Theorem bdsep2 13084

Description: Version of ax-bdsep 13082 with one disjoint variable condition removed and without initial universal quantifier. Use bdsep1 13083 when sufficient. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bdsep2.1	|- BOUNDED ph

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bdsep2	|- E. b A. x ( x e. b <-> ( x e. a /\ ph ) )

Distinct variable groups:   a, b, x   ph, b

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, a)

Proof of Theorem bdsep2

Dummy variable y is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq2 2203	. . . . . 6 |- ( y = a -> ( x e. y <-> x e. a ) )
2	1	anbi1d 460	. . . . 5 |- ( y = a -> ( ( x e. y /\ ph ) <-> ( x e. a /\ ph ) ) )
3	2	bibi2d 231	. . . 4 |- ( y = a -> ( ( x e. b <-> ( x e. y /\ ph ) ) <-> ( x e. b <-> ( x e. a /\ ph ) ) ) )
4	3	albidv 1796	. . 3 |- ( y = a -> ( A. x ( x e. b <-> ( x e. y /\ ph ) ) <-> A. x ( x e. b <-> ( x e. a /\ ph ) ) ) )
5	4	exbidv 1797	. 2 |- ( y = a -> ( E. b A. x ( x e. b <-> ( x e. y /\ ph ) ) <-> E. b A. x ( x e. b <-> ( x e. a /\ ph ) ) ) )
6		bdsep2.1	. . 3 |- BOUNDED ph
7	6	bdsep1 13083	. 2 |- E. b A. x ( x e. b <-> ( x e. y /\ ph ) )
8	5, 7	chvarv 1909	1 |- E. b A. x ( x e. b <-> ( x e. a /\ ph ) )

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 103   <-> wb 104   A.wal 1329   E.wex 1468  BOUNDED wbd 13010

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-5 1423  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-ext 2121  ax-bdsep 13082

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1437  df-cleq 2132  df-clel 2135

This theorem is referenced by:  bdsepnft  13085  bdsepnfALT  13087