Theorem wl-dfcleq.basic 37872

Description: This theorem is a conservative extension of ax-ext 2712 to classes, with no hypotheses. It is not complete, since ax-8 2121 can be derived (see in-ax8 36453) via alpha-renaming.

Although unsuitable for general use, it is adequate for the development of theorems unaffected by alpha-renaming, including:

1. Theorems with no bound variables in the hypotheses or conclusion (see eqriv 2737).

2. Theorems using the same bound variable throughout (see abbib 2809).

3. Theorems with distinct bound variables arising only through implicit substitution (see eqabbw 2813).

Remark: the proof uses axextb 2715 to prove the hypothesis of df-cleq 2732 that is a degenerate instance, but it could be proved also from minimal propositional calculus and { ax-gen 1802, equid 2019 }. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 24-Jun-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wl-dfcleq.basic	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Proof of Theorem wl-dfcleq.basic

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 𝑡 𝑢 𝑣 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		axextb 2715	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 ↔ ∀𝑢(𝑢 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑧))
2		axextb 2715	. 2 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑡 ↔ ∀𝑣(𝑣 ∈ 𝑡 ↔ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑡))
3	1, 2	wl-df.cleq 37871	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 207  ∀wal 1545   = wceq 1547   ∈ wcel 2119

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-9 2129  ax-ext 2712

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-ex 1787  df-cleq 2732

This theorem is referenced by:  wl-dfcleq.just  37873  wl-dfcleq  37877