Theorem bdsep2 13768

Description: Version of ax-bdsep 13766 with one disjoint variable condition removed and without initial universal quantifier. Use bdsep1 13767 when sufficient. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bdsep2.1	⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bdsep2	⊢ ∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑎,𝑏,𝑥   𝜑,𝑏

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑎)

Proof of Theorem bdsep2

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq2 2230	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑎 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎))
2	1	anbi1d 461	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑎 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑)))
3	2	bibi2d 231	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑎 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑))))
4	3	albidv 1812	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑎 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑))))
5	4	exbidv 1813	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑎 → (∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑))))
6		bdsep2.1	. . 3 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
7	6	bdsep1 13767	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
8	5, 7	chvarv 1925	1 ⊢ ∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104  ∀wal 1341  ∃wex 1480  BOUNDED wbd 13694

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-5 1435  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-ext 2147  ax-bdsep 13766

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1449  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161

This theorem is referenced by:  bdsepnft  13769  bdsepnfALT  13771