Definition df-wetr 4460

Description: Define the well-ordering predicate. It is unusual to define "well-ordering" in the absence of excluded middle, but we mean an ordering which is like the ordering which we have for ordinals (for example, it does not entail trichotomy because ordinals do not have that as seen at ordtriexmid 4648). Given excluded middle, well-ordering is usually defined to require trichotomy (and the definition of Fr is typically also different). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 23-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
df-wetr	⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧

Detailed syntax breakdown of Definition df-wetr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cA	. . 3 class 𝐴
2		cR	. . 3 class 𝑅
3	1, 2	wwe 4456	. 2 wff 𝑅 We 𝐴
4	1, 2	wfr 4454	. . 3 wff 𝑅 Fr 𝐴
5		vx	. . . . . . . . . 10 setvar 𝑥
6	5	cv 1397	. . . . . . . . 9 class 𝑥
7		vy	. . . . . . . . . 10 setvar 𝑦
8	7	cv 1397	. . . . . . . . 9 class 𝑦
9	6, 8, 2	wbr 4114	. . . . . . . 8 wff 𝑥𝑅𝑦
10		vz	. . . . . . . . . 10 setvar 𝑧
11	10	cv 1397	. . . . . . . . 9 class 𝑧
12	8, 11, 2	wbr 4114	. . . . . . . 8 wff 𝑦𝑅𝑧
13	9, 12	wa 104	. . . . . . 7 wff (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)
14	6, 11, 2	wbr 4114	. . . . . . 7 wff 𝑥𝑅𝑧
15	13, 14	wi 4	. . . . . 6 wff ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)
16	15, 10, 1	wral 2522	. . . . 5 wff ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)
17	16, 7, 1	wral 2522	. . . 4 wff ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)
18	17, 5, 1	wral 2522	. . 3 wff ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)
19	4, 18	wa 104	. 2 wff (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧))
20	3, 19	wb 105	1 wff (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)))

This definition is referenced by:  nfwe  4481  weeq1  4482  weeq2  4483  wefr  4484  wepo  4485  wetrep  4486  we0  4487  ordwe  4703  wessep  4705  reg3exmidlemwe  4706