Theorem abbib 2829

Description: Equal class abstractions require equivalent formulas, and conversely. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Remove dependency on ax-8 2146 and df-clel 2835 (by avoiding use of cleqh 2889). (Revised by BJ, 23-Jun-2019.) Definitial form. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 23-Feb-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
abbib	⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Proof of Theorem abbib

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfcleq 2753	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}))
2		nfsab1 2746	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
3		nfsab1 2746	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}
4	2, 3	nfbi 1935	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})
5		nfv 1946	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
6		df-clab 2739	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
7		sbequ12r 2287	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
8	6, 7	bitrid 286	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑))
9		df-clab 2739	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
10		sbequ12r 2287	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜓))
11	9, 10	bitrid 286	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ 𝜓))
12	8, 11	bibi12d 348	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)))
13	4, 5, 12	cbvalv1 2370	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
14	1, 13	bitri 278	1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209  ∀wal 1567   = wceq 1569  [wsb 2098   ∈ wcel 2144  {cab 2738

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1572  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752

This theorem is used by:  eqabb  2899  nabbib  3060  rabbi  3441  ab0  4328  absn  4600  kardenOLD  9963  abeqabi  44502  elnev  45514  csbingVD  45959  csbsngVD  45968  csbxpgVD  45969  csbrngVD  45971  csbunigVD  45973  csbfv12gALTVD  45974