Theorem abbib 2830

Description: Equal class abstractions require equivalent formulas, and conversely. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Remove dependency on ax-8 2147 and df-clel 2836 (by avoiding use of cleqh 2890). (Revised by BJ, 23-Jun-2019.) Definitial form. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 23-Feb-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
abbib	⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Proof of Theorem abbib

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfcleq 2754	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}))
2		nfsab1 2747	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
3		nfsab1 2747	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}
4	2, 3	nfbi 1936	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})
5		nfv 1947	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
6		df-clab 2740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
7		sbequ12r 2288	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
8	6, 7	bitrid 286	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑))
9		df-clab 2740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
10		sbequ12r 2288	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜓))
11	9, 10	bitrid 286	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ 𝜓))
12	8, 11	bibi12d 348	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)))
13	4, 5, 12	cbvalv1 2371	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
14	1, 13	bitri 278	1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570  [wsb 2099   ∈ wcel 2145  {cab 2739

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753

This theorem is used by:  eqabb  2900  nabbib  3061  rabbi  3442  ab0  4329  absn  4604  kardenOLD  9941  abeqabi  44367  elnev  45380  csbingVD  45825  csbsngVD  45834  csbxpgVD  45835  csbrngVD  45837  csbunigVD  45839  csbfv12gALTVD  45840