Theorem wepwso 39663

Description: A well-ordering induces a strict ordering on the power set. EDITORIAL: when well-orderings are set like, this can be strengthened to remove 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
wepwso.t	⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wepwso	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑇(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem wepwso

Dummy variable 𝑎 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2onn 8266	. . . . 5 ⊢ 2o ∈ ω
2		nnord 7588	. . . . 5 ⊢ (2o ∈ ω → Ord 2o)
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ Ord 2o
4		ordwe 6204	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ord 2o → E We 2o)
5		weso 5546	. . . 4 ⊢ ( E We 2o → E Or 2o)
6	3, 4, 5	mp2b 10	. . 3 ⊢ E Or 2o
7		eqid 2821	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}
8	7	wemapso 9015	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ E Or 2o) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2o ↑m 𝐴))
9	6, 8	mp3an3 1446	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2o ↑m 𝐴))
10		elex 3512	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
11		wepwso.t	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))}
12		eqid 2821	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1o})) = (𝑎 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1o}))
13	11, 7, 12	wepwsolem 39662	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (𝑎 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1o})) Isom {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}, 𝑇((2o ↑m 𝐴), 𝒫 𝐴))
14		isoso 7101	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1o})) Isom {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}, 𝑇((2o ↑m 𝐴), 𝒫 𝐴) → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↔ 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴))
15	10, 13, 14	3syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↔ 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴))
16	15	adantr 483	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↔ 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴))
17	9, 16	mpbid 234	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114  ∀wral 3138  ∃wrex 3139  Vcvv 3494  𝒫 cpw 4539  {csn 4567   class class class wbr 5066  {copab 5128   ↦ cmpt 5146   E cep 5464   Or wor 5473   We wwe 5513  ^◡ccnv 5554   “ cima 5558  Ord word 6190  ‘cfv 6355   Isom wiso 6356  (class class class)co 7156  ωcom 7580  1_oc1o 8095  2_oc2o 8096   ↑_m cmap 8406

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2793  ax-rep 5190  ax-sep 5203  ax-nul 5210  ax-pow 5266  ax-pr 5330  ax-un 7461

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3or 1084  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ne 3017  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-reu 3145  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-sbc 3773  df-csb 3884  df-dif 3939  df-un 3941  df-in 3943  df-ss 3952  df-pss 3954  df-nul 4292  df-if 4468  df-pw 4541  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-tp 4572  df-op 4574  df-uni 4839  df-iun 4921  df-br 5067  df-opab 5129  df-mpt 5147  df-tr 5173  df-id 5460  df-eprel 5465  df-po 5474  df-so 5475  df-fr 5514  df-we 5516  df-xp 5561  df-rel 5562  df-cnv 5563  df-co 5564  df-dm 5565  df-rn 5566  df-res 5567  df-ima 5568  df-ord 6194  df-on 6195  df-lim 6196  df-suc 6197  df-iota 6314  df-fun 6357  df-fn 6358  df-f 6359  df-f1 6360  df-fo 6361  df-f1o 6362  df-fv 6363  df-isom 6364  df-ov 7159  df-oprab 7160  df-mpo 7161  df-om 7581  df-1st 7689  df-2nd 7690  df-1o 8102  df-2o 8103  df-map 8408

This theorem is referenced by:  aomclem1  39674