Definition df-wetr 4431

Description: Define the well-ordering predicate. It is unusual to define "well-ordering" in the absence of excluded middle, but we mean an ordering which is like the ordering which we have for ordinals (for example, it does not entail trichotomy because ordinals do not have that as seen at ordtriexmid 4619). Given excluded middle, well-ordering is usually defined to require trichotomy (and the definition of Fr is typically also different). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 23-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
df-wetr	⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧

Detailed syntax breakdown of Definition df-wetr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cA	. . 3 class 𝐴
2		cR	. . 3 class 𝑅
3	1, 2	wwe 4427	. 2 wff 𝑅 We 𝐴
4	1, 2	wfr 4425	. . 3 wff 𝑅 Fr 𝐴
5		vx	. . . . . . . . . 10 setvar 𝑥
6	5	cv 1396	. . . . . . . . 9 class 𝑥
7		vy	. . . . . . . . . 10 setvar 𝑦
8	7	cv 1396	. . . . . . . . 9 class 𝑦
9	6, 8, 2	wbr 4088	. . . . . . . 8 wff 𝑥𝑅𝑦
10		vz	. . . . . . . . . 10 setvar 𝑧
11	10	cv 1396	. . . . . . . . 9 class 𝑧
12	8, 11, 2	wbr 4088	. . . . . . . 8 wff 𝑦𝑅𝑧
13	9, 12	wa 104	. . . . . . 7 wff (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)
14	6, 11, 2	wbr 4088	. . . . . . 7 wff 𝑥𝑅𝑧
15	13, 14	wi 4	. . . . . 6 wff ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)
16	15, 10, 1	wral 2510	. . . . 5 wff ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)
17	16, 7, 1	wral 2510	. . . 4 wff ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)
18	17, 5, 1	wral 2510	. . 3 wff ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)
19	4, 18	wa 104	. 2 wff (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧))
20	3, 19	wb 105	1 wff (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)))

This definition is referenced by:  nfwe  4452  weeq1  4453  weeq2  4454  wefr  4455  wepo  4456  wetrep  4457  we0  4458  ordwe  4674  wessep  4676  reg3exmidlemwe  4677