Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > axnul | GIF version |
Description: The Null Set Axiom of ZF
set theory: there exists a set with no
elements. Axiom of Empty Set of [Enderton] p. 18. In some textbooks,
this is presented as a separate axiom; here we show it can be derived
from Separation ax-sep 4105. This version of the Null Set Axiom tells us
that at least one empty set exists, but does not tell us that it is
unique - we need the Axiom of Extensionality to do that (see
zfnuleu 4111).
This theorem should not be referenced by any proof. Instead, use ax-nul 4113 below so that the uses of the Null Set Axiom can be more easily identified. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 3-Feb-2008.) (Revised by NM, 4-Feb-2008.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
axnul | ⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ax-sep 4105 | . 2 ⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦))) | |
2 | pm3.24 688 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ¬ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦) | |
3 | 2 | intnan 924 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ¬ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦)) |
4 | id 19 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦))) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦)))) | |
5 | 3, 4 | mtbiri 670 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦))) → ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) |
6 | 5 | alimi 1448 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦))) → ∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) |
7 | 6 | eximi 1593 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦))) → ∃𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) |
8 | 1, 7 | ax-mp 5 | 1 ⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 ∧ wa 103 ↔ wb 104 ∀wal 1346 ∃wex 1485 ∈ wcel 2141 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-in1 609 ax-in2 610 ax-5 1440 ax-gen 1442 ax-ie1 1486 ax-ie2 1487 ax-4 1503 ax-ial 1527 ax-sep 4105 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |