Theorem equsexALT 2416

Description: Alternate proof of equsex 2415. This proves the result directly, instead of as a corollary of equsal 2414 via equs4 2413. Note in particular that only existential quantifiers appear in the proof and that the only step requiring ax-13 2369 is ax6e 2380. This proof mimics that of equsal 2414 (in particular, note that pm5.32i 573, exbii 1848, 19.41 2226, mpbiran 705 correspond respectively to pm5.74i 270, albii 1819, 19.23 2202, a1bi 361). (Contributed by BJ, 20-Aug-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
equsal.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
equsal.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
equsexALT	⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Proof of Theorem equsexALT

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equsal.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
2	1	pm5.32i 573	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜓))
3	2	exbii 1848	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜓))
4		ax6e 2380	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
5		equsal.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
6	5	19.41 2226	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜓))
7	4, 6	mpbiran 705	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜓)
8	3, 7	bitri 274	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 394  ∃wex 1779  Ⅎwnf 1783

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2009  ax-12 2169  ax-13 2369

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784

This theorem is referenced by: (None)