency on ax-11 2192. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 6-Sep-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦)
Theorem	axc9 2414	Derive set.mm's original ax-c9 39642 from the shorter ax-13 2404. Usage is discouraged to avoid uninformed ax-13 2404 propagation. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2015.) (Revised by NM, 24-Dec-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Apr-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	ax6e 2415	At least one individual exists. This is not a theorem of free logic, which is sound in empty domains. For such a logic, we would add this theorem as an axiom of set theory (Axiom 0 of [Kunen] p. 10). In the system consisting of ax-4 1839 through ax-9 2153, all axioms other than ax-6 1997 are believed to be theorems of free logic, although the system without ax-6 1997 is not complete in free logic. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. It is preferred to use ax6ev 1999 when it is sufficient. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) Shortened after ax13lem1 2406 became available. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
Theorem	ax6 2416	Theorem showing that ax-6 1997 follows from the weaker version ax6v 1998. (Even though this theorem depends on ax-6 1997, all references of ax-6 1997 are made via ax6v 1998. An earlier version stated ax6v 1998 as a separate axiom, but having two axioms caused some confusion.) This theorem should be referenced in place of ax-6 1997 so that all proofs can be traced back to ax6v 1998. When possible, use the weaker ax6v 1998 rather than ax6 2416 since the ax6v 1998 derivation is much shorter and requires fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2013.) (Revised by NM, 25-Jul-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Feb-2018.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use ax6v 1998 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦
Theorem	axc10 2417	Show that the original axiom ax-c10 39638 can be derived from ax6 2416 and axc7 2350 (on top of propositional calculus, ax-gen 1825, and ax-4 1839). See ax6fromc10 39648 for the rederivation of ax6 2416 from ax-c10 39638. Normally, axc10 2417 should be used rather than ax-c10 39638, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. See bj-axc10v 37406 for a weaker version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → 𝜑)
Theorem	spimt 2418	Closed theorem form of spim 2419. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-Mar-2023.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	spim 2419	Specialization, using implicit substitution. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. The spim 2419 series of theorems requires that only one direction of the substitution hypothesis hold. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. See spimw 2000 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-Feb-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	spimed 2420	Deduction version of spime 2421. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-Feb-2018.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use spimedv 2233 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜒 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	spime 2421	Existential introduction, using implicit substitution. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. See spimew 2001 and spimevw 2015 for weaker versions requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Mar-2018.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use spimefv 2234 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	spimv 2422*	A version of spim 2419 with a distinct variable requirement instead of a bound-variable hypothesis. See spimfv 2275 and spimvw 2016 for versions requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1993.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use spimvw 2016 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	spimvALT 2423*	Alternate proof of spimv 2422. Note that it requires only ax-1 6 through ax-5 1940 together with ax6e 2415. Currently, proofs derive from ax6v 1998, but if ax-6 1997 could be used instead, this proof would reduce axiom usage. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1993.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2176. (Revised by BJ, 29-Nov-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	spimev 2424*	Distinct-variable version of spime 2421. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use spimevw 2015 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	spv 2425*	Specialization, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker spvv 2018 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	spei 2426	Inference from existential specialization, using implicit substitution. Remove a distinct variable constraint. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker speiv 2002 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-May-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜑
Theorem	chvar 2427	Implicit substitution of 𝑦 for 𝑥 into a theorem. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker chvarfv 2276 if possible. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 9-Jul-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	chvarv 2428*	Implicit substitution of 𝑦 for 𝑥 into a theorem. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker chvarvv 2019 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 20-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Apr-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	cbv3 2429	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution, that does not use ax-c9 39642. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker cbv3v 2367 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-May-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbval 2430	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Check out cbvalw 2065, cbvalvw 2066, cbvalv1 2373 for versions requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbvex 2431	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Check out cbvexvw 2067, cbvexv1 2374 for weaker versions requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbvalv 2432*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. See cbvalvw 2066 for a version requiring fewer axioms, to be preferred when sufficient. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2176 and shorten proof. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 11-Sep-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbvexv 2433*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. See cbvexvw 2067 for a version requiring fewer axioms, to be preferred when sufficient. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2176 and shorten proof. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 11-Sep-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbv1 2434	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. See cbv1v 2368 with disjoint variable conditions, not depending on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) Format hypotheses to common style. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 13-May-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbv2 2435	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. See cbv2w 2369 with disjoint variable conditions, not depending on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) Format hypotheses to common style, avoid ax-10 2176. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-Sep-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbv3h 2436	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker cbv3hv 2372 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-May-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbv1h 2437	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 13-May-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑦𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∀𝑥𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbv2h 2438	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑦𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∀𝑥𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbvald 2439*	Deduction used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution, particularly useful in conjunction with dvelim 2483. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. See cbvaldw 2370 for a version with 𝑥, 𝑦 disjoint, not depending on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 13-May-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbvexd 2440*	Deduction used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution, particularly useful in conjunction with dvelim 2483. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker cbvexdw 2371 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbvaldva 2441*	Rule used to change the bound variable in a universal quantifier with implicit substitution. Deduction form. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker cbvaldvaw 2068 if possible. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbvexdva 2442*	Rule used to change the bound variable in an existential quantifier with implicit substitution. Deduction form. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker cbvexdvaw 2069 if possible. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbval2 2443*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker cbval2v 2375 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 22-Dec-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 11-Sep-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑤𝜓)
Theorem	cbvex2 2444*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker cbvex2v 2376 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Jun-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜓)
Theorem	cbval2vv 2445*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker cbval2vw 2070 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2005.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2176. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 18-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑤𝜓)
Theorem	cbvex2vv 2446*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker cbvex2vw 2071 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-1995.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2176. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 18-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜓)
Theorem	cbvex4v 2447*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker cbvex4vw 2072 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑣 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑓 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑔) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓∃𝑔𝜒)
Theorem	equs4 2448	Lemma used in proofs of implicit substitution properties. The converse requires either a disjoint variable condition (sbalex 2278) or a nonfreeness hypothesis (equs45f 2491). Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. See equs4v 2030 for a weaker version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2014.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Feb-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	equsal 2449	An equivalence related to implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. See equsalvw 2034 and equsalv 2303 for versions with disjoint variable conditions proved from fewer axioms. See also the dual form equsex 2450. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Feb-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	equsex 2450	An equivalence related to implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. See equsexvw 2035 and equsexv 2304 for versions with disjoint variable conditions proved from fewer axioms. See also the dual form equsal 2449. See equsexALT 2451 for an alternate proof. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Feb-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	equsexALT 2451	Alternate proof of equsex 2450. This proves the result directly, instead of as a corollary of equsal 2449 via equs4 2448. Note in particular that only existential quantifiers appear in the proof and that the only step requiring ax-13 2404 is ax6e 2415. This proof mimics that of equsal 2449 (in particular, note that pm5.32i 584, exbii 1878, 19.41 2271, mpbiran 721 correspond respectively to pm5.74i 274, albii 1849, 19.23 2247, a1bi 365). (Contributed by BJ, 20-Aug-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	equsalh 2452	An equivalence related to implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. See equsalhw 2326 for a version with a disjoint variable condition requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	equsexh 2453	An equivalence related to implicit substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. See equsexhv 2327 for a version with a disjoint variable condition which does not require ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	axc15 2454	Derivation of set.mm's original ax-c15 39641 from ax-c11n 39640 and the shorter ax-12 2213 that has replaced it. Theorem ax12 2455 shows the reverse derivation of ax-12 2213 from ax-c15 39641. Normally, axc15 2454 should be used rather than ax-c15 39641, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 26-Mar-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))))
Theorem	ax12 2455	Rederivation of Axiom ax-12 2213 from ax12v 2214 (used only via sp 2219), axc11r 2400, and axc15 2454 (on top of Tarski's FOL). Since this version depends on ax-13 2404, usage of the weaker ax12v 2214, ax12w 2168, ax12i 1996 are preferred. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2007.) Proof uses contemporary axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 8-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 4-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	ax12b 2456	A bidirectional version of axc15 2454. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	ax13ALT 2457	Alternate proof of ax13 2407 from FOL, sp 2219, and axc9 2414. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 31-Jan-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))
Theorem	axc11n 2458	Derive set.mm's original ax-c11n 39640 from others. Commutation law for identical variable specifiers. The antecedent and consequent are true when 𝑥 and 𝑦 are substituted with the same variable. Lemma L12 in [Megill] p. 445 (p. 12 of the preprint). If a disjoint variable condition is added on 𝑥 and 𝑦, then this becomes an instance of aevlem 2087. Use aecom 2459 instead when this does not lengthen the proof. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1993.) (Revised by NM, 7-Nov-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Mar-2018.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 30-Nov-2019.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 29-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 2-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)
Theorem	aecom 2459	Commutation law for identical variable specifiers. Both sides of the biconditional are true when 𝑥 and 𝑦 are substituted with the same variable. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1993.) Change to a biconditional. (Revised by BJ, 26-Sep-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)
Theorem	aecoms 2460	A commutation rule for identical variable specifiers. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑)
Theorem	naecoms 2461	A commutation rule for distinct variable specifiers. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑)
Theorem	axc11 2462	Show that ax-c11 39639 can be derived from ax-c11n 39640 in the form of axc11n 2458. Normally, axc11 2462 should be used rather than ax-c11 39639, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker axc11v 2300 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-Apr-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑))
Theorem	hbae 2463	All variables are effectively bound in an identical variable specifier. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker hbaev 2091 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-Apr-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦)
Theorem	hbnae 2464	All variables are effectively bound in a distinct variable specifier. Lemma L19 in [Megill] p. 446 (p. 14 of the preprint). Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker hbnaev 2094 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦)
Theorem	nfae 2465	All variables are effectively bound in an identical variable specifier. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
Theorem	nfnae 2466	All variables are effectively bound in a distinct variable specifier. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker nfnaew 2184 when possible. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
Theorem	hbnaes 2467	Rule that applies hbnae 2464 to antecedent. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)
Theorem	axc16i 2468*	Inference with axc16 2297 as its conclusion. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use axc16 2297 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	axc16nfALT 2469*	Alternate proof of axc16nf 2299, shorter but requiring ax-11 2192 and ax-13 2404. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜑)
Theorem	dral2 2470	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Part of Theorem 9.4 of [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of preprint). Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Usage of albidv 1950 is preferred, which requires fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-2005.) Allow a shortening of dral1 2471. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 4-Mar-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑧𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧𝜓))
Theorem	dral1 2471	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Part of Theorem 9.4 of [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of preprint). Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker dral1v 2401 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-1994.) Remove dependency on ax-11 2192. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 6-Sep-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	dral1ALT 2472	Alternate proof of dral1 2471, shorter but requiring ax-11 2192. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Apr-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	drex1 2473	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Part of Theorem 9.4 of [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of preprint). Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker drex1v 2402 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	drex2 2474	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Part of Theorem 9.4 of [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of preprint). Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Usage of exbidv 1951 is preferred, which requires fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑧𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧𝜓))
Theorem	drnf1 2475	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use drnf1v 2403 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	drnf2 2476	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-May-2018.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use nfbidv 1952 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ↔ Ⅎ𝑧𝜓))
Theorem	nfald2 2477	Variation on nfald 2361 which adds the hypothesis that 𝑥 and 𝑦 are distinct in the inner subproof. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use nfald 2361 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	nfexd2 2478	Variation on nfexd 2362 which adds the hypothesis that 𝑥 and 𝑦 are distinct in the inner subproof. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use nfexd 2362 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	exdistrf 2479	Distribution of existential quantifiers, with a bound-variable hypothesis saying that 𝑦 is not free in 𝜑, but 𝑥 can be free in 𝜑 (and there is no distinct variable condition on 𝑥 and 𝑦). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Mar-2013.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-May-2018.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use exdistr 1984 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	dvelimf 2480	Version of dvelimv 2484 without any variable restrictions. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2002.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 11-May-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	dvelimdf 2481	Deduction form of dvelimf 2480. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 11-May-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑧𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒))
Theorem	dvelimh 2482	Version of dvelim 2483 without any variable restrictions. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Check out dvelimhw 2377 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2002.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 11-May-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑧𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	dvelim 2483*	This theorem can be used to eliminate a distinct variable restriction on 𝑥 and 𝑧 and replace it with the "distinctor" ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 as an antecedent. 𝜑 normally has 𝑧 free and can be read 𝜑(𝑧), and 𝜓 substitutes 𝑦 for 𝑧 and can be read 𝜑(𝑦). We do not require that 𝑥 and 𝑦 be distinct: if they are not, the distinctor will become false (in multiple-element domains of discourse) and "protect" the consequent. To obtain a closed-theorem form of this inference, prefix the hypotheses with ∀𝑥∀𝑧, conjoin them, and apply dvelimdf 2481. Other variants of this theorem are dvelimh 2482 (with no distinct variable restrictions) and dvelimhw 2377 (that avoids ax-13 2404). Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Check out dvelimhw 2377 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	dvelimv 2484*	Similar to dvelim 2483 with first hypothesis replaced by a distinct variable condition. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Check out dvelimhw 2377 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Apr-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	dvelimnf 2485*	Version of dvelim 2483 using "not free" notation. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	dveeq2ALT 2486*	Alternate proof of dveeq2 2410, shorter but requiring ax-11 2192. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (Revised by NM, 20-Jul-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦))
Theorem	equvini 2487	A variable introduction law for equality. Lemma 15 of [Monk2] p. 109, however we do not require 𝑧 to be distinct from 𝑥 and 𝑦. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. See equvinv 2059 for a shorter proof requiring fewer axioms when 𝑧 is required to be distinct from 𝑥 and 𝑦. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Sep-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑧(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑦))
Theorem	equvel 2488	A variable elimination law for equality with no distinct variable requirements. Compare equvini 2487. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use equvelv 2061 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 15-Jun-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 = 𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
Theorem	equs5a 2489	A property related to substitution that unlike equs5 2492 does not require a distinctor antecedent. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. This proof uses ax12 2455, see equs5aALT 2398 for an alternative one using ax-12 2213 but not ax13 2407. Usage of the weaker equs5av 2312 is preferred, which uses ax12v2 2215, but not ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
Theorem	equs5e 2490	A property related to substitution that unlike equs5 2492 does not require a distinctor antecedent. This proof uses ax12 2455, see equs5eALT 2399 for an alternative one using ax-12 2213 but not ax13 2407. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 15-Jan-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑦𝜑))
Theorem	equs45f 2491	Two ways of expressing substitution when 𝑦 is not free in 𝜑. The implication "to the left" is equs4 2448 and does not require the nonfreeness hypothesis. Theorem sbalex 2278 replaces the nonfreeness hypothesis with a disjoint variable condition and equs5 2492 replaces it with a distinctor antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.) Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use sbalex 2278 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
Theorem	equs5 2492	Lemma used in proofs of substitution properties. If there is a disjoint variable condition on 𝑥, 𝑦, then sbalex 2278 can be used instead; if 𝑦 is not free in 𝜑, then equs45f 2491 can be used. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 1-Oct-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	dveel1 2493*	Quantifier introduction when one pair of variables is disjoint. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧))
Theorem	dveel2 2494*	Quantifier introduction when one pair of variables is disjoint. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
Theorem	axc14 2495	Axiom ax-c14 39643 is redundant if we assume ax-5 1940. Remark 9.6 in [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of the preprint), regarding axiom scheme C14'. Note that 𝑤 is a dummy variable introduced in the proof. Its purpose is to satisfy the distinct variable requirements of dveel2 2494 and ax-5 1940. By the end of the proof it has vanished, and the final theorem has no distinct variable requirements. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-1995.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)))
Theorem	sb6x 2496	Equivalence involving substitution for a variable not free. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Usage of sb6 2119 is preferred, which requires fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
Theorem	sbequ5 2497	Substitution does not change an identical variable specifier. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝑤 / 𝑧]∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦)
Theorem	sbequ6 2498	Substitution does not change a distinctor. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝑤 / 𝑧] ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦)
Theorem	sb5rf 2499	Reversed substitution. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 20-Sep-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	sb6rf 2500	Reversed substitution. For a version requiring disjoint variables, but fewer axioms, see sb6rfv 2389. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker sb6rfv 2389 if possible. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-Sep-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))